The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 28 Feb 2017, 05:47

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Posts: 38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 29

The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2012, 23:06
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (02:40) correct 41% (02:28) wrong based on 162 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

----------------------
The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple psychological truth, that fear of retaliation makes a would-be aggressor nation hesitate before attacking and is often sufficient to deter it altogether from attacking. Clearly, then to maintain military deterrence, a nation would have to believed to have retaliatory power so great that a potential aggressor nation would have reason to think that it could not defend itself against such retaliation.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following can be properly inferred?

(A) A would-be aggressor nation can be deterred from attacking only if it has certain knowledge that it would be destroyed in retaliation by the country it attacks.

(B) A nation will not attack another nation if it believes that its own retaliatory power surpasses that of the other nation.

(C) One nation’s failing to attack another establishes that the nation that fails to attack believes that it could not withstand a retaliatory attack from the other nation.

(D) It is in the interests of a nation that seeks deterrence and has unsurpassed military power to let potential aggressors against it become aware of its power of retaliatory attack.

(E) Maintaining maximum deterrence from aggression by other nations requires that a nation maintain a retaliatory force greater than that of any other nation.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Moderator
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1231
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 119

Kudos [?]: 1424 [2] , given: 116

Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2012, 23:44
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Going through the answer choices, we can see that only option D is a mild statement. All other statements are quite aggressive stating that for somethging to happen somethin MUST be done. So, our first step would be to take up D and check whether it logically follows the argument. The argument says "to maintain military deterrence, a nation would have to believed to have retaliatory power so great that a potential aggressor nation would have reason to think that it could not defend itself against such retaliation.". Option D clearly follows on from this statement.

Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10640
Followers: 943

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2014, 22:03
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 204
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 49

Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2015, 06:31
MacFauz wrote:
Going through the answer choices, we can see that only option D is a mild statement. All other statements are quite aggressive stating that for somethging to happen somethin MUST be done. So, our first step would be to take up D and check whether it logically follows the argument. The argument says "to maintain military deterrence, a nation would have to believed to have retaliatory power so great that a potential aggressor nation would have reason to think that it could not defend itself against such retaliation.". Option D clearly follows on from this statement.

Kudos Please... If my post helped.

Can anyone explain why not C?
Moreover,I could not get the explanation for "mild statements"
MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 3591
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 1566

Kudos [?]: 12339 [0], given: 1872

Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2015, 17:23
This is NOT a GMAT Pill question, but a real LSAT question (However it appears in GMAT Pill )

1) that fear of retaliation is often sufficient to deter would be aggressors.
2) that in order to maintain military deterrence, a nation would have to be believed to have retaliatory power greater than a potential aggressor could defend.

(A) implies that fear of retaliation is required when it uses the words "only if." But the first statement in the stimulus implies that it's "often sufficient."
(B) has the relationship in the second statement backwards. If a nation believes that it's military power surpasses that of others, then it will not be prevented from retaliating - but it may still attack in the first place.
(C) isn't true either. One nation's not attacking doesn't establish that they feared retaliation. Maybe they just got along with the other nation. The stimulus discusses one thing that would prevent a nation from attacking another nation. The stimulus does not discuss the only thing that would prevent one nation from attacking another nation.
(D) must be true. If one nation has a stronger military than any other nation, and military deterrence is achieved by other nations perceiving themselves to be weaker, then the strongest nation should let every other nation know it's strength, so that those other nations will be deterred from attacking.
(E) is not necessarily true. A weaker nation could trick others into thinking that it was stronger and thereby achieve deterrence.
_________________
Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple   [#permalink] 03 May 2015, 17:23
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 The theory of military deterrence 1 21 Jan 2017, 21:50
A mutually exclusive theory is either true or false based on 0 08 Aug 2013, 09:18
20 The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple 12 03 Dec 2012, 07:20
2 The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple 8 01 Jul 2009, 00:41
The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple 5 07 Sep 2007, 23:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by