GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 20 Oct 2019, 22:24

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 04 Sep 2010
Posts: 31
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2010, 22:10
it is D..
as some non local who is not among top 10 might have more than top 10 local...and vice versa
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 375
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2011, 03:31
'mathematical modeling always helps.Revert in case of doubt'.

that technique helps in understanding the constraints of the problem , otherwise the inference remains vague.
Director
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 854
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2011, 09:21
Close call B and D.

D states that people might get into w/o having great evaluation.
Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 149
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2012, 09:19
Before going through the answer choices, I was able to "guess" the reason why it fails, but failed to map "my reasoning" to the choice D
_________________
-------------------------
-Aravind Chembeti
Intern
Joined: 25 Mar 2011
Posts: 26
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2012, 10:44
2
nverma wrote:
vaivish1723 wrote:
22. The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have decided to offer scholarships to the top 10 percent of local applicants and the top 10 percent of nonlocal applicants as judged on the basis of a qualifying audition. They are doing this to ensure that only the applicants with the most highly evaluated auditions are offered scholarships to the program.
Which one of the following points out why the trustees’ plan might not be effective in achieving its goal?
(A) The best actors can also apply for admission to another program and then not enroll in the Avonbridge program.
(B) Audition materials that produce good results for one actor may disadvantage another, resulting in inaccurate assessment.
(C) The top 10 percent of local and nonlocal applicants might not need scholarships to the Avonbridge program.
(D) Some of the applicants who are offered scholarships could have less highly evaluated auditions than some of the applicants who are not offered scholarships.
(E) Dividing applicants into local and nonlocal groups is unfair because it favors nonlocal applicants.

OA is

Liked this question...!!
Its D.

let say u have 100 local and 100 non-local actors.
and each of these 200 guys have been evaluated and been given some marks out of 500 on the basis of evaluation.

Then we can have the following scenario when first 10 students (10%) of local group are scoring 499,498,497......490.
and first 10 students (10%) of local group are scoring 200,199,198.....190.

It means there can be some actors beyond 10% in local group who have scored more than 200(topper of non local group) and less than 490 (scored by 10th guy) in local group.

And these actors will not be awarded scholarships even though they have higher scores than those of first 10% guys in non-local.

I know the explanation is long, but mathematical modeling always helps.Revert in case of doubt.

Fun question! Nverma does a nice job attacking the stimulus and directing your brain to the right answer. I'll just have fun explaining why each wrong answer is wrong.

A. The conclusion of the stimulus deals with offering those with the most highly evaluated auditions, scholarships. What the applicants do after the committee's offer is beyond the scope. Remember, this is a weaken question. This does not attack the conclusion - that the method the committee is employing will ensure the top 10% of each group will receive scholarship offers. What if the committee DID make offers to the top 10% of each? This seems to fail at weakening the argument.

B. The method of assessment is outside the scope of the argument. But let's run with this idea. So, person A comes in. Person A brought with them a lion from the Savannah. The lion fakes eating person A, the whole act blows the judges away, person A exits the stage and is lauded by the judges. Then person B comes up to be evaluated. Person B has a pet mouse. Person B finds it brilliant to use the mouse in his/her routine. The judges aren't thrilled. They went from a lion almost eating someone, to a mouse doing next to nothing. BUT WHO CARES? The conclusion states that the top 10% of each group are OFFERED scholarships. Person B jaded in comparison to Person A. You could probably make the argument that the magnificence of A negatively affected B. But again, who cares? B could have sucked regardless of A - so B shouldn't be offered a scholarship anyway. This is perfectly plausible with the conclusion. Hence, it does NOT weaken.

C. The need of the scholarships is outside of the scope. Curse the LSAT gods for wasting seconds of your life, then move on.

D. nverma explains why this is true. think about relativity. 500 in group a. 100 in group b.
10% of 500 = 50
10% of 100 = 10

However, applications in group A from 400-449 scored 97% on their applications.
In group B - the 10/100 applications scored -- 3, 99%s ; 4 98%s ; but 3, 92%s

Seems to me that those in group a from 400-449 got SCREWED!

E. This is tricky, however outside of the scope. Even though the non locals may be favored, this doesn't necessarily preclude the offering of scholarships to the most highly evaluated candidates.
Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 190
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2013, 23:47
One thing I don't understand how can someone who is less highly evaluated be above someone who is more highly evaluated. There certainly seems to be a discrepancy.
Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2013
Posts: 65
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2013, 02:55
vudsri000 wrote:
nikhilkatira wrote:
whats wrong with Option B ?

I went with D ........

B.......may be independently correct but does it correct merit levels and scholarships given.....

i went with D too, but was stuck between and B and D for a while.

if we analyse B, if inaccurate assessment causes disparity, obviously it means that the scholarships would not be given to the right people. In that case, the meaning stands the same as option D because as per option D "Some of the applicants who are offered scholarships could have less highly evaluated auditions than some of the applicants who are not offered scholarships". I may be wrong, still would go with D, sounds kind of more convincing to the ears.
Intern
Joined: 19 Jul 2013
Posts: 21
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 340 Q27 V12
GPA: 3.33
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2014, 11:49
harshi wrote:
22. The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have decided to offer scholarships to the top 10 percent of local applicants and the top 10 percent of nonlocal applicants as judged on the basis of a qualifying audition. They are doing this to ensure that only the applicants with the most highly evaluated auditions are offered scholarships to the program.

Which one of the following points out why the trustees' plan might not be effective in achieving its goal?
(A) The best actors can also apply for admission to another program and then not enroll in the Avonbridge program
(B) Audition materials that produce good results for one actor may disadvantage another, resulting in inaccurate assessment
(C) The top 10 percent of local and nonlocal applicants might not need scholarships to the Avonbridge program
(D) Some of the applicants who are offered scholarships could have less highly evaluated auditions than some of the applicants who are not offered scholarships
(E) Dividing applicants into local and nonlocal groups is unfair because it favors nonlocal applicants

Whats the right answer to this question???
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 268
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2014, 05:21
2
WE ARE SELECTING 10% BEST APPLICANTS FROM DIFFERENT GROUPS AND THEN ASSUMING WE HAVE SELECTED THE BEST OUT OF THE AMALGAMATED JOINT GROUP.....WHICH IS WRONG....POINTS TO FLAW........

THE 10% IN EACH GROUP MAY BE THE BEST IN THEIR RESPECTIVE GROUPS BUT SOME MAY NOT BE THE BEST AMONGST THE WHOLE LOT...
ASSUME ONE GROUP WITH ALL TALENT AND ANOTHER WITH ALL DUDS..........EVEN THE BEST OF THE DUD LOT CANNOT BEAT THE 11TH OF THE OTHER LOT.......HENCE "D" WHICH SAYS----- Some of the applicants who are offered scholarships could have less highly evaluated auditions than some of the applicants who are not offered scholarships .....BRINGS OUT THE FLAW.....
Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Posts: 8
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V38
GPA: 3
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2014, 03:38
The point it scholarship and not accurate or inaccurate assessment.

So, B is out. D it is!!!
Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2014
Posts: 61
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2014, 04:43
Initially I selected B, but now i am convinced with the explanation. Looks like i need to focus more on conclusion when answering weaken questions.
_________________
Press KUDOs if you find my explanation helpful
Manager
Joined: 14 Sep 2014
Posts: 86
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2015, 00:03
Which one of the following points out why the trustees' plan might not be effective in achieving its goal

What is goal : Give scholarships to highly evaluated applicants (If they don't want to take it, it will be their problem not trustee's)

Option D correctly states that, because of local and non-local grouping there might be a chance that some of the scholarship baggers will be less evaluated.

Let's see an Example :
Local Got : (100,90,80,70,60,50..,10) Points
Non Local got : (10,9,8,7,6,5..,1) Points
In this case it will be unfair for 90% local as None of non local is highly evaluated than local.

IMO 'D' is correct.
Intern
Joined: 12 Oct 2014
Posts: 45
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 550 Q44 V21
WE: Analyst (Investment Banking)
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2015, 22:28
I will go with D as this clearly points out the fact that what if the count of deserving candidates goes above or below than 10 ?
Intern
Joined: 31 Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 May 2016, 08:59
why option e is not correct ? please explain
_________________
never give up ...Please give Kudos if you like the post ......
Intern
Joined: 08 Nov 2015
Posts: 31
Schools: Pepperdine '19
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2016, 08:54
D

This is an LSAT question, and in no way is this question even close to a sub 600 level one. This is clearly a 700 level question.
Intern
Joined: 27 May 2015
Posts: 41
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2019, 07:21
The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have decided to offer scholarships to the top 10 percent of local applicants and the top 10 percent of nonlocal applicants as judged on the basis of a qualifying audition. They are doing this to ensure that only the applicants with the most highly evaluated auditions are offered scholarships to the program.

Which one of the following points out why the trustees' plan might not be effective in achieving its goal?

(A) The best actors can also apply for admission to another program and then not enroll in the Avonbridge program
(B) Audition materials that produce good results for one actor may disadvantage another, resulting in inaccurate assessment
(C) The top 10 percent of local and nonlocal applicants might not need scholarships to the Avonbridge program
(D) Some of the applicants who are offered scholarships could have less highly evaluated auditions than some of the applicants who are not offered scholarships

Why D - It is direct against the premise which we have to consider as true
"They are doing this to ensure that only the applicants with the most highly evaluated auditions are offered scholarships to the program."

(E) Dividing applicants into local and nonlocal groups is unfair because it favors nonlocal applicants[/quote]
Manager
Joined: 09 May 2018
Posts: 78
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2019, 09:50
The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have decided to offer scholarships to the top 10 percent of local applicants and the top 10 percent of nonlocal applicants as judged on the basis of a qualifying audition. They are doing this to ensure that only the applicants with the most highly evaluated auditions are offered scholarships to the program.

They want to give scholarship to both Local and Non-Local applicants. They want to give scholarships to the most highly evaluated auditions.

Which one of the following points out why the trustees' plan might not be effective in achieving its goal?

(A) The best actors can also apply for admission to another program and then not enroll in the Avonbridge program - Thats okay but their plan of giving to only highly evaluated auditions are still maintained.
(B) Audition materials that produce good results for one actor may disadvantage another, resulting in inaccurate assessment -If that is the case, then actor would not be highly evaluated who performed bad.
(C) The top 10 percent of local and nonlocal applicants might not need scholarships to the Avonbridge program - Thats okay but we are still offering to highly evaluated people.
(D) Some of the applicants who are offered scholarships could have less highly evaluated auditions than some of the applicants who are not offered scholarships - This could be true in the case if we have two different groups of talent pool we want to judge on. Then, we would not offer based on high evaluation criteria.
(E) Dividing applicants into local and nonlocal groups is unfair because it favors nonlocal applicants - But still we cant say that it is affecting the plan trustees have in mind.

Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have   [#permalink] 22 Sep 2019, 09:50

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 37 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by