Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 May 2017, 14:06

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 25 Mar 2011
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2012, 10:44
nverma wrote:
vaivish1723 wrote:
22. The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have decided to offer scholarships to the top 10 percent of local applicants and the top 10 percent of nonlocal applicants as judged on the basis of a qualifying audition. They are doing this to ensure that only the applicants with the most highly evaluated auditions are offered scholarships to the program.
Which one of the following points out why the trustees’ plan might not be effective in achieving its goal?
(A) The best actors can also apply for admission to another program and then not enroll in the Avonbridge program.
(B) Audition materials that produce good results for one actor may disadvantage another, resulting in inaccurate assessment.
(C) The top 10 percent of local and nonlocal applicants might not need scholarships to the Avonbridge program.
(D) Some of the applicants who are offered scholarships could have less highly evaluated auditions than some of the applicants who are not offered scholarships.
(E) Dividing applicants into local and nonlocal groups is unfair because it favors nonlocal applicants.

OA is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
d

Liked this question...!!
Its D.

let say u have 100 local and 100 non-local actors.
and each of these 200 guys have been evaluated and been given some marks out of 500 on the basis of evaluation.

Then we can have the following scenario when first 10 students (10%) of local group are scoring 499,498,497......490.
and first 10 students (10%) of local group are scoring 200,199,198.....190.

It means there can be some actors beyond 10% in local group who have scored more than 200(topper of non local group) and less than 490 (scored by 10th guy) in local group.

And these actors will not be awarded scholarships even though they have higher scores than those of first 10% guys in non-local.

I know the explanation is long, but mathematical modeling always helps.Revert in case of doubt.

Fun question! Nverma does a nice job attacking the stimulus and directing your brain to the right answer. I'll just have fun explaining why each wrong answer is wrong.

A. The conclusion of the stimulus deals with offering those with the most highly evaluated auditions, scholarships. What the applicants do after the committee's offer is beyond the scope. Remember, this is a weaken question. This does not attack the conclusion - that the method the committee is employing will ensure the top 10% of each group will receive scholarship offers. What if the committee DID make offers to the top 10% of each? This seems to fail at weakening the argument.

B. The method of assessment is outside the scope of the argument. But let's run with this idea. So, person A comes in. Person A brought with them a lion from the Savannah. The lion fakes eating person A, the whole act blows the judges away, person A exits the stage and is lauded by the judges. Then person B comes up to be evaluated. Person B has a pet mouse. Person B finds it brilliant to use the mouse in his/her routine. The judges aren't thrilled. They went from a lion almost eating someone, to a mouse doing next to nothing. BUT WHO CARES? The conclusion states that the top 10% of each group are OFFERED scholarships. Person B jaded in comparison to Person A. You could probably make the argument that the magnificence of A negatively affected B. But again, who cares? B could have sucked regardless of A - so B shouldn't be offered a scholarship anyway. This is perfectly plausible with the conclusion. Hence, it does NOT weaken.

C. The need of the scholarships is outside of the scope. Curse the LSAT gods for wasting seconds of your life, then move on.

D. nverma explains why this is true. think about relativity. 500 in group a. 100 in group b.
10% of 500 = 50
10% of 100 = 10

However, applications in group A from 400-449 scored 97% on their applications.
In group B - the 10/100 applications scored -- 3, 99%s ; 4 98%s ; but 3, 92%s

Seems to me that those in group a from 400-449 got SCREWED!

E. This is tricky, however outside of the scope. Even though the non locals may be favored, this doesn't necessarily preclude the offering of scholarships to the most highly evaluated candidates.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10370
Followers: 996

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2013, 21:46
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2013
Posts: 92
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 17

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2013, 02:55
vudsri000 wrote:
nikhilkatira wrote:
whats wrong with Option B ?

I went with D ........

B.......may be independently correct but does it correct merit levels and scholarships given.....

i went with D too, but was stuck between and B and D for a while.

if we analyse B, if inaccurate assessment causes disparity, obviously it means that the scholarships would not be given to the right people. In that case, the meaning stands the same as option D because as per option D "Some of the applicants who are offered scholarships could have less highly evaluated auditions than some of the applicants who are not offered scholarships". I may be wrong, still would go with D, sounds kind of more convincing to the ears.
Intern
Joined: 31 Aug 2014
Posts: 17
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 42

Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 May 2016, 08:59
why option e is not correct ? please explain
_________________

never give up ...Please give Kudos if you like the post ......

Intern
Joined: 08 Nov 2015
Posts: 38
Schools: Pepperdine '19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 24

Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2016, 08:54
D

This is an LSAT question, and in no way is this question even close to a sub 600 level one. This is clearly a 700 level question.
Re: The trustees of the Avonbridge summer drama workshop have   [#permalink] 17 Jul 2016, 08:54

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 25 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 The Board of Trustees of the Federici Art Museum has decided 9 15 Nov 2016, 13:18
5 Excavations in the summer of 2008 at the sites of Hohle Fels 4 04 Apr 2016, 16:25
2 Industry Analyst: This summer is expected to be particularly 10 02 Dec 2016, 03:51
In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 10 06 Aug 2015, 19:34
4 Every book written by June Summers, winner of the Booker 19 18 Jul 2014, 02:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by