It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 16:50

# Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The U.S. census is not perfect: thousands of Ame -Old Thread

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 19 Jun 2004
Posts: 79

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

The U.S. census is not perfect: thousands of Ame -Old Thread [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2004, 12:24
The U.S. census is not perfect: thousands of Americans probably go uncounted. However, the basic statistical portrait of the nation painted by the census is accurate. Certainly some of the poor go uncounted, particularly the homeless; but some of the rich go uncounted as well, because they are often abroad or traveling between one residence and another.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

(A) Both the rich and the poor have personal and economic reasons to avoid being counted by the census.
(B) All Americans may reasonably be classified as either poor or rich.
(C) The percentage of poor Americans uncounted by the census is close to the percentage of rich Americans uncounted.
(D) The number of homeless Americans is approximately equal to the number of rich Americans.
(E) The primary purpose of the census is to analyze the economic status of the American population.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2227

Kudos [?]: 391 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Oct 2005, 15:32
Fact: US census doesn't count thousands of Americans.
Conclusion: Basic stat portrait of the nation painted by census is accurate.
Premise: Some poor are not counted, and some rich are not counted.

What's the assumption that connects the premise to the conclusion?

(A) Both the rich and the poor have personal and economic reasons to avoid being counted by the census.
Irrelevant

(B) All Americans may reasonably be classified as either poor or rich.
Plausible. Because if all middle class are counted, with non counted rich and poor then could census portrait be accurate?

(C) The percentage of poor Americans uncounted by the census is close to the percentage of rich Americans uncounted.
Also plausible. If the percentage is not the same then the portrait may not be accurate.

(D) The number of homeless Americans is approximately equal to the number of rich Americans.
It doesn't have to be. We are not concerned with absolute numbers here.

(E) The primary purpose of the census is to analyze the economic status of the American population.
Again plausible. If it is not to analyze the economic status then why does it matter if the unaccounted are rich or poor?

E is incorrect because even if cencus was to analyze other factors, say age, as long as C is true we could still argue that the census is accurate.
I am not very sure why C is better than B, though.
_________________

Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.

Kudos [?]: 391 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1681

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Oct 2005, 20:25
Well, it's 'C' & not 'B' because the conclusion,

" Basic stat portrait of the nation painted by census is accurate",

is correct only if,

The percentage of uncounted poor Americans is close to the percentage of uncounted rich Americans (this is 'C')

This is the only assumption that will balance the count, to keep the census accurate.

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 793

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2005, 03:47
vivek123 wrote:
Well, it's 'C' & not 'B' because the conclusion,

" Basic stat portrait of the nation painted by census is accurate",

is correct only if,

The percentage of uncounted poor Americans is close to the percentage of uncounted rich Americans (this is 'C')

This is the only assumption that will balance the count, to keep the census accurate.

But again that argument holds if we assume that rich and poor are the two categories being counted! no??
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2227

Kudos [?]: 391 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2005, 09:23
I think we need both assumptions. Either one of them by itself will not be sufficient. I mean yes rich and poor may balance out but if they don't balance out with the middle part I wouldn't say it is accurate.

Then again if you get rid of the middle part and if you don't assume rich and poor balance out the census still can't be accurate.

I suppose you just pick the less of the devil for this question, which is C.
_________________

Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.

Kudos [?]: 391 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 278

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 0

Location: CA, USA
The U.S. census is not perfect: thousands of Americans [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2005, 08:10
The U.S. census is not perfect: thousands of Americans probably go uncounted. However, the basic statistical portrait of the nation painted by the census is accurate. Certainly some of the poor go uncounted, particularly the homeless; but some of the rich go uncounted as well, because they are often abroad or traveling between one residence and another.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(A) Both the rich and the poor have personal and economic reasons to avoid being counted by the census.
(B) All Americans may reasonably be classified as either poor or rich.
(C) The percentage of poor Americans uncounted by the census is close to the percentage of rich Americans uncounted.
(D) The number of homeless Americans is approximately equal to the number of rich Americans.
(E) The primary purpose of the census is to analyze the economic status of the American population.

source: gmat-lsat-189

BTW: I was not able to do search of old postings. I always got 0 record back whatever I typed to search. Anyone else had this problem ?

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1480

Kudos [?]: 433 [0], given: 0

Location: Germany

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2005, 08:50
C)...
_________________

If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.

Kudos [?]: 433 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 453

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2005, 09:08
Yup another C.

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 494 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2005, 16:47
it is C.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 494 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 278

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 0

Location: CA, USA

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2005, 09:06
OA is C

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 35

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

The U.S. census is not perfect: thousands of Americans [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2005, 01:57
The U.S. census is not perfect: thousands of Americans probably go uncounted. However, the basic statistical portrait of the nation painted by the census is accurate. Certainly some of the poor go uncounted, particularly the homeless; but some of the rich go uncounted as well, because they are often abroad or traveling between one residence and another.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

(A) Both the rich and the poor have personal and economic reasons to avoid being counted by the census.

(B) All Americans may reasonably be classified as either poor or rich.

(C) The percentage of poor Americans uncounted by the census is close to the percentage of rich Americans uncounted.

(D) The number of homeless Americans is approximately equal to the number of rich Americans.

(E) The primary purpose of the census is to analyze the economic status of the American population.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 494 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2005, 02:10
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 494 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1681

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2005, 03:11
yes 'C' it is

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1681

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2005, 03:43
yes 'C' it is

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 572

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Location: NYC

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2005, 10:53
I wonder why is it not B??
_________________

Success is my only option, failure is not -- Eminem

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 223

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Location: Germany

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2005, 02:00
bewakoof wrote:
I wonder why is it not B??

Because by reading the passage the key words are counted and uncounted. We must form an assumption here based on these keywords.

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 73

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

The U.S. census is not perfect: thousands of Americans [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2006, 16:30
The U.S. census is not perfect: thousands of Americans probably go uncounted. However, the basic statistical portrait of the nation painted by the census is accurate. Certainly some of the poor go uncounted, particularly the homeless; but some of the rich go uncounted as well, because they are often abroad or traveling between one residence and another.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(A) Both the rich and the poor have personal and economic reasons to avoid being counted by the census.
(B) All Americans may reasonably be classified as either poor or rich.
(C) The percentage of poor Americans uncounted by the census is close to the percentage of rich Americans uncounted.
(D) The number of homeless Americans is approximately equal to the number of rich Americans.
(E) The primary purpose of the census is to analyze the economic status of the American population.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Posts: 89

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: Minneapolis

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2006, 16:43
B
If you negate this assumption then the argument will not stand.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1050

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 0

Location: CA

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2006, 21:12
Agree with B
_________________

Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 1

Location: India

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2006, 21:59
Go B go.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Mar 2006, 08:24
E sounds more like it to me.

"However, the basic statistical portrait of the nation painted by the census is accurate."

This followed by references only to rich and poor, suggests E.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

03 Mar 2006, 08:24

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6    Next  [ 115 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The U.S. census is not perfect: thousands of Ame -Old Thread

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.