VeritasPrepKarishmaHi Karishma and the gmatclub forum,
I have a couple doubts with this problem and would be great if somebody could resolve them. I agree why D could be the best possible answer. I actually got this one right but it took me quite a while to zero in on D. As I knew all the other answers were wrong, but there were a few sincere problems I had with D.
1) This doubt is extremely relevant to selecting the right option. Now as mentioned in the passage, "the correlation is strong", which the answer concludes, "There IS at least another factor in addition to or excluding average temperature". I don't see why this must be true. Why can't we have a different function with the same variable? For example, let's assume a variable for Average Temp = X, then the decision of the boundaries of Hardiness Zones is directly proportional to X. Why can't the second set of zones also just be a function of X. Length of trees = X^2 - 2X + e^X. Now both Types of zones are correlated but some of the trees in Type 1 might not be included in Type 2 due to a different relationship and/or different criteria in selecting the boundaries (different quantitative limits, for example)
2) I am aware that this piece of information is irrelevant to getting the right answer. Since "13 zones" is not mentioned explicitly (the only zones that are mentioned are Zone 1, 4, 6 and 13) whereas in the other type it is clearly mentioned that it has 11 zones. So, given a similar construction on the actual GMAT, are we supposed to assume that there are 13 zones. Now if one thinks it is only logical to assume zones in serial order, there are various real life examples with a discontinuity in labeling zones, one example, the area I live in doesn't have zone 3 and 5 but has a 1, 2, 4 and 6, since inception. In market demand analysis, zones are also denoted as Zone 1, 3, 9, 20, 34, etc, to compare the volume of demand among zones and to bring out the relevant heat factor in a heat map.
A reply would be greatly appreciated!!
Kudos to all!
Best,
Yohann
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
AmoyV wrote:
The U.S. Department of Agriculture divides the North American continent into “hardiness zones.” These zones are based on the average winter temperature and are used to determine what types of plants will likely survive in a given area. Zone 1 represents the coldest average winter temperature and zone 13 the warmest. The zones are closely correlated with, but do not exactly match another set of eleven zones that indicate the length of the growing season. Minneapolis is in hardiness zone 4 and Denver is in hardiness zone 6.
Which of the following statements is most supported by the information above?
A. During the coming winter, the lowest recorded temperature in Minneapolis will be lower than the lowest recorded temperature in Denver.
B. The growing season in Denver is much longer than the growing season in Minneapolis.
C. A greater variety of plants can be grown in Denver, due to the warmer average winter low.
D. Factors other than average winter temperature affect the length of the growing season.
E. At least one U.S. city has a colder average winter temperature than does Minneapolis.
Responding to a pm:
There is absolutely no ambiguity in this question.
Premises:
- Hardiness zones are based on the average winter temperature and are used to determine what types of plants will likely survive in a given area.
- Zone 1 represents the coldest average winter temperature and zone 13 the warmest.
- The zones are correlated with, but do not exactly match another set of eleven zones that indicate the length of the growing season - probably colder means shorter growing season from common knowledge
- Minneapolis is in hardiness zone 4 and Denver is in hardiness zone 6.
A. During the coming winter, the lowest recorded temperature in Minneapolis will be lower than the lowest recorded temperature in Denver.
We only know about average temperatures, not lowest.
B. The growing season in Denver is much longer than the growing season in Minneapolis.
Hardiness zones do not match the eleven "length of growing season" zone.
C. A greater variety of plants can be grown in Denver, due to the warmer average winter low.
No information about whether more variety survives in warm climate or cold - we will not use our general knowledge.
D. Factors other than average winter temperature affect the length of the growing season.
It is given that zones are correlated but DO NOT match exactly. It means other factors also come into play. Correct answer.
E. At least one U.S. city has a colder average winter temperature than does Minneapolis.
If you feel that "city" vs "area/town/piece of land" is nitpicking, then that's not correct. Perhaps a small wild piece of land right next to Canada lies in the hardiness zones 1, 2 and 3. Perhaps only some forest/mountain region lies in the first 3 zones. Perhaps no city lies in these zones since a city invariably ends up being warmer than the wild due to industrial activity. We don't know.
-
But more importantly, North American continent includes not just US but also Canada and Mexico. Hence, even if you ignore the difference between city/town etc, nothing says that a US city must lie in first three zones. US and North America are not interchangeable!
11 Jul 2018, 16:14
close
