Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 11:17 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 11:17

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 721 [183]
Given Kudos: 52
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Status:Far, far away!
Posts: 859
Own Kudos [?]: 4889 [47]
Given Kudos: 219
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7773 [30]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Status:Far, far away!
Posts: 859
Own Kudos [?]: 4889 [17]
Given Kudos: 219
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
13
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
lucasITA wrote:
but where i can read the inference about "ten percent of all self-employed persons" ?' i've understood the general meaning of option D but it contains a very specific statement that i can't understand, and this is why in 4 minutes i could not answer the question :| :(


The point of B is not the number 10%.

It can be inferred that the "ownership gap" (see underlined text) would be narrowed if which of the following were to occur?

This is the definition of the gap:"At the time, minorities constituted seventeen percent of the nation's population, but only four percent of the nation's self-employed. "

The gap would be narrowed if the "percentage of self-employed minority persons rose" to an higher level, period.
I can be 10%,11% or 10.5%: it does not matter; the question says "would be narrowed if which of the following were to occur", so if the answer choice say "the percentage is higher (does not matter the numerical value itself) the answer is correct.

D: The percentage of self-employed minority persons rose to more than ten percent of all self-employed persons.<==CORRECT

Hope I've explained myself well.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2013
Status:GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: EnterMBA
Posts: 112
Own Kudos [?]: 280 [17]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
GRE 1: Q790 V710
GPA: 3.3
WE:Editorial and Writing (Education)
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
14
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Q3 asks about "in 1970". The second paragraph mentions that "in 1970" the stated main goal was to increase the number of minority-owned businesses. The subsequent sentences identify this as the "ownership gap". Hence B is correct.

The focus on assisting minority-owned firms with growth potential occurred only in the late 1970s, not "in 1970". Note that the question does not ask "in the 1970s."
Retired Moderator
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Status:On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Posts: 261
Own Kudos [?]: 655 [14]
Given Kudos: 134
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
10
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Time taken: 9:08 mins
1. It can be inferred that the "ownership gap" (see highlighted text) would be narrowed if which of the following were to occur?
A. Minority entrepreneurs received a percentage of government contracts equal to that received by nonminority entrepreneurs.Nothing like that
B. Middle- and high-income minority entrepreneurs gave more assistance to their low-income counterparts in the business community.Help is to be given by the govt not only to low-income people but also to middle and high income people in some cases
C. Minority entrepreneurs hired a percentage of minority employees equal to the percentage of minority residents in their own communities.Question is to increase % of self-employed. Not the % of employed
D. The percentage of self-employed minority persons rose to more than ten percent of all self-employed persons.This increases the % of self-employed and decreases the gap
E. Seventeen percent of all persons employed in small businesses were self-employed.We are concerned about minorities here not the total population.


2. According to the passage, in 1970 funding to minority entrepreneurs focused primarily on which of the following?
A. Alleviating chronic unemployment in urban areasWe are concerned about self-employment and not total employment
B. Narrowing the ownership gapYes
C. Assisting minority-owned businesses with growth potentialThis was a thing of the past and subsequently was adopted again in the future. But is not part of our time frame in question.
D. Awarding subcontracts to businesses that encouraged community developmentNo mention of community development
E. Targeting the most economically disadvantaged minority-owned businessesTake out the "most" and this could be the right answer.


3. Which of the following best describes the function of the second paragraph in the passage as a whole?
A. It narrows the scope of the topic introduced in the first paragraph.It gives a part of the history of enactment of the assistance
B. It presents an example of the type of change discussed in the first paragraph.It is an example of the many changes that the execution of the law went through
C. It cites the most striking instance of historical change in a particular government policy.Yes. It is the first of the many historical changes
D. It explains the rationale for the creation of the government agency whose operations are discussed in the first paragraph.Doesnt do that
E. It presents the results of policies adopted by the federal government.Doesnt do that


4. The passage mentions which of the following as a basic consideration in administering minority-business funding programs?
A. Coming up with funding for the programsIt is govt funded. No problem mentioned in the passage reagrading funding
B. Encouraging government agencies to assist middle and high-income minority entrepreneursNo problem with this mentioned
C. Recognizing the profit potential of small service businesses in urban communitiesNothing in the passage to support this
D. Determining who should be the recipients of the fundingThere were a lot of times the policy changed and each time the policy changed, it changed wrt who would receive the funding.
E. Determining which entrepreneurs are likely to succeedNothing to support this in the passage


5. The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. discuss historical changes in a government policy Yes. It does that
B. describe the role of Congress in regulating the work of the SBANope. The Congress is not even mentioned after the 1st paragraph, where it passed the policy.
C. contrast types of funding sources used by minority businessesHere only 1 type of funding ie govt funding is discussed. No mention or contrasting different funding
D. correct a misconception about minority entrepreneurshipPassage shows the ways a policy was enacted. There is nothing in the passage to support this option
E. advocate an alternative approach to funding minority entrepreneursThere is no mention of any other funding in the passage and hence govt funding may not be the "alternative approach of funding minority entrepreneurs"
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 344
Own Kudos [?]: 4585 [9]
Given Kudos: 606
Concentration: Technology, Other
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
8
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Time taken 13 mins.

1. It can be inferred that the "ownership gap" (see highlighted text) would be narrowed if which of the following were to occur?
D. The percentage of self-employed minority persons rose to more than ten percent of all self-employed persons.
"At the time, minorities constituted seventeen percent of the nation's population, but only four percent of the nation's self- employed. This ownership gap was held to be the result of past discrimination. Increasing the number of minority-owned firms was seen as a way to remedy this problem."

2. According to the passage, in 1970 funding to minority entrepreneurs focused primarily on which of the following?
B. Narrowing the ownership gap
"The first shift occurred during the early 1970's. While the goal of assisting the economically disadvantaged entrepreneur remained, a new goal emerged: to remedy the effects of past discrimination. In fact, in 1970 the SBA explicitly stated that their main goal was to increase the number of minority-owned businesses"

3. Which of the following best describes the function of the second paragraph in the passage as a whole?
B. It presents an example of the type of change discussed in the first paragraph.
"Since then, the answer given to the fundamental question of who the recipients should be—the most economically disadvantaged or those with the best prospects for business success—has changed, and the social goals of the programs have shifted, resulting in policy changes.

The first shift occurred during the early 1970's"

4. The passage mentions which of the following as a basic consideration in administering minority-business funding programs?
D. Determining who should be the recipients of the funding
"A 1967 amendment to the Economic Opportunity Act directed the SBA to pay special attention to minority-owned businesses located in urban or rural areas characterized by high proportions of unemployed or low-income individuals. Since then, the answer given to the fundamental question of who the recipients should be"

5. The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. discuss historical changes in a government policy
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7773 [6]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
3
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
C adds an extreme element ("most striking") that isn't supported by the passage. Perhaps that change seemed more striking to you than the change in paragraph 3, but this isn't established in the passage. B is milder, and so easier to support. One way to think about it is that there's no way for C to be true without B also being true. Therefore, there's no justification for eliminating B and selecting C.
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1115
Own Kudos [?]: 2162 [5]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
5
Kudos
Passage Map
P1: Intro discussion on US government's assistance of small businesses
P2: Discuss shift in focus of assistance to aid minorities own businesses to remedy past discrim.
P3: Discuss a second shift - focus on growth of minority owned businesses

Q1 - Inference
P2 states that providing funding to middle and high-income bracket entrepreneurs seems justified because of the ownership gap.

A - It's nowhere stated or inferred that non minorities were given an advantage in the awarding of contracts
B - This isn't what we should deduce. The gap exists because 17% of the pop = minority, but only 4% are self employed
C - Doesn't make sense as the gap is in self-employed, not employed persons. Incorrect.
D - This is the only thing that makes sense. If only 4% of all self-employed are minorities, then obviously the gap between 4 and 17% would decrease if the percentage increased to above 10%.
E - this twists what we are told. We are told that only 4% of all self-employed are minorities, but 17% of the population are minorities... don't get it twisted. Incorrect

Q2 - Detail
What are we told the 1970 funding focused on?
p2 describes the 197- funding - essentially focused on bringing up # minority owned businesses

A - No - not
B - this is correct. Ownership gap is what we are targeting. What ownership gap? The gap in ownership mentioned above... 4% ownership.
C - this was the goal of the late 1970s, not 1970 itself. Incorrect
D - No. This was a former goal. Incorrect.
E - No. They were targeting minority-owned businesses in general.

Q3 - Function/ Purpose
The second passage really just recalls the next step taken and the shift in focus of the SBA to alleviating gaps in the number of minority owned businesses.
A - It doesn't really narrow the scope. It does talk more specifically about the topic, but there is a shift in scope to the change that occured.
B - At the end of p1 we are told "the answer to the fundamental question of who the recipients should be ..has changed". P2 then goes on to discuss who those recipients should be- minority owners/ self-employed. So B is correct.
C - incorrect. I don't know if this is the most 'striking instance', but I doubt it.
D - Incorrect. Completely off the mark.
E - Its not really a result - a type of change in policy is discussed. Incorrect

Q4 - Detail
Administering minority business funding is discussed in P1 and then throughout here and there.

We are told "the fundamental question of who the recipients should be" in p1 though, so that's D straight away.

A is incorrect - nowhere discussed. We are just told that the funding is federally supplemented.
B is incorrect because we are told this is more elaborate decision made down the track... what's more basic? B or D?
C No - the growth potential of small-minority ownd businesses is considered in the late 1970s, but nowhere is profit mentioned.
E - This is a question posed in the 1970s reforms - not so basic though.

Q5 - Main Idea
B is incorrect - is congress even mentioned?
C is incorrect - where are multiple sources mentioned let alone contrasted?
D is incorrect - no misconception is mentioned. Historical changes are traced.
E is incorrect - nothing is really advocated, let alone an alternate approach

Thus A is correct.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63648 [3]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
1
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Ravindra.here wrote:
GMATNinja can you please explain how option d is correct in the last question. I think
determining succesful entrepreneurs was the goal . Please explain this

Quote:
4. The passage mentions which of the following as a basic consideration in administering minority-business funding programs?

(A) Coming up with the funding for the programs
(B) Encouraging government agencies to assist middle- and high-income minority entrepreneurs
(C) Recognizing the profit potential of small service businesses in urban communities
(D) Determining who should be the recipients of the funding
(E) Determining which entrepreneurs are likely to succeed

Refer to the last sentence of the first paragraph: "Since [the 1967 amendment], the answer given to the fundamental question of who the recipients should be—the most economically disadvantaged or those with the best prospects for business success—has changed, and the social goals of the programs have shifted, resulting in policy changes."

The fact that the recipients have changed tell us that those administering the programs are considering WHO should receive the funding. If choice (D) were not a basic consideration, then those administering the programs would NOT ask the fundamental question of who the recipients should be. We are told that the question of who the recipients should be (i.e. which groups should be given funding) is fundamental, impacting the basic goals and directions of such programs.

The passage mentions a couple shifts in policy that impacted who received funding. For example, "in 1970 the SBA explicitly stated that their main goal was to increase the number of minority-owned businesses." In the late 1970s, one agency adopted "the goal of creating and assisting more minority-owned substantive firms with future growth potential."

However, the passage makes no mention of analyzing/predicting which entrepreneurs are likely to succeed. Choosing the individual people and businesses within those groups might be a secondary question that involves considering which entrepreneurs are likely to succeed, but the passage does not talk about such considerations.

Thus, (D) is a better answer than (E).
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 204
Own Kudos [?]: 557 [2]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
2
Kudos
For the last question I was confused between B and D as it mentions primary goal in 1970s

early 1970s - ownership gap
late 1970s - assisting minority-owned firms with future growth potential

At the start of the 2nd para it says
The first shift occured during the early 1970's. While the goal of assisting the economically disadvantaged entrepreneur remained, (Indicates answer is D)

But then again I think I missed this sentence
for example, the goal of increasing numbers of minority-owned firms was supplanted by the goal of creating and assisting more minority-owned substantive firms with future growth potential (indicates answer is B)

Is that the point I missed?
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 587
Own Kudos [?]: 3155 [2]
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Since I got this wrong, I have a query.

According to the passage, in 1970 funding to minority entrepreneurs focused primarily on which of the following?

A: Alleviating chronic unemployment in urban areas
B: Narrowing the ownership gap
C: Assisting minority-owned businesses with growth potential
D: Awarding subcontracts to businesses that encouraged community development
E: Targeting the most economically disadvantaged minority-owned businesses

Para 2 concentrates on early 1970 and para 3 concentrates on late 1970's.

Para 2 talks about ownership GAP created by the past discrimination. However, para 3 talks about the focus shift of policy to assisting minority based business having growth potential not solely awarding minority business which was economically disadvantaged.

Please suggest

Rgds,
TGC!
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42102 [2]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
Quote:
In Q1 how did you eliminate option E. Could you please explain it?


The passage talks about 17% of the total population of the US. E talks about Seventeen percent of all persons employed in small businesses. E is out of scope.


Quote:
Also, for Q3, how do we know that passage is talking about early 1970.. Question doesn't mention this.. It can be late 1970's as well. Can you please explain this as well?


Please note C talk about the specific year of 1970. It is not concerned about any early - 1970' or - 1970's or late -1970s.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63648 [2]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply

Question 4


abhola wrote:
GMATNinja wrote:

The fact that the recipients have changed tell us that those administering the programs are considering WHO should receive the funding. If choice (D) were not a basic consideration, then those administering the programs would NOT ask the fundamental question of who the recipients should be. We are told that the question of who the recipients should be (i.e. which groups should be given funding) is fundamental, impacting the basic goals and directions of such programs.

The passage mentions a couple shifts in policy that impacted who received funding. For example, "in 1970 the SBA explicitly stated that their main goal was to increase the number of minority-owned businesses." In the late 1970s, one agency adopted "the goal of creating and assisting more minority-owned substantive firms with future growth potential."

However, the passage makes no mention of analyzing/predicting which entrepreneurs are likely to succeed. Choosing the individual people and businesses within those groups might be a secondary question that involves considering which entrepreneurs are likely to succeed, but the passage does not talk about such considerations.

Thus, (D) is a better answer than (E).



Hi GMATNinja

Can I interpret the above explanation as follows:

In the battle of D vs E:

E is wrong because E is not the most basic consideration.
Knowing what firms are likely to succeed comes AFTER once you have decided who the funding recipients should be (option D).

I choice E because, simply, D looked too simple to be true :')

Any suggestions on how should I control this urge?

Thank you!

For RC questions that ask about specific details in the passage, it's best to find the most relevant piece of the passage first and then answer the question with the exact language of the passage in mind.

Question 4 asks which answer choice is mentioned as a "basic consideration" in administering minority-business funding programs. As we pointed out in our earlier explanation, the most relevant portion of the passage to answer this question is at the end of the first paragraph, where we learn that a "fundamental question" is "who the recipients should be."

With that context in mind, (D) is clearly mentioned as a basic consideration, while (E) is not.

Is (D) too simple to be true? Not at all! The way to resist this kind of thinking is to realize that the people who write the test are not trying to trick you. If they ask for a detail mentioned in the passage, go find that detail and answer the question accordingly.

That's not to say that RC questions can't be hard. Sometimes details are difficult to parse, or the language is very convoluted, or they ask for a nuanced inference. But the questions are asked in good faith, so all you can do is hone and refine your process to give yourself the best shot at answering questions accurately. There's no need to make your life harder by worrying that an answer choice is too simple to be true. :)

I hope that helps!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2015
Posts: 172
Own Kudos [?]: 600 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
WE:Investment Banking (Venture Capital)
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
ksung84 wrote:
The United States government has a long-standing policy of using federal funds to keep small business viable. The Small Business Act of 1953 authorized the Small Business Administration (SBA) to enter into contracts with government agencies having procurement powers and to arrange for fulfillment of these contracts by awarding subcontracts to small businesses. In the mid 1960's, during the war on poverty years, Congress hoped to encourage minority entrepreneurs by directing such funding to minority businesses. At first this funding was directed toward minority entrepreneurs with very low incomes. A 1967 amendment to the Economic Opportunity Act directed the SBA to pay special attention to minority-owned businesses located in urban or rural areas characterized by high proportions of unemployed or low-income individuals. Since then, the answer given to the fundamental question of who the recipients should be-the most economically disadvantaged or those with the best prospects for business success-has changed, and the social goals of the programs have shifted, resulting in policy changes.

The first shift occured during the early 1970's. While the goal of assisting the economically disadvantaged entrepreneur remained, a new goal emerged: to remedy the effects of past discrimination. In fact, in 1970 the SBA explicitly stated that their main goal was to increase the number of minority-owned buinesses. At the time, minorities constituted seventeen percent of the nation's population, but only four percent of the nation's self-employed. This ownership gap was held to be the result of past discrimination. Increasing the number of minority-owned firms was seen as a way to remedy this problem. In that context, providing funding to minority entrepreneurs in middle- and high-income brackets seemed justified.

In the late 1970's, the goals of minority-business funding programs shifted again. At the minority business Development Agency, for example, the goal of increasing numbers of minority-owned firms was supplanted by the goal of creating and assisting more minority-owned substantive firms with future growth potential. Assisting manufacturers or wholesalers became far more important than assisting small service businesses. Minority-business funding programs were now justified as instruments for economic development, particularly for creating jobs in minority communities of high unemployment.
It can be inferred that the "ownership gap" (see underlined text) would be narrowed if which of the following were to occur?

A: Minority entrepreneurs received a percentage of government contracts equal to that received by nonminority entrepreneurs.
B: Middle- and high-income minority entrepreneurs gave more assistance to their low-income counterparts in the business community.
C: Minority entrepreneurs hired a percentage of minority emlpoyees equal to the percentage of minority residents in their own communities.
D: The percentage of self-employed minority persons rose to more than ten percent of all self-employed persons.
E: Seventeen percent of all persons employed in small businesses were self-employed.



Which of the following best describes the function of the second paragraph in the passage as a whole?

A: It narrows the scope of the topic introduced in the first paragraph.
B: It presents an example of the type of change discuseed in the first paragraph.
C: It cites the most striking instance of historical change in a particular government policy.
D: It explains the rationale for the creation of the government agency whose operations are discussed in the first paragraph.
E: It presents the results of policies adpoted by the federal government.




According to the passage, in 1970 funding to minority entrepreneurs focused primarily on which of the following?

A: Alleviating chronic unemployment in urban areas
B: Narrowing the ownership gap
C: Assisting minority-owned businesses with growth potential
D: Awarding subcontracts to businesses that encouraged community development
E: Targeting the most economically disadvantaged minority-owned businesses




tough passage.

Q2 -- what makes A/C "B" better than "A"? It is true that in the 2nd paragraph, the scope is literally confined to "remedy the effects of past discrimination" -- as in, that's literally the only thing going on in that paragraph. I don't necessarily see how "A" is wrong (I was debating hard between "A" & "B")

Q3 -- what makes "B" correct? From paragraph 3, it is pretty clear that the "goal of increasing the # of minority-owned firms" was "supplanted by the goal of creating and assisting minority-owned firms WITH GROWTH POTENTIAL". Doesn't "C" literally spell this out?


^ need explanation b/c otherwise, this seems really controversial
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63648 [1]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
adkikani wrote:
GMATNinja GMATNinjatwo

Quote:
1. It can be inferred that the "ownership gap" (see underlined text) would be narrowed if which of the following were to occur?

(A) Minority entrepreneurs received a percentage of government contracts equal to that received by nonminority entrepreneurs.
(B) Middle- and high-income minority entrepreneurs gave more assistance to their low-income counterparts in the business community.
(C) Minority entrepreneurs hired a percentage of minority employees equal to the percentage of minority residents in their own communities.
(D) The percentage of self-employed minority persons rose to more than ten percent of all self-employed persons.
(E) Seventeen percent of all persons employed in small businesses were self-employed.


Relevant text in passage:

Quote:
In fact, in 1970 the SBA explicitly stated that their main goal was to increase the number of minority-owned businesses. At the time, minorities constituted seventeen percent of the nation's population, but only four percent of the nation's self-employed. This ownership gap was held to be the result of past discrimination. Increasing the number of minority-owned firms was seen as a way to remedy this problem.


I did not see 'self-employed' word in (D) I had to guess on this one since none of PoE took me to correct choice
as I found none of choices to be mentioned in passage.

adkikani, the word self-employed appears both in choice (D) and in the passage, as highlighted above. The ownership gap is the difference between the total percentage of the population (17%) and the percentage of self-employed people (4%). Increasing the percentage of self-employed minority persons would indeed help close this gap.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Posts: 792
Own Kudos [?]: 683 [1]
Given Kudos: 1316
Location: India
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Pet700 wrote:

bm2201,
But I don't understand how can that be an "example"ò. Isn't it something specific? it's saying the first shift occurred... it does not sound like an example to me...Please help.



Hi Pet700,

I believe your doubt is related to the 2nd Question.

2. Which of the following best describes the function of the second paragraph in the passage as a whole?

Quote:
(B) It presents an example of the type of change discussed in the first paragraph.


the type of change discussed in the first paragraph : "Since then, the answer given to the fundamental question of who the recipients should be—the most economically disadvantaged or those with the best prospects for business success—has changed, and the social goals of the programs have shifted, resulting in policy changes." and then the author goes on to mention about the first shift that occurred in occurred during the early 1970's, where in a new goal to remedy the effects of past discrimination emerged.

Thus we can infer that the 2nd para is an example of the type of change discussed in the first paragraph and the passage as a whole. It is an example in terms of how the shift in the social goals of the programs started. Author uses the second paragraph to support the context that has been set in the previous paragraph.


Hope This Helps.
Thanks.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2015
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Schools: ISB '16
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
please help with below RC with explanation of the answer :-

A recent study has provided clues to predator-prey dynamics in the late Pleistocene era. Researchers compared the number of tooth fractures in present-day carnivores with tooth fractures in carnivores that lived 36,000 to 10,000 years ago and that were preserved in the Rancho La Brea tar pits in Los Angeles. The breakage frequencies in the extinct species were strikingly higher than those in the present-day species.

In considering possible explanations for this finding, the researchers dismissed demographic bias because older individuals were not overrepresented in the fossil samples. They rejected preservational bias because a total absence of breakage in two extinct species demonstrated that the fractures were not the result of abrasion within the pits. They ruled out local bias because breakage data obtained from other Pleistocene sites were similar to the La Brea data. The explanation they consider most plausible is behavioral differences between extinct and present-day carnivores--in particular, more contact between the teeth of predators and the bones of prey due to more thorough consumption of carcasses by the extinct species. Such thorough carcass consumption implies to the researchers either that prey availability was low, at least seasonally, or that there was intense competition over kills and a high rate of carcass theft due to relatively high predator densities.

Question.

The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) present several explanations for a well-known fact
(B) suggest alternative methods for resolving a debate
(C) argue in favor of a controversial theory
(D) question the methodology used in a study
(E) discuss the implications of a research finding
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 33
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
aksol66:

5. The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. discuss historical changes in a government policy Yes. It does that
B. describe the role of Congress in regulating the work of the SBA Nope. The Congress is not even mentioned after the 1st paragraph, where it passed the policy.
C. contrast types of funding sources used by minority businesses .Here only 1 type of funding ie govt funding is discussed. No mention or contrasting different funding
D. correct a misconception about minority entrepreneurship . Passage shows the ways a policy was enacted. There is nothing in the passage to support this option
E. advocate an alternative approach to funding minority entrepreneurs There is no mention of any other funding in the passage and hence govt funding may not be the "alternative approach of funding minority entrepreneurs"

P.S : copied the answer from above ,but i agree with his analysis
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 36
Own Kudos [?]: 45 [0]
Given Kudos: 334
Location: India
Schools: LBS '18 ISB '19
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V26
GPA: 3.21
Send PM
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
ksung84 wrote:
The United States government has a long-standing policy of using federal funds to keep small business viable. The Small Business Act of 1953 authorized the Small Business Administration (SBA) to enter into contracts with government agencies having procurement powers and to arrange for fulfillment of these contracts by awarding subcontracts to small businesses. In the mid 1960's, during the war on poverty years, Congress hoped to encourage minority entrepreneurs by directing such funding to minority businesses. At first this funding was directed toward minority entrepreneurs with very low incomes. A 1967 amendment to the Economic Opportunity Act directed the SBA to pay special attention to minority-owned businesses located in urban or rural areas characterized by high proportions of unemployed or low-income individuals. Since then, the answer given to the fundamental question of who the recipients should be—the most economically disadvantaged or those with the best prospects for business success—has changed, and the social goals of the programs have shifted, resulting in policy changes.

The first shift occured during the early 1970's. While the goal of assisting the economically disadvantaged entrepreneur remained, a new goal emerged: to remedy the effects of past discrimination. In fact, in 1970 the SBA explicitly stated that their main goal was to increase the number of minority-owned buinesses. At the time, minorities constituted seventeen percent of the nation's population, but only four percent of the nation's self-employed. This ownership gap was held to be the result of past discrimination. Increasing the number of minority-owned firms was seen as a way to remedy this problem. In that context, providing funding to minority entrepreneurs in middle- and high-income brackets seemed justified.

In the late 1970's, the goals of minority-business funding programs shifted again. At the minority business Development Agency, for example, the goal of increasing numbers of minority-owned firms was supplanted by the goal of creating and assisting more minority-owned substantive firms with future growth potential. Assisting manufacturers or wholesalers became far more important than assisting small service businesses. Minority-business funding programs were now justified as instruments for economic development, particularly for creating jobs in minority communities of high unemployment.
1. It can be inferred that the "ownership gap" (see underlined text) would be narrowed if which of the following were to occur?

(A) Minority entrepreneurs received a percentage of government contracts equal to that received by nonminority entrepreneurs.
(B) Middle- and high-income minority entrepreneurs gave more assistance to their low-income counterparts in the business community.
(C) Minority entrepreneurs hired a percentage of minority emlpoyees equal to the percentage of minority residents in their own communities.
(D) The percentage of self-employed minority persons rose to more than ten percent of all self-employed persons.
(E) Seventeen percent of all persons employed in small businesses were self-employed.




2. Which of the following best describes the function of the second paragraph in the passage as a whole?

(A) It narrows the scope of the topic introduced in the first paragraph.
(B) It presents an example of the type of change discuseed in the first paragraph.
(C) It cites the most striking instance of historical change in a particular government policy.
(D) It explains the rationale for the creation of the government agency whose operations are discussed in the first paragraph.
(E) It presents the results of policies adpoted by the federal government.




3. According to the passage, in 1970 funding to minority entrepreneurs focused primarily on which of the following?

(A) Alleviating chronic unemployment in urban areas
(B) Narrowing the ownership gap
(C) Assisting minority-owned businesses with growth potential
(D) Awarding subcontracts to businesses that encouraged community development
(E) Targeting the most economically disadvantaged minority-owned businesses




4. The passage mentions which of the following as a basic consideration in administering minority-business funding programs?

(A) Coming up with the funding for the programs
(B) Encouraging government agencies to assist middle- and high-income minority entrepreneurs
(C) Recognizing the profit potential of small service businesses in urban communities
(D) Determining who should be the recipients of the funding
(E) Determining which entrepreneurs are likely to succeed





GMATNinja can you please explain how option d is correct in the last question. I think
determining succesful entrepreneurs was the goal . Please explain this
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The United States government has a long-standing policy of using feder [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13957 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne