All correct except Q3 in 13 mins, including 4 mins 45 seconds to read
Para 1- SC resolutions have not always pleased Native Americans, accommodation
Para 2- power of the Supreme Court has been exercised has in a manner that has been beneficial(minor issue) or not wholly detrimental(larger issues) for natives
Para 3- achievements of Judicial system- rules of judicial construction that, in general, favor the rights of Native American litigants.
Para 4- the protection that has been provided against encroachment by the states into tribal affairs.
1. According to the passage, one reason why the United States Supreme Court “has not always resolved legal issues of concern to Native Americans in a manner that has pleased the Indian nations” (lines 1–4) is that(E) the Court has made political compromises in deciding some cases
Many of the Court’s decisions have been products of political compromise that looked more to the temper of the times than to enduring principles of law.
2. It can be inferred that the objections raised by the critics mentioned in line 18 would be most clearly answered by a United States Supreme Court decision that(A) demonstrated respect for Native Americans and the principles and qualities they consider important
Some critics point to the patronizing tone of many Court opinions and the apparent rejection of Native American values as important points to consider when reviewing a case.
3. It can be inferred that the author calls the judicial system of the United States “accommodating” (line 10) primarily in order to(A) suggest that the decisions of the United States Supreme Court have been less favorable to Native Americans than most people believe
(B) suggest that the United States Supreme Court should be more supportive of the goals of Native Americans
(C) suggest a reason why the decisions of the United States Supreme Court have not always favored Native Americans
(D) indicate that the United States Supreme Court has made creditable efforts to recognize the values of Native Americans
(E) indicate that the United States Supreme Court attempts to be fair to all parties to a case
AjiteshArun ,
GMATNinja ,
MagooshExpert ,
GMATGuruNY ,
VeritasPrepBrian ,
MartyTargetTestPrep ,
DmitryFarber ,
VeritasKarishma ,
generis ,
jennpt ,
VeritasPrepErika , other experts - please provide your inputs for question 3
4. The author’s attitude toward the United States Supreme Court’s resolution of legal issues of concern to Native Americans can best be described as one of(A) wholehearted endorsement- incorrect, Certainly there have been decisions that cast doubt on the validity of this assertion
(B) restrained appreciation- Correct
(C) detached objectivity- incorrect, the author is not completely objective as he specifies his appreciation in para 3 and 4
(D) cautious opposition- incorrect, the author does not oppose
(E) suppressed exasperation- incorrect, the author is not annoyed
5. It can be inferred that the author believes that the extension of the states’ powers and jurisdictions with respect to Native American affairs would be(D) detrimental to the interests of Native Americans- Correct
A second achievement of the judicial system is the protection that has been provided against encroachment by the states into tribal affairs.
6. The author’s primary purpose is to(A) contrast opposing views- incorrect, no opposing views have been contrasted
(B) reevaluate traditional beliefs- incorrect, no traditional beliefs are been reevaluated
(C) reconcile divergent opinions- incorrect
(D) assess the claims made by disputants- incorrect
(E) provide evidence to support a contention- Correct, the contention is whether SC has resolved legal issues of concern to Native Americans in a manner that has been beneficial for the Native Americans
7. It can be inferred that the author believes the United States Supreme Court’s treatment of Native Americans to have been(A) irreproachable on legal grounds- incorrect
(B) reasonably supportive in most situations- Correct,
it is worth noting that the power of the Supreme Court has been exercised in a manner that has usually been beneficial to Native Americans, at least on minor issues, and has not been wholly detrimental on the larger, more important issues.
(C) guided by enduring principles of law- incorrect, Many of the Court’s decisions have been products of political compromise that looked more to the temper of the times than to enduring principles of law.
(D) misguided but generally harmless- incorrect
(E) harmful only in a few minor cases - incorrect, it is worth noting that the power of the Supreme Court has been exercised in a manner that has usually been beneficial to Native
Americans, at least on minor issues, and has not been wholly detrimental on the larger, more important issues.