Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 01:16 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 01:16

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92892
Own Kudos [?]: 618668 [22]
Given Kudos: 81585
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2017
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 44 [1]
Given Kudos: 42
GMAT 1: 570 Q49 V19
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 62 [0]
Given Kudos: 22
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 May 2016
Posts: 119
Own Kudos [?]: 369 [0]
Given Kudos: 124
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.5
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has ne [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has nearly doubled in the past 8 years. It is clear that this increase has prevented child fatalities that otherwise would have occurred, because although the number of children aged 4 and under who were killed while riding in cars involved in accidents rose 10 percent over the past 8 years, the total number of serious automobile accidents rose by 20 percent during that period.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?


(A) Some of the automobile safety seats purchased for children under 4 continue to be used after the child reaches the age of 5.

(B) The proportion of serious automobile accidents involving child passengers has remained constant over the past 8 years.

(C) Children are taking more trips in cars today than they were 8 years ago, but the average total time they spend in cars has remained constant.

(D) The sharpest increase in the use of automobile safety seats over the past 8 years has been for children over the age of 2.

(E) The number of fatalities among adults involved in automobile accidents rose by 10 percent over the past 8 years.

The answer is B. If we say proportion has remained constant, we clearly assume/say that number of rides of kids below 4 years has increased and fatalities have decreased
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Posts: 181
Own Kudos [?]: 254 [0]
Given Kudos: 130
Location: Peru
Send PM
The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has ne [#permalink]
(B) is correct

If we say that the proportion of serious automobile accidents involving child has remained constant, then this one help us discard the possibility that this increase in accidents (10%) happened because we got a greater proportion of accidents involving child vs total number of serious automobile accidents and hence reinforce that safety seats helped to get this result.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Mar 2020
Posts: 40
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 88
Send PM
Re: The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has ne [#permalink]
Can someone please explain the question?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Apr 2020
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Viet Nam
Send PM
Re: The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has ne [#permalink]
Krishchamp wrote:
Can someone please explain the question?


HI,
The question:
The increase in the use of automobile seats by < 4 years old children has prevented child fatalities because:
- The number of < 4 years old children rose 10% but the total serious accidents rose by 20%.
We want to strengthen the conclusion.
We can strengthen by showing that the number of children involved in serious accidents was increased by more than 10%.
In Choice B: The proportion of serious automobile accidents involving child passengers has remained constant over the past 8 years
It means that if there was 1 children involved in each accidents 8 years ago, there is still 1 children involved in each accidents now. Therefore, if the number of serious accidents rose by 20%, the number of children involved in serious accidents also rose by 20%.

Hence, B strengthen the conclusion.

Hope that help!
CEO
CEO
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 2552
Own Kudos [?]: 1813 [0]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has ne [#permalink]
The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has nearly doubled in the past 8 years. It is clear that this increase has prevented child fatalities that otherwise would have occurred, because although the number of children aged 4 and under who were killed while riding in cars involved in accidents rose 10 percent over the past 8 years, the total number of serious automobile accidents rose by 20 percent during that period.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Some of the automobile safety seats purchased for children under 4 continue to be used after the child reaches the age of 5. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

(B) The proportion of serious automobile accidents involving child passengers has remained constant over the past 8 years. - CORRECT. Only then the claim of increase of child fatalities having increased would make sense.

(C) Children are taking more trips in cars today than they were 8 years ago, but the average total time they spend in cars has remained constant. - WRONG. Goes against and thus weakens.

(D) The sharpest increase in the use of automobile safety seats over the past 8 years has been for children over the age of 2. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

(E) The number of fatalities among adults involved in automobile accidents rose by 10 percent over the past 8 years. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

Answer B.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17208
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has ne [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has ne [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne