It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 19:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 351

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2006, 06:42
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with humans longer than either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species.

A. in isolation from contact with humans longer than
B. isolated from contact with humans longer than
C. in isolation from contact with humans longer than were
D. isolated from contact with humans longer than were
E. in isolation and without contacts with humans longer than

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 788

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

Location: BULGARIA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2006, 07:00
In order, to have correct comparison we need " longer than WERE"
Narrowing down to C and D. Since there is no subject in the sentence if we use "were isolated" construction then it is not clear who or what isolated the species. Think that C eliminates this flaw.
IMO C

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 258

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2006, 09:13
D for me too.

isolated from is the correct usage.

without "were" the meaning is not clear -

X were in contact with Y longer than Z

is this comparing between X - Y v/s Y-Z or X-Y v/s Z-Y ?

X were in contact with Y longer than were Z

this is clearly comparing X-Y v/s Z-Y

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2006, 09:26
it is b/w C and D due to "were" for ||sm

now... "in isolation from" vs. "isolated from" IMO both are correct usage, but they mean different things:

"in isolation from" means that nobody isolated them whereas "isolated from" implies the action that someone "isolated them from humans"...

and since the original says that there was no such action I choose C, because D changes the meaning

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 444

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2006, 12:11
I wonder why this question looks so familiar to me...
Take a look at Q224 from OG10 :lol:

Inuits of the Bering Sea were in isolation from contact with Europeans longer than Aleuts or Inuits of the North Pacific and northern Alaska.


Same play, different actors :wink:

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2006, 13:59
deowl wrote:
I wonder why this question looks so familiar to me...
Take a look at Q224 from OG10 :lol:

Inuits of the Bering Sea were in isolation from contact with Europeans longer than Aleuts or Inuits of the North Pacific and northern Alaska.


Same play, different actors :wink:


saw the explanation... stupid idioms again :x

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 351

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2006, 21:16
OA is D.

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2006, 21:22
Will go with D.

isolated is better than in isolation
Also were is required to make the correct comaprison between the two periods of isolation not between period of isolation and a species.

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 69

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Location: Seoul
Re: SC : Woodland [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2006, 21:49
zoom612 wrote:
The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with humans longer than either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species.

A. in isolation from contact with humans longer than
B. isolated from contact with humans longer than
C. in isolation from contact with humans longer than were
D. isolated from contact with humans longer than were
E. in isolation and without contacts with humans longer than



Go with C

After 'than' we need verb. Otherwise it will be confusing.
And 'in isolation' looks better that 'isolated', because 'be in isolation' is a status while 'be isolated' is an action that cannot last.

--------------

After writing this, i knew OA is D
Then what about the old example. Inuits something ?
Which on should I choose?
_________________

You go, we go

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 153

Kudos [?]: 68 [1], given: 0

Schools: Kellogg(A), Wharton(W), Columbia(D)
Re: SC : Woodland [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2008, 06:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
I am not sure why the "were" at the end of the phrase is necessary here. can someone pls help with this?

Kudos [?]: 68 [1], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1434

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 0

Re: SC : Woodland [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2008, 07:08
anirudhoswal wrote:
I am not sure why the "were" at the end of the phrase is necessary here. can someone pls help with this?


I got D, so I will explain...

Here is D
The woodland sub-species were isolated from contact with humans longer than were either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species.

Without "were", the sentence is saying "humans" are "longer than marsh cousins"
With "were", the sentence is much clearer...

Remember that you can place "were" at the beginning or at the end. The sentence below, which has the same meaning, is correct as well...
The woodland sub-species were isolated from contact with humans longer than either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species was.

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1434

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 0

Re: SC : Woodland [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2008, 07:25
saravalli wrote:
bkk145 wrote:
anirudhoswal wrote:
I am not sure why the "were" at the end of the phrase is necessary here. can someone pls help with this?


I got D, so I will explain...

Here is D
The woodland sub-species were isolated from contact with humans longer than were either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species.

Without "were", the sentence is saying "humans" are "longer than marsh cousins"
With "were", the sentence is much clearer...

Remember that you can place "were" at the beginning or at the end. The sentence below, which has the same meaning, is correct as well...
The woodland sub-species were isolated from contact with humans longer than either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species was.

Is it 'were' or 'was'?
I think 'were'.


you are right, it is "were"
Too early for me...

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 71

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Re: SC : Woodland [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2008, 08:54
D---pretty straightforward...

thanks!!

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 153

Kudos [?]: 68 [1], given: 0

Schools: Kellogg(A), Wharton(W), Columbia(D)
Re: SC : Woodland [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2008, 05:41
1
This post received
KUDOS
Thanks guys. I agree its clearer like that.

Kudos [?]: 68 [1], given: 0

Re: SC : Woodland   [#permalink] 15 May 2008, 05:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.