It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 10:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 351

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2006, 06:42
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with humans longer than either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species.

A. in isolation from contact with humans longer than
B. isolated from contact with humans longer than
C. in isolation from contact with humans longer than were
D. isolated from contact with humans longer than were
E. in isolation and without contacts with humans longer than

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 153

Kudos [?]: 68 [1], given: 0

Schools: Kellogg(A), Wharton(W), Columbia(D)

### Show Tags

07 May 2008, 06:19
1
KUDOS
I am not sure why the "were" at the end of the phrase is necessary here. can someone pls help with this?

Kudos [?]: 68 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 153

Kudos [?]: 68 [1], given: 0

Schools: Kellogg(A), Wharton(W), Columbia(D)

### Show Tags

15 May 2008, 05:41
1
KUDOS
Thanks guys. I agree its clearer like that.

Kudos [?]: 68 [1], given: 0

Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 788

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

Location: BULGARIA

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2006, 07:00
In order, to have correct comparison we need " longer than WERE"
Narrowing down to C and D. Since there is no subject in the sentence if we use "were isolated" construction then it is not clear who or what isolated the species. Think that C eliminates this flaw.
IMO C

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 258

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2006, 09:13
D for me too.

isolated from is the correct usage.

without "were" the meaning is not clear -

X were in contact with Y longer than Z

is this comparing between X - Y v/s Y-Z or X-Y v/s Z-Y ?

X were in contact with Y longer than were Z

this is clearly comparing X-Y v/s Z-Y

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2006, 09:26
it is b/w C and D due to "were" for ||sm

now... "in isolation from" vs. "isolated from" IMO both are correct usage, but they mean different things:

"in isolation from" means that nobody isolated them whereas "isolated from" implies the action that someone "isolated them from humans"...

and since the original says that there was no such action I choose C, because D changes the meaning

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 444

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2006, 12:11
I wonder why this question looks so familiar to me...
Take a look at Q224 from OG10

Inuits of the Bering Sea were in isolation from contact with Europeans longer than Aleuts or Inuits of the North Pacific and northern Alaska.

Same play, different actors

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2006, 13:59
deowl wrote:
I wonder why this question looks so familiar to me...
Take a look at Q224 from OG10

Inuits of the Bering Sea were in isolation from contact with Europeans longer than Aleuts or Inuits of the North Pacific and northern Alaska.

Same play, different actors

saw the explanation... stupid idioms again

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 351

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2006, 21:16
OA is D.

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2006, 21:22
Will go with D.

isolated is better than in isolation
Also were is required to make the correct comaprison between the two periods of isolation not between period of isolation and a species.

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 69

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Location: Seoul

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2006, 21:49
zoom612 wrote:
The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with humans longer than either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species.

A. in isolation from contact with humans longer than
B. isolated from contact with humans longer than
C. in isolation from contact with humans longer than were
D. isolated from contact with humans longer than were
E. in isolation and without contacts with humans longer than

Go with C

After 'than' we need verb. Otherwise it will be confusing.
And 'in isolation' looks better that 'isolated', because 'be in isolation' is a status while 'be isolated' is an action that cannot last.

--------------

After writing this, i knew OA is D
Then what about the old example. Inuits something ?
Which on should I choose?
_________________

You go, we go

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1434

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 May 2008, 07:08
anirudhoswal wrote:
I am not sure why the "were" at the end of the phrase is necessary here. can someone pls help with this?

I got D, so I will explain...

Here is D
The woodland sub-species were isolated from contact with humans longer than were either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species.

Without "were", the sentence is saying "humans" are "longer than marsh cousins"
With "were", the sentence is much clearer...

Remember that you can place "were" at the beginning or at the end. The sentence below, which has the same meaning, is correct as well...
The woodland sub-species were isolated from contact with humans longer than either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species was.

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1434

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 May 2008, 07:25
saravalli wrote:
bkk145 wrote:
anirudhoswal wrote:
I am not sure why the "were" at the end of the phrase is necessary here. can someone pls help with this?

I got D, so I will explain...

Here is D
The woodland sub-species were isolated from contact with humans longer than were either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species.

Without "were", the sentence is saying "humans" are "longer than marsh cousins"
With "were", the sentence is much clearer...

Remember that you can place "were" at the beginning or at the end. The sentence below, which has the same meaning, is correct as well...
The woodland sub-species were isolated from contact with humans longer than either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species was.

Is it 'were' or 'was'?
I think 'were'.

you are right, it is "were"
Too early for me...

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 71

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 May 2008, 08:54
D---pretty straightforward...

thanks!!

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Re: SC : Woodland   [#permalink] 07 May 2008, 08:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.