It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 19:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 139

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2005, 13:46
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike unless the management increases their wages. As Bell's president is well aware, however, in order to increase the workers' wages, Bell would have to sell off some of its subsidiaries. So, some of Bell's subsidiaries will be sold.

The conclusion above is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?

a) Bell Manufacturing will begin to suffer increased losses
b) Bell's management will refuse to increase its workers' wages
c) The workers at Bell Manufacturing will not be going on strike
d) Bell's president has the authority to offer the workers their desired wage increase
e) Bell's workers will not accept a package of improved benefits in place of their desired wage increase

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1705

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Series..#11 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2005, 21:55
c) The workers at Bell Manufacturing will not be going on strike

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 666

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2005, 06:57
Why is D wrong here?

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 716

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2005, 14:51
C and D are only relevent.

conclusion is - some of Bell's subsidiaries will be sold. Meaning pay increase will happen.

C says, workers wont go on strike. This has to be true. So is the assumption. If you negate this, then conclusion does not stand. meaning subsidries will not be sold.

Hence C

D, good information but has nothing to do with the argument.

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 555

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Series..#11 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2005, 07:57
cybera wrote:
The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike unless the management increases their wages. As Bell's president is well aware, however, in order to increase the workers' wages, Bell would have to sell off some of its subsidiaries. So, some of Bell's subsidiaries will be sold.

The conclusion above is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?

a) Bell Manufacturing will begin to suffer increased losses
b) Bell's management will refuse to increase its workers' wages
c) The workers at Bell Manufacturing will not be going on strike
d) Bell's president has the authority to offer the workers their desired wage increase
e) Bell's workers will not accept a package of improved benefits in place of their desired wage increase


I'm choosing (E) on this one. If Bell's workers will accept a package of improved benefits as substitute, then Bell's subsidiaries may not be sold eventually (the conclusion). On the other hand if the workers does not, then YES, bell has to sell some of it's subsidiaries to raise money to pay workers.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 139

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2005, 10:39
"C" is correct

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 555

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2005, 23:58
guys, this is embarassing! :oops:
how could (C) be an assumption? could someone please explain a little more?

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Location: Ghana
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2005, 10:46
Someway somehow i also think E is the answer.
_________________

It's not over until it's OVER!

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 349

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 1

Location: USA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jul 2005, 11:35
Arsene_Wenger wrote:
guys, this is embarassing! :oops:
how could (C) be an assumption? could someone please explain a little more?


Hey Arsene, You don't have to be embarassed asking this question. To answer the question, identify the conclusion - which is, So, some of Bell's subsidiaries will be sold. The premise states that "in order to increase the workers' wages, Bell would have to sell off some of its subsidiaries".

Ok!! Negate the choices, and see, which choice weakens the assumptions the most.

If C is negated. We get "The workers at Bell Manufacturing will be going on strike". If that were to be true, it means that the worker's demands were not met, and in other words, Bell did not sell of some of its subsidiaries to raise money. Hence C

Please note that D just states a fact, and even if it is a fact that Bell's President did not have the authority to meet the worker's salary demands, the choice does not account for the fact that some of Bell's subsidiaries were sold.

Hope my explanation helps!!

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 1

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 555

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2005, 12:46
thanks Darth. I have discovered my error. I continued to misread the question as a strenghten the conclusion question!!!! that's my weakest link - Errors!!!! :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 555

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2005, 12:48
kwasi7 wrote:
Someway somehow i also think E is the answer.


Kwasi, if you read it well, (E) actually tends to strenghten the conclusion that the folks will sell their subsidiaries!

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 543

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

Location: Canuckland
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2005, 13:45
C. the only one that makes sense here/possible

if some subidiarieas aren't sold then workers go on strike
if workers don't go on srtrike then some subsidiaries are sold.

however thechnically assumption in C isn't necessary

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 716

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2005, 18:29
C is the one

Conclusion - Units will be SOLD
Evidence - workers will be on strike if management does not increase the salary.
Evidance - Managment has no extra money to fulfill the demands.

Now we need another part that will will make conclusion valid.

a) Bell Manufacturing will begin to suffer increased losses
- OUT How, they are selling their subsidaries.
b) Bell's management will refuse to increase its workers' wages
- They will go on strike and no need to sell the subs.. so OUT
c) The workers at Bell Manufacturing will not be going on strike
- Good, that's why subs are being sold...
d) Bell's president has the authority to offer the workers their desired wage increase
- OUT He does not have the authority, so what.. we need to increase the salary and there is no other way in the argument...
e) Bell's workers will not accept a package of improved benefits in place of their desired wage increase
- WHo knows. if they do, how come subs are being sold.

And moreover, negate C, the argument falls apart...

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Location: Ghana
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2005, 04:37
Arsene_Wenger wrote:
kwasi7 wrote:
Someway somehow i also think E is the answer.


Kwasi, if you read it well, (E) actually tends to strenghten the conclusion that the folks will sell their subsidiaries!


Thanks man, i really was looking at the question in the wrong way.
_________________

It's not over until it's OVER!

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 26 Jul 2005, 04:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.