Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 23 Mar 2017, 03:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3460
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 871 [0], given: 781

The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2003, 11:14
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:39) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

23. The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike unless the management increases their wages. As Bell's president is well aware, however, in order to increase the worker's wages, Bell would have to sell off some of its subsidiaries. So, some of Bell's subsidiaries will be sold.

The conclusion above is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) Bell Manufacturing will begin to suffer increased losses.

(B) Bell's management will refuse to increase its worker's wages.

(C) The workers at Bell Manufacturing will not be going on strike.

(D) Bell's president has the authority to offer the workers their desired wage increase.

(E) Bell's workers will not accept a package of improved benefits in place of their desired wage increase.
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2003
Posts: 128
Location: Ukraine
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2003, 03:39
E) is tempting, but imo it is simply out of the scope.
Then I go with D)
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 252 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2003, 07:09
The argument

(1) a strike unless an increase=If not an increase, then a strike
(2) If an increase, then selling off subsidiares
(3) If X, then selling off

(1) can be rewritten: If not a strike, then an increase. Continue a chain: If an increase, then selling off. Therefore, If not strike, then selling off. X=not a strike.

I vote for C.
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3460
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 871 [0], given: 781

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2003, 09:43
stolyar wrote:
The argument

(1) a strike unless an increase=If not an increase, then a strike
(2) If an increase, then selling off subsidiares
(3) If X, then selling off

(1) can be rewritten: If not a strike, then an increase. Continue a chain: If an increase, then selling off. Therefore, If not strike, then selling off. X=not a strike.

I vote for C.

Stolyar

Initially, when i checked the key,i couldnt believe that C is the answer.
But i guess i didnt know formal logic.

Stolyar, can you give us an idea about how to use formal logic in CR's

Thanks
Praetorian
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 252 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2003, 11:00
Sometimes I post my own formal logic quizes—you can find them in the verbal forum. Likewise, there are logic guides that are available here at this site.
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2003
Posts: 128
Location: Ukraine
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2003, 11:03
The guide posted by akamai is not displayed correctly and PDF link does not work either.
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 252 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2003, 11:10
then contact Mr. BB, he is a webmaster.
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2003
Posts: 128
Location: Ukraine
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2003, 11:11
I sure will. He just came back from Hong Kong.
Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2003
Posts: 72
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Bell Manufacturing ,#2 -23 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Oct 2003, 17:20
not increase => strike
increase => sell off

So
not strike => increase => sell off
From this, we can ONLY conclude that NOT sell off => NOT increase => NOT not trike = strike

We cannot conclude that Sell off => increase => not strike

So C is not assumption! Intuitively, you may sell off but use the money for other purpose and therefore strike still happend. So one of the assumption here is that Money only used for increasing salary.

1 more point because sell off hasn't happend (and by no mean that you know it will happend), IF we assume that no strike SO why we have to sell off something!!!
I believe that the book may choose C as assumption BUT in gmat test, it will not make this mistake

Any idea
_________________

I have 2 month for gmat.

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10664
Followers: 956

Kudos [?]: 213 [0], given: 0

Re: The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2014, 04:00
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike   [#permalink] 13 Jul 2014, 04:00
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike 35 28 May 2010, 06:59
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers 6 27 Aug 2009, 09:52
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers 7 24 Jul 2008, 12:03
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers 3 25 Feb 2008, 16:29
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers 0 10 Jul 2008, 13:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by