It is currently 17 Dec 2017, 00:06

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

There are far fewer children available for adoption than

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Its Wow or Never
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 203

Kudos [?]: 314 [1], given: 7

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2010, 13:01
1
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (01:15) correct 42% (01:26) wrong based on 445 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who
want to adopt. Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982,
the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.

Which of the following statements, if true, most strengthens the author’s claim
that there are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who
want to adopt?

(A) The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly in the last
decade.
(B) The number of adoptions in the current year is greater than the number of
adoptions in any preceding year.
(C) The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of
children available for adoption in that period.
(D) People who seek to adopt children often go through a long process of
interviews and investigation by adoption agencies.
(E) People who seek to adopt children generally make very good parents.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think you can,you can
If you think you can't,you are right.


Last edited by mojorising800 on 02 Feb 2010, 07:07, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 314 [1], given: 7

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 356

Kudos [?]: 430 [0], given: 47

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2010, 13:16
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who
want to adopt. Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982,
the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.
Which of the following statements, if true, most strengthens the author’s claim
that there are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who
want to adopt?
(A) The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly in the last
decade.
(B) The number of adoptions in the current year is greater than the number of
adoptions in any preceding year.
(C) The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of
children available for adoption in that period.
(D) People who seek to adopt children often go through a long process of
interviews and investigation by adoption agencies.
(E) People who seek to adopt children generally make very good parents.

Would go with C....

C strengths the no of adoption with the available children..... this gives the statement in the stem - "but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions." clear significance that no of children are few....!
_________________

Cheers!
JT...........
If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!! :beer

|Do not post questions with OA|Please underline your SC questions while posting|Try posting the explanation along with your answer choice|
|For CR refer Powerscore CR Bible|For SC refer Manhattan SC Guide|


~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~

Kudos [?]: 430 [0], given: 47

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2010
Posts: 377

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 3439

Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Feb 2010, 09:31
Yep, I agree with jeeteshsingh. C unambiguously strengthens the argument by pegging the number of children available for adoption to a concrete number, which is far less than the concrete number of parents looking to adopt.

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 3439

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2009
Posts: 123

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 15

Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V37
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2010, 01:48
I would go with C as well.
What is the debatable OA?

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 15

Retired Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Posts: 147

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 53

Concentration: Strategy, Other
WE: Business Development (Consulting)
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2010, 03:08
C. Whats is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 53

4 KUDOS received
Tuck Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 305

Kudos [?]: 168 [4], given: 69

Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools: Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2010, 03:44
4
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
This argument is yet another example of "shift of the scope" trick that GMAC so loves to pull out.

Premise
Quote:
Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.

That's simply a statement of fact. The number of people who want to adopt is compared with the number of adoptions

Conclusion
Quote:
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt.

In this conclusion number of people who want to adopt is compared with children available for adoption. This comparison is quite different from that in the premise. If we want to show validity of the conclusion - we somehow should establish following connection:

Number of adoptions == Number of children available for adoption

Answ (C) does exactly the same

Kudos [?]: 168 [4], given: 69

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 236

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2010, 05:13
yep C.

The argument --far fewer children for adpation--is based on the fact that there are millions waiting to adapt but only 50,000 adpated in a year. The assumption must be that 50000 children were the only the available ones for adpation.
C confirms that assumption.
D and E are out of scope.
A does not generate any discussion.
B is tricky. It could be the answer if we knew how many people were waiting to adopt in the previous years.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Joined: 31 Dec 1969

Kudos [?]: [0], given:

Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 3: 740 Q40 V50
GMAT 4: 700 Q48 V38
GMAT 5: 710 Q45 V41
GMAT 6: 680 Q47 V36
GMAT 9: 740 Q49 V42
GMAT 11: 500 Q47 V33
GMAT 14: 760 Q49 V44
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2010, 21:54
shalva wrote:
This argument is yet another example of "shift of the scope" trick that GMAC so loves to pull out.

Premise
Quote:
Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.

That's simply a statement of fact. The number of people who want to adopt is compared with the number of adoptions

Conclusion
Quote:
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt.

In this conclusion number of people who want to adopt is compared with children available for adoption. This comparison is quite different from that in the premise. If we want to show validity of the conclusion - we somehow should establish following connection:

Number of adoptions == Number of children available for adoption

Answ (C) does exactly the same


Good explanation. No wonder you got a 47 on verbal. kudos to you.

Premise is just a fact here. I see the trick. Premise is trying to distract you. If C is not true then the conclusion falls apart.

Kudos [?]: [0], given:

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 151

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 15

Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2010, 17:05
shalva wrote:
Number of adoptions == Number of children available for adoption


Almost missed that when reading the answers. Thanks

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 15

Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 485

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 149

WE 1: 4 years Tech
There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2010, 01:45
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt. Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.
Which of the following statements, if true, most strengthens the author’s claim that there are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt?
(A) The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly in the last decade.
(B) The number of adoptions in the current year is greater than the number of adoptions in any preceding year.
(C) The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period.
(D) People who seek to adopt children often go through a long process of interviews and investigation by adoption agencies.
(E) People who seek to adopt children generally make very good parents.
This posts invites Discussions not answers
Sorce:Mister Eko
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 149

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: swimming against the current
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 238

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 30

Location: Chennai, India
Re: Not many children [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2010, 06:24
Conclusion: less children available but many people are ready to adopt.
Premise: 2 million people are looking out for children and there were only 50,000 adoptions - This could be due there is a lack of children left to be adopted as the author says or there could be some other reasons. We are required to prove that there are no other options but fewer children available.

mundasingh123 wrote:
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt. Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.
Which of the following statements, if true, most strengthens the author’s claim that there are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt?
(A) The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly in the last decade. Doesn't matter - Out of scope
(B) The number of adoptions in the current year is greater than the number of adoptions in any preceding year.Doesn't matter - Out of scope
(C) The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period. This says no children are left to be adopted, which means there are fewer children . Demand exceeds Supply :lol:
(D) People who seek to adopt children often go through a long process of interviews and investigation by adoption agencies. - This says that there is another reason for less adoption, which means there are children but the policies makes it difficult - hence weakens
(E) People who seek to adopt children generally make very good parents. - I dont care
This posts invites Discussions not answers - ROGER THAT :-D
Sorce:Mister Eko

_________________

Gonna make it this time

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 30

Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 485

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 149

WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: Not many children [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2010, 06:58
mailnavin1 wrote:
Conclusion: less children available but many people are ready to adopt.
Premise: 2 million people are looking out for children and there were only 50,000 adoptions - This could be due there is a lack of children left to be adopted as the author says or there could be some other reasons. We are required to prove that there are no other options but fewer children available.

mundasingh123 wrote:
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt. Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.
Which of the following statements, if true, most strengthens the author’s claim that there are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt?
(A) The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly in the last decade. Doesn't matter - Out of scope
(B) The number of adoptions in the current year is greater than the number of adoptions in any preceding year.Doesn't matter - Out of scope
(C) The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period. This says no children are left to be adopted, which means there are fewer children . Demand exceeds Supply :lol:
(D) People who seek to adopt children often go through a long process of interviews and investigation by adoption agencies. - This says that there is another reason for less adoption, which means there are children but the policies makes it difficult - hence weakens
(E) People who seek to adopt children generally make very good parents. - I dont care
This posts invites Discussions not answers - ROGER THAT :-D
Sorce:Mister Eko

i tnink u have misread the stimulus . Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 149

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 7

Re: Not many children [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2010, 10:32
I still think C would be vaild even though the figure of 50K is from 1982. The fact is this proves that the suuply is short just because there is less children up for adoption rather than some other reason -strengthens argument by alleviating assunption.

Thanks.

Posted from my mobile device

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 7

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1626

Kudos [?]: 1141 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: Not many children [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2010, 12:41
+1 C
Roger that 8-)
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1141 [0], given: 109

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Bring the Rain
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 389

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 46

Location: United States (MD)
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.13
WE: Corporate Finance (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: Not many children [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2010, 18:02
I'd go with C
_________________

Go Blue!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 46

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 94

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 25

Reviews Badge
Re: Not many children [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Dec 2010, 02:06
Its between A & C
but A doesnot tell anything about increase of decrease of the children.

Not fully convience with C , but in between A nd C , C is better..
_________________

Kudos if any of my post helps you !!!

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 25

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 418

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 70

Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2011, 00:06
I am finding some problems to buy the explanations given earlier. As the question states, we need to find the statement to strengthen the claim "far fewer children available".

Where option C can support the claim as "fewer children available", it does not support the claim "far fewer" from any angle. I can easily interpret that demand is equal or marginally more than the supply.

Option A states "The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly". In case the statement used the word "wishing" or "wanting" or something similar instead of "waiting", this option could have been ignored. But, when the number of couples, who are waiting, is increasing significantly, definitely demand is equal or more than supply. I don't believe couples would wait should there be necessary supply.

I do not see any reason which can clearly make option C standout over option A. I will appreciate any proper explanation to support C over A.

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 70

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 516

Kudos [?]: 312 [0], given: 16

Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2011, 01:17
doe007 wrote:
I am finding some problems to buy the explanations given earlier. As the question states, we need to find the statement to strengthen the claim "far fewer children available".

Where option C can support the claim as "fewer children available", it does not support the claim "far fewer" from any angle. I can easily interpret that demand is equal or marginally more than the supply.

Option A states "The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly". In case the statement used the word "wishing" or "wanting" or something similar instead of "waiting", this option could have been ignored. But, when the number of couples, who are waiting, is increasing significantly, definitely demand is equal or more than supply. I don't believe couples would wait should there be necessary supply.

I do not see any reason which can clearly make option C standout over option A. I will appreciate any proper explanation to support C over A.




A speaks about last decade, i think here we are talking about present decade and that's why i chose C, but A is a good contender, please correct me if i am wrong
_________________

+1 Kudos If found helpful..

Kudos [?]: 312 [0], given: 16

BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 889

Kudos [?]: 745 [0], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2011, 07:14
2 million couple waiting for adoption, but in 1982 only some 50,000 adoptions. The preceding premise stated that the children need adopting are fewer than the people want to adopt. So, this is clear that the 50.000 adoption is inferred that The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period.

Choice C is correct one.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 745 [0], given: 44

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 418

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 70

Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2011, 07:55
kotela wrote:
doe007 wrote:
I am finding some problems to buy the explanations given earlier. As the question states, we need to find the statement to strengthen the claim "far fewer children available".

Where option C can support the claim as "fewer children available", it does not support the claim "far fewer" from any angle. I can easily interpret that demand is equal or marginally more than the supply.

Option A states "The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly". In case the statement used the word "wishing" or "wanting" or something similar instead of "waiting", this option could have been ignored. But, when the number of couples, who are waiting, is increasing significantly, definitely demand is equal or more than supply. I don't believe couples would wait should there be necessary supply.

I do not see any reason which can clearly make option C standout over option A. I will appreciate any proper explanation to support C over A.




A speaks about last decade, i think here we are talking about present decade and that's why i chose C, but A is a good contender, please correct me if i am wrong


"Last decade" might be reason for discarding option A.

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 70

Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than   [#permalink] 18 Dec 2011, 07:55

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 36 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

There are far fewer children available for adoption than

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.