Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 May 2017, 14:03

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2022
Followers: 2211

Kudos [?]: 7739 [0], given: 291

Re: There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2014, 13:21
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
kinjiGC wrote:
Just to summarize the understanding, "it" should refer to the "complete" subject along with the modifier.

Can I use "that"? Can you please clarify the difference.

Hi kinjiGC,

Any pronoun used to refer to a noun will include the associated modifier with it. It just cannot pick up the "noun" and leave alone the modifier. This is applicable for the use of "that" as well.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
SJ
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Posts: 244
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 13

Re: There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2015, 12:52
Fistail wrote:
There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our heavy reliance on fossil fuels: more than ten times as much energy is generated through wind power now than it was in 1990

A) generated through wind power now than it was
B) generated through wind power now as it was
C) generated through wind power now as was the case
D) now generated through wind power as it was
E) now generated through wind power than was the case

mikemcgarry

could you please clarify what is the issue with option B and D.

Please clarify this. i think it is referring to energy then why these options are wrong.

Thanks
Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2015
Posts: 121
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 260

Re: There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2015, 03:35
Fistail wrote:
There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our heavy reliance on fossil fuels: more than ten times as much energy is generated through wind power now than it was in 1990

A) generated through wind power now than it was
B) generated through wind power now as it was
C) generated through wind power now as was the case
D) now generated through wind power as it was
E) now generated through wind power than was the case

A very nice question:

Split 1) In structure 'times as ... ' we need as to conclude the comparison: Eliminate A, E

Split 2) 'it' in B and D refers to 'energy' that is generated through wind power now. When a pronoun refers to a noun it exactly means the same thing. But this cannot be true, as now ten time the 1990 amount of energy is generated through wind power. Eliminate B, D

Split 3) 'now' before 'generated' (as in D) or after 'power' as in B: this split is not decisive as both are okay here
Intern
Joined: 10 Jun 2015
Posts: 23
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 490 Q47 V13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 9

Re: There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2016, 22:25
This is 700 + level question. Hence, there must be some twist / new rule coming into picture. Coming to question:
A and E are out because we need as not than.
D is out because of wrong placement of now.
Down to B/C
I choose B over C as it was concise and looks clear.

After having a look at OA, if i were to justify my self,than i would have given following reasoning

In parallelism question. always see what is being compared first. Here the energy generated now is being compared with energy generated in 1910.
Option B is comparing energy generated now vs (energy) in 1910 (it refers to energy)
Option C compares energy generated now vs (was the case in 1910) - a fact

C looks to compare correctly. Hence OA - C
_________________

Abhilash
Learn, Apply, Fail, Analyse, and Practice.

Consider +1 Kudos if you find my post helpful.

Intern
Joined: 09 Jul 2016
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2016, 21:42
It's C; think about it, when there is a multiple, xx times, only say as much as...not as much than. Additionally, you are not comparing the amount of wind power generated, but rather the event of generating wind power. so cannot use "it" as pronoun. Only C left
Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 75
Schools: Tuck '19
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 112

Re: There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2016, 05:51
daagh wrote:
The real comparison is between the energy produced now and the energy produced in 1990. The expression - ten times as much energy as -is the term used to describe the quantum of energy.

A) more than ten times as much energy is generated through wind power now than it was
B) more than ten times as much energy is generated through wind power now as it was
C) more than ten times as much energy is generated through wind power now as was the case
D) more than ten times as much energy is now generated through wind power as it was
E) more than ten times as much energy is now generated through wind power than was the case

You may see that A and E, use a wrong idiom namely 'as much energy than' and hence can be safely dropped. Among BCD, B and D lose steam because of using the pronoun"it' without a clear referent.

C is therefore the right royal choice.

PS: This post has been edited by me reflecting the points noted by another poster.

Sir why can't 'it' refer to 'energy'?
Intern
Joined: 02 Nov 2015
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2016, 02:52
hi egmat

Can you explain why it is referring to 10 times the energy ?? Can we use that in place of it .

Thanks
Neha
Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3041
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Followers: 512

Kudos [?]: 2257 [0], given: 22

There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2016, 08:38
NehaManpreet1625 wrote:
hi egmat

Can you explain why it is referring to 10 times the energy ?? Can we use that in place of it .

Thanks
Neha

"It" does not refer to "ten times the energy" - a pronoun cannot refer to a group of words such as this one - a pronoun has to refer to a noun (or a noun phrase).

The point is that the pronoun "it" does not have any antecedent (nouns such "energy" or "wind power" are not suitable antecedents for the pronoun in this sentence). The proper antecedent of "it" could be the word "case", but this word is not there in the sentence. Hence all options that have "it" are wrong.

No, "that" is equally wrong - "that" as a demonstrative pronoun must have a noun to follow or as a relative pronoun must have a noun to refer to:

That pen is mine (demonstrative - the noun "pen" follows)
The car you have is bigger than that I have (relative - referring to "car").

However the following sentence is wrong:
There were many exciting games in the party: that was great.
(wrong - "that" cannot refer to the whole fact that "There were many exciting games in the party")
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 204
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 470 Q30 V20
GMAT 2: 620 Q42 V33
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 138

There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2016, 13:22
I don't know, I see a problem beyond the ones related above.

Quote:
as much energy is generated

Quote:
as it was ????? in 1990

"it" relates clearly to energy, BUT...

Quote:
as it was ????? in 1990

SO, replacing "it" by [the energy generated]..

Quote:
as [the energy generated] was in 1990

the point is that energy can't "be" anything, so we can eliminate B and D

now...

Quote:
as was the energy generated in 1990
There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our   [#permalink] 20 Sep 2016, 13:22

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 29 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our 4 14 Oct 2014, 23:52
3 There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our 3 05 Apr 2015, 23:39
1 There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our 4 24 Oct 2014, 06:49
1 There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our 4 16 Nov 2014, 12:42
12 There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our 21 19 Sep 2015, 03:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by