Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 May 2017, 00:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# There are more opera houses than there were two decades ago,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 27
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

There are more opera houses than there were two decades ago, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2010, 22:35
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

14% (03:42) correct 86% (01:17) wrong based on 29 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

There are more opera houses than there were two decades ago, and charitable contributions are on the rise. Average audiences for opera, however, have been declining for the past twenty years.

Which of the following. if true, best explains the discrepancy above?
A. In the past twenty years musical theater audiences have grown.
B. A change in the tax code has conferred certain advantages on charitable giving.
C. Constructions codes have been revised on a national level to promote the construction of cultural facilities.
D. there has been an emphasis on unamplified sound in opera.
E. The number of new works has declined in the past three decades.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by suhi on 27 Oct 2010, 00:59, edited 1 time in total.
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 173
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 25

Re: opera house [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2010, 23:03
B.

B. A change in the tax code has conferred certain advantages on charitable giving.
Hence there are more people (who are not necessarily interested in opera) making charitable contributions because of the tax advantages.
_________________

Give [highlight]KUDOS [/highlight] if you like my post.

Always do things which make you feel ALIVE!!!

Intern
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 27
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: opera house [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2010, 23:29
Even i thought its B. surprisingly the OA isnt B. plz gimme more feedback. because cant get any idea how that ans can be the OA.
Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 185
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 5

Re: opera house [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2010, 03:29
IMO E.

P1: No. of Opera Houses have increased
P2: Average audiences for Opera have decreased.

The only way to explain this discrepancy is, if we consider that the No. of new Operas are decreasing. Hence let us say that:
Audience in 1990: 100
Audience in 2010: 1000

No. of new Operas in 1990: 50 ... hence the dedicated audience of 100 goes to each of the 50 Operas making the Total audience for that year as 5000
No. of new Operas in 2010: 4 … hence dedicated audience of 1000 goes to each of the 4 Operas making the Total audience for that year as 4000.

Thus the audience are declining as can be seen from the figures.
_________________

Please give me kudos, if you like the above post.
Thanks.

Intern
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 27
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: opera house [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2010, 00:58
OA is D...its from Princeton review

gosh...how one can think of such an ans....if someone understands plz help
Manager
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 91
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: opera house [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2010, 01:08
devashish wrote:
IMO E.

P1: No. of Opera Houses have increased
P2: Average audiences for Opera have decreased.

The only way to explain this discrepancy is, if we consider that the No. of new Operas are decreasing. Hence let us say that:
Audience in 1990: 100
Audience in 2010: 1000

No. of new Operas in 1990: 50 ... hence the dedicated audience of 100 goes to each of the 50 Operas making the Total audience for that year as 5000
No. of new Operas in 2010: 4 … hence dedicated audience of 1000 goes to each of the 4 Operas making the Total audience for that year as 4000.

Thus the audience are declining as can be seen from the figures.

well, i chose B and i even dont understand what D means...why its D?
Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 315
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 35

Re: opera house [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2010, 06:04
A. In the past twenty years musical theater audiences have grown - "musical theater audiences growing cannot impact audiences in opera"
B. A change in the tax code has conferred certain advantages on charitable giving - out of scope but keep it.
C. Constructions codes have been revised on a national level to promote the construction of cultural facilities. - irrelevant to the QS.
D. there has been an emphasis on unamplified sound in opera - irrelevant
E. The number of new works has declined in the past three decades - the # of new opera works could have declined OR new works somewhere else could have declined. This is very attractive, but stretch to assume

But IMO it is B
Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 315
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 35

Re: opera house [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2010, 06:15
maybe something is missing in the question stem. It is totally out of scope. The least we can assume is "the sound quality was bad that it decreased audiences to opera, but how can that start contributing to chairty????"

any experts pls could you help solve this?
Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2011
Posts: 26
Location: Bulgaria
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 13

There are more opera houses than there were two decades ago, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2015, 11:43
Nothing is missing from the question stem, the OP has typed everything correctly. I have the book and I was just confused by this same question. The OA really makes no sense at all. It's probably a typo in the print edition itself. Princeton Review is notorious for this kind of errors.
There are more opera houses than there were two decades ago,   [#permalink] 25 Feb 2015, 11:43
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 It seems that Americans are smarter than they were 50 years ago 3 23 May 2017, 00:10
Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design passenger 0 10 Apr 2017, 22:58
Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design 0 05 Sep 2014, 00:21
5 Politician: After a civil war two decades ago, the Laconian 12 04 Sep 2014, 23:29
31 Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design 26 13 May 2017, 03:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# There are more opera houses than there were two decades ago,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.