GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Oct 2019, 12:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 26 Oct 2014
Posts: 15
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: Stanford '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V36
GPA: 2.9
WE: Project Management (Retail Banking)
There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 13 Aug 2019, 09:13
7
39
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 2084 sessions

58% (02:59) correct 42% (03:13) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 2161 sessions

63% (01:32) correct 37% (01:38) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 2435 sessions

54% (01:16) correct 46% (01:34) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 2039 sessions

73% (01:01) correct 27% (01:10) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 2030 sessions

75% (00:55) correct 25% (01:03) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 6
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 1933 sessions

66% (01:16) correct 34% (01:31) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian populations and of extinctions of a number of the world's endangered amphibian species. These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this "amphibian crisis", which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.

To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored. A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one. An endangered population is always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of extinction even without a proximate cause in human activities. Its disappearance, however unfortunate, should come as no great surprise. Moreover, chance events—which may indicate nothing about the direction of trends in population size—may lead to its extinction. The probability of extinction due to such random factors depends on the population size and is independent of the prevailing direction of change in that size.

For biologists, population declines are potentially more worrisome than extinctions. Persistent declines, especially in large populations, indicate a changed ecological context. Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population). Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.

It is Indisputably true that there is simply not enough long-term scientific data on amphibian populations to enable researches to identify real declines in amphibian populations. Many fairly common amphibian species declared all but extinct after severe declines in the 1950s and 1960s have subsequently recovered, and so might the apparently declining populations that have generated the current appearance of an amphibian crisis. Unfortunately, long-term data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.


1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) assess the validity of a certain view
(B) distinguish between two phenomena
(C) identify the causes of a problem
(D) describe a disturbing trend
(E) allay concern about a particular phenomenon



2. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the environmentalists mentioned in lines 5-6?

(A) They have wrongly chosen to focus on anecdotal reports rather than on the long-term data that are currently available concerning amphibians.
(B) Their recommendations are flawed because their research focuses too narrowly on a single category of animal species.
(C) Their certainty that population declines in general are caused by environmental degradation is not warranted.
(D) They have drawn premature conclusions concerning a crisis in amphibian populations from recent reports of declines.
(E) They have overestimated the effects of chance events on trends in amphibian populations.



3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the amphibian extinctions that have recently been reported?

(A) They have resulted primarily from human activities causing environmental degradation.
(B)They could probably have been prevented if timely action had been taken to protect the habitats of amphibian species.
(C) They should not come as a surprise, because amphibian populations generally have been declining for a number of years.
(D) They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events.
(E) They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation.



4. According to the passage, each of the following is true of endangered amphibian species EXCEPT:

(A) They are among the rarest kinds of amphibians.
(B) They generally have populations that are small in size.
(C) They are in constant danger of extinction.
(D) Those with decreasing populations are the most likely candidates for immediate extinction.
(E) The are in danger of extinction due to events that sometimes have nothing to do with human activities.



5. Which of the following most accurately describes the organization of the passage?

(A) A question is raised, a distinction regarding it is made, and the question is answered.
(B) An interpretation is presented, its soundness is examined, and a warning is given.
(C) A situation is described, its consequences are analyzed, and a prediction is made.
(D) Two interpretations of a phenomenon are described, and one of them is rejected as invalid.
(E) Two methods for analyzing a phenomenon are compared, and further study of the phenomenon is recommended.



6. Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38 [Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.]?

(A) To give an example of a particular kind of study
(B) To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
(D) To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
(E) To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph



RC0029-01
RC0029-02
RC0029-03
RC0029-04
RC0029-05
RC0029-06

Originally posted by idkksh on 18 Aug 2015, 06:09.
Last edited by SajjadAhmad on 13 Aug 2019, 09:13, edited 8 times in total.
Updated - Complete topic (124).
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1348
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2017, 05:52
3
1
idkksh wrote:
Declines in amphibian populations

There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian populations and of extinctions of a number of the world's endangered amphibian species. These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this "amphibian crisis", which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.

To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored. A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one. An endangered population is always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of extinction even without a proximate cause in human activities. Its disappearance, however unfortunate, should come as no great surprise. Moreover, chance events—which may indicate nothing about the direction of trends in population size—may lead to its extinction. The probability of extinction due to such random factors depends on the population size and is independent of the prevailing direction of change in that size.

For biologists, population declines are potentially more worrisome than extinctions. Persistent declines, especially in large populations, indicate a changed ecological context. Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population). Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.

It is Indisputably true that there is simply not enough long-term scientific data on amphibian populations to enable researches to identify real declines in amphibian populations. Many fairly common amphibian species declared all but extinct after severe declines in the 1950s and 1960s have subsequently recovered, and so might the apparently declining populations that have generated the current appearance of an amphibian crisis. Unfortunately, long-term data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.
3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the amphibian extinctions that have recently been reported?

(A) They have resulted primarily from human activities causing environmental degradation.
(B)They could probably have been prevented if timely action had been taken to protect the habitats of amphibian species.
(C) They should not come as a surprise, because amphibian populations generally have been declining for a number of years.
(D) They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events.
(E) They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation.



Passage: Amphibian Populations

Question: Inference–Extinctions

The Simple Story

According to reports, certain amphibian populations are undergoing drastic decline or even extinction. Environmentalists believe that these changes are due to human activity. The passage explains how to evaluate these claims. First, it draws a distinction between a declining population and an endangered population. Then, it explains that a decline may be worse than an extinction, but may also be harmless. Finally, it concludes that there is not enough data to determine whether the amphibian population is actually declining, and whether that decline represents a crisis. However, since there is limited data, and inaction could cause serious problems, the passage argues that people should still act to protect the amphibians.

Sample Passage Map

Here is one way to map this passage. (Note: abbreviate as desired!)

P1:

- Amph declines & extinctions: bad sign?
- Env.: action needed, declines caused by humans

P2:

- Evaluate env. Claims
- Decline doesn’t = endangered

P3:

- Declines worse than extinctions
- But, some declines are okay

P4:

- Limited data
- Don’t know if amphibians are really declining?
- But: should take action now anyways

Step 1: Identify the Question

The word inferred in the question stem indicates that this is an Inference question.

Step 2: Find the Support

The entire passage deals with the amphibian extinctions, and with the author’s views on population decline and extinction. Check the answer choices to see if they provide more guidance on where to find the answer. The answer choices seem to represent general claims about the author’s beliefs, so review your passage map briefly and be prepared to find support in various places in the passage.

Step 3: Predict an Answer

It’s difficult to predict a specific answer to this question, since the author makes a number of statements about the extinctions and about extinctions in general. Focus on eliminating answer choices that don’t match the author’s claims.

Step 4: Eliminate and Find a Match

(A) This is the viewpoint of the environmentalists mentioned in the first paragraph, not of the author. The author agrees with the environmentalists that action should be taken, but does not commit to a specific viewpoint on why (or even whether) the declines occurred.

(B) The author calls for environmental action in this passage, but does not specify whether this action would involve protecting amphibian habitats.

(C) The author does state that the extinction of an endangered species is not a surprise. However, the author does not apply this statement to amphibians, and in fact, the amphibian population decline is described as recent.

(D) The author states that chance events can lead to extinction. However, the author does not speculate on whether this is true in the case of the amphibians. It most likely is not, since the author claims that chance events can lead to extinction specifically in the case of endangered species, and does not state that the amphibians were previously endangered.

(E) CORRECT. The environmentalists mentioned in the first paragraph claim that the “amphibian crisis”…is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity. However, the author states that declines can have multiple causes, and that in the case of the amphibians, there is too little data to distinguish between these causes.
_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Jul 2011
Posts: 50
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2015, 19:33
2
This is my interpretation and approach for Q

3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the amphibian extinctions that have recently been reported?

(A) They have resulted primarily from human activities causing environmental degradation.
(B)They could probably have been prevented if timely action had been taken to protect the habitats of amphibian species.
(C) They should not come as a surprise, because amphibian populations generally have been declining for a number of years.
(D) They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events.
(E) They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation.

These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this "amphibian crisis", which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity. (P1)
Explanation: The author then explains the possible causes for the decline and those causes might not lead to general and catastrophic environmental degradation.
i.e. Since the author does not agree with the environmentalists --- EXPECT ANSWER TO BE FLIPPED OF WHAT THE PASSAGE STATES
(Environmentalist believes the decline is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation.)
(ANS EXPECTED: Author DOES NOT believe the decline is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation)

6. Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38?

(A) To give an example of a particular kind of study
(B) To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
(D) To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
(E) To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph.

POE:
The BOLD STATEMENTS is a support of the preceding and the latter sentence.
P2, P3 and P4 goes against the idea that is presented in P1 that state that the decline leads to extinction.

By the way , if anyone has explanation for Q2, please post because I am stuck between C and D, and please further explain how to use the flipped method on this inference question. Thanks.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2014
Posts: 18
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Nov 2015, 02:12
2
many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this "amphibian crisis", which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.

To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored.


2. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the environmentalists mentioned in lines 5-6?

(A) They have wrongly chosen to focus on anecdotal reports rather than on the long-term data that are currently available concerning amphibians.
(B) Their recommendations are flawed because their research focuses too narrowly on a single category of animal species.
(C) Their certainty that population declines in general are caused by environmental degradation is not warranted.
(D) They have drawn premature conclusions concerning a crisis in amphibian populations from recent reports of declines.---that is why,correct
(E) They have overestimated the effects of chance events on trends in amphibian populations.
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1348
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2017, 06:08
2
idkksh wrote:
Declines in amphibian populations

There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian populations and of extinctions of a number of the world's endangered amphibian species. These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this "amphibian crisis", which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.

To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored. A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one. An endangered population is always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of extinction even without a proximate cause in human activities. Its disappearance, however unfortunate, should come as no great surprise. Moreover, chance events—which may indicate nothing about the direction of trends in population size—may lead to its extinction. The probability of extinction due to such random factors depends on the population size and is independent of the prevailing direction of change in that size.

For biologists, population declines are potentially more worrisome than extinctions. Persistent declines, especially in large populations, indicate a changed ecological context. Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population). Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.

It is Indisputably true that there is simply not enough long-term scientific data on amphibian populations to enable researches to identify real declines in amphibian populations. Many fairly common amphibian species declared all but extinct after severe declines in the 1950s and 1960s have subsequently recovered, and so might the apparently declining populations that have generated the current appearance of an amphibian crisis. Unfortunately, long-term data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.

6. Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38 [Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.]?

(A) To give an example of a particular kind of study
(B) To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
(D) To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
(E) To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph



Passage: Amphibian Populations

Question: Purpose

The Simple Story


According to reports, certain amphibian populations are undergoing drastic decline or even extinction. Environmentalists believe that these changes are due to human activity. The passage explains how to evaluate these claims. First, it draws a distinction between a declining population and an endangered population. Then, it explains that a decline may be worse than an extinction, but may also be harmless. Finally, it concludes that there is not enough data to determine whether the amphibian population is actually declining, and whether that decline represents a crisis. However, since there is limited data, and inaction could cause serious problems, the passage argues that people should still act to protect the amphibians.

Sample Passage Map

Here is one way to map this passage. (Note: abbreviate as desired!)

P1:

- Amph declines & extinctions: bad sign?
- Env.: action needed, declines caused by humans

P2:

- Evaluate env. Claims
- Decline doesn’t = endangered

P3:

- Declines worse than extinctions
- But, some declines are okay

P4:

- Limited data
- Don’t know if amphibians are really declining?
- But: should take action now anyways


Step 1: Identify the Question

The phrase function of the sentence in the question stem indicates that this is a Purpose question.

Step 2: Find the Support

Reread the sentence mentioned in the question stem and enough of the surrounding passage to provide context.

“Distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent…declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction. Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.”

The bolded sentence above is the sentence that the question stem refers to.

Step 3: Predict an Answer

The sentence describes being unable to distinguish among possibilities. The possibilities mentioned are the various possible scenarios in which a population declines. The author describes these multiple scenarios in order to express that the environmentalists’ worst-case scenario might or might not be correct: the population decline could be dangerous, but it could also be a random fluctuation. The function of this sentence is to summarize one possible reason that the environmentalists’ belief is too pessimistic.

Step 4: Eliminate and Find a Match

(A) The sentence addresses anecdotal reports, not studies.

(B) The previous sentence serves the same purpose as the sentence referenced in the question: to note that there are multiple possible scenarios under which a population could decline.

(C) CORRECT. This sentence raises an objection to the environmentalists’ view. The environmentalists believe that there is only one possible scenario in the case of the amphibians, that of a dangerous decline caused by human activity. The sentence claims that there are multiple different possible situations, only some of which are dangerous.

(D) In this sentence, the author disagrees with the environmentalists’ view by asserting that their analysis is not the only possible one.

(E) The following paragraph agrees with the sentiment of this sentence, which is that there is not enough data available to fully analyze the causes and extent of population declines.
_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Feb 2019
Posts: 2
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2019, 02:17
1
Question 2
2. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the environmentalists mentioned in lines 5-6?

(A) They have wrongly chosen to focus on anecdotal reports rather than on the long-term data that are currently available concerning amphibians.
Specifically states “there is not enough long-term scientific data” - incorrect

(B) Their recommendations are flawed because their research focuses too narrowly on a single category of animal species.
Para 3, “persistent declines, especially in large populations, indicate a changed ecological context” – so large population declines can indicate bad news – answer incorrect

(C) Their certainty that population declines in general are caused by environmental degradation is not warranted.
Watch-out words – “certainty” & “in general” – passage doesn’t indicate these environmentalists are certain (a very binary claim), or that population declines in general are caused by degradation – they are suggesting that this specific decline in amphibian population is an indicator of environmental degradation.

(D) They have drawn premature conclusions concerning a crisis in amphibian populations from recent reports of declines.
Correct – author argues in passage that their conclusions might be false & may in fact be indicative of e.g. normal fluctuations in population. He/she doesn’t fully dismiss these claims however, therefore can be inferred that he believes they are ‘premature’ – meaning conclusions have been drawn too soon without enough data.

(E) They have overestimated the effects of chance events on trends in amphibian populations.
Author states that there may be ‘random factors’ involved in this trend; this is not attributed to environmentalists
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2011
Posts: 31
Location: Kenya
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2016, 11:33
After a slight doubt in the first question (between A and E), easily cruised through this one....ADEDBC
Although, the author does try to allay some fears of the "environmentalists" pertaining to their fear of the extinction of the Amphibian species, the last paragraph confirms that the author is merely assessing the validity of a point of view.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 24 Feb 2015
Posts: 4
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2016, 14:24
Many thanks for the help! Here some additional tips:

For OG 109: The author suggests throughout the passage that recently reported amphibian
extinctions may have several different causes: they may be due to any number of
chance events, for example, or may simply be the result of a small population that
finds itself unable to continue under difficult conditions, whatever causes those
conditions.

For OG 110: This question asks what the passage does not say is true of endangered amphibian
species. The second paragraph discusses endangered species, stating that they are
always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of
extinction, which may be caused by chance events. The possibility of their
extinction, the passage states, depends only on the population size, and not
whether that population is increasing or decreasing.

For OG 111: This question asks about the organization of the passage as a whole. In the first
paragraph, the author tells about a situation that has been interpreted in a
particular way by environmentalists. The passage then proceeds to consider
whether that interpretation is valid, and while it does not come to a definitive
conclusion on that point, the final paragraph warns about the possible
consequences of not taking the action recommended by the environmentalists.

I hope this will be of some help!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2016
Posts: 1
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2016, 01:56
for Q3...im confused between D and E

for choice D, the explanation on OG said:
Quote:
the author suggests that the extinctions may have been caused by chance events, but there is not enough data to know whether or not this is probable.


but in passage:
Quote:
Moreover, chance events--which......--may lead to its extinction.


may = probably

so why we need to have enough data to know whether it was probable?
Board of Directors
User avatar
D
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3397
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2016, 02:22
Top Contributor
I think you miss the overall sense of the reading.

here we are talking of endangered species and that some of them recovered and some other are still on the border line. And that the environment could be wiped out where they live or not or blah blah.........but not is stated about option D.

Infact, if you notice a lot of species have recovered, which mean that their environment is not compromised after all.

Hope this helps
_________________
BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
P
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 508
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2017, 05:29
Hey GMATNinja GMATNinjatwo

Can you help explain Q3 and Q6?

3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the amphibian extinctions that have recently been reported?

(A) They have resulted primarily from human activities causing environmental degradation.
(B)They could probably have been prevented if timely action had been taken to protect the habitats of amphibian species.
(C) They should not come as a surprise, because amphibian populations generally have been declining for a number of years.
(D) They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events.
(E) They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation.

I was confused between D and E. Both seem to be correct. Can you let me know your thoughts here?

6. Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38?

(A) To give an example of a particular kind of study
(B) To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
(D) To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
(E) To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph

I clearly thought the answer is Option B, below is my reasoning

Quote:
Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past


- The report cannot distinguish among the possibilities
- Now the possibilities is mentioned in the above the bold statement

Quote:
Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population).


- with the above reasoning, i thought the answer should be clearly option B because the anecdotal report says it cannot distinguish among them.

Can you help me understand where I'm going wrong?
_________________
Retired Moderator
avatar
P
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 479
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2017, 04:53
pikolo2510 wrote:
Hey GMATNinja GMATNinjatwo

Can you help explain Q3 and Q6?

3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the amphibian extinctions that have recently been reported?

(A) They have resulted primarily from human activities causing environmental degradation.
(B)They could probably have been prevented if timely action had been taken to protect the habitats of amphibian species.
(C) They should not come as a surprise, because amphibian populations generally have been declining for a number of years.
(D) They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events.
(E) They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation.

I was confused between D and E. Both seem to be correct. Can you let me know your thoughts here?

6. Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38?

(A) To give an example of a particular kind of study
(B) To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
(D) To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
(E) To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph

I clearly thought the answer is Option B, below is my reasoning

Quote:
Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past


- The report cannot distinguish among the possibilities
- Now the possibilities is mentioned in the above the bold statement

Quote:
Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population).


- with the above reasoning, i thought the answer should be clearly option B because the anecdotal report says it cannot distinguish among them.

Can you help me understand where I'm going wrong?




Hello pikolo2510,

My 2 cents:

Quote:
3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the amphibian extinctions that have recently been reported?

(A) They have resulted primarily from human activities causing environmental degradation.
(B)They could probably have been prevented if timely action had been taken to protect the habitats of amphibian species.
(C) They should not come as a surprise, because amphibian populations generally have been declining for a number of years.
(D) They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events.
(E) They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation.

I was confused between D and E. Both seem to be correct. Can you let me know your thoughts here?


Though the author does suggest that extinctions could have occurred due to chance events, we don't have sufficient data to prove that and also the options lists that it occurred due to a combination of chance events. May or may not be true.

The author does make a point that several factors could have led to this effect but clearly there ain't enough evidence to prove that this is case of environmental degradation.

Between D and E, E seems more plausible.




Quote:
6. Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38?

(A) To give an example of a particular kind of study
(B) To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
(D) To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
(E) To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph


The main point was to raise an objection to the claim made in the first paragraph. The author uses modifiers such as 'if real, claims, which, in their view,' etc to show that he doesn't buy that theory. Also, he doesn't question the preceding sentence.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Posts: 78
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 620 Q43 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Apr 2018, 08:35
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) assess the validity of a certain view
(B) distinguish between two phenomena
(C) identify the causes of a problem
(D) describe a disturbing trend
(E) allay concern about a particular phenomenon

Why is B wrong? Most of the passage is explaining the difference between decline in population and extinction
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Posts: 78
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 620 Q43 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Apr 2018, 08:39
5. Which of the following most accurately describes the organization of the passage?

(A) A question is raised, a distinction regarding it is made, and the question is answered.
(B) An interpretation is presented, its soundness is examined, and a warning is given.
(C) A situation is described, its consequences are analyzed, and a prediction is made.
(D) Two interpretations of a phenomenon are described, and one of them is rejected as invalid.
(E) Two methods for analyzing a phenomenon are compared, and further study of the phenomenon is recommended.

I chose E for this one, why is it wrong?
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Apr 2018
Posts: 2
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2018, 07:13
Because in 1st para it clearly says about the report and an interpretation is made. Then in the following para words like evaluate the claim indicates that the author is trying to check the soundness and in the final para it is giving a clear cut warning( If you read the last line). I hope it helps
SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1716
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2018, 01:48
amphibians - live in water and land such as frogs, salamanders.
P1 - decline in population of A. Could be trend toward extinction.
P2 - evaluate P1. may be extinction, may be not.
p3 - biologists view, p decline = changed ecology .why? resolved - past fluctuations
p4 - long term data facts and its effects, if its too late then what - warning.


main idea - decline in A's population is discussed. past explored, facts evaluate for this decline.

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) assess the validity of a certain view -
(B) distinguish between two phenomena
(C) identify the causes of a problem
(D) describe a disturbing trend
(E) allay concern about a particular phenomenon

------------------------------------------------------

2. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the environmentalists mentioned in lines 5-6?
Pre-think - E are mentioned in P1. saying that if population decline then may be a trend toward extinction. So immediate environmental action is necessary. We need to look at author's view over this. Author's view is given in P2. Author is not so sure about it.

(D) They have drawn premature conclusions concerning a crisis in amphibian populations from recent reports of declines.

-----------------------------------------------------

3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the amphibian extinctions that have recently been reported?
Inferrnce question, following one of the option must be true.

(A) They have resulted primarily from human activities causing environmental degradation. --- not sure.
(B) They could probably have been prevented if timely action had been taken to protect the habitats of amphibian species. --- could be could be not.
(C) They should not come as a surprise, because amphibian populations generally have been declining for a number of years. --- but recovered too
(D) They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events. ---- may be a natural thing with them.
(E) They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation. --- true, not too extreme.

-----------------------------------------------------

4. According to the passage, each of the following is true of endangered amphibian species EXCEPT:
P2 has described a lot about this.
(D) Those with decreasing populations are the most likely candidates for immediate extinction. --- all correct except this .

----------------------------------------------------

5. Which of the following most accurately describes the organization of the passage?
refer to notes. --- a view is presented, evaluated, same view presented with diff angles, facts given and a warning

(A) A question is raised, a distinction regarding it is made, and the question is answered. ---- no question raised.
(B) An interpretation is presented, its soundness is examined, and a warning is given. --- this one is one same lines.
(C) A situation is described, its consequences are analyzed, and a prediction is made. --- 1 and 2 is right but last part is warning not prediction.
(D) Two interpretations of a phenomenon are described, and one of them is rejected as invalid. --- far from reality.
(E) Two methods for analyzing a phenomenon are compared, and further study of the phenomenon is recommended. ---- no.
----------------------------------------------------

6. Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38 [Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.]?

Pre-thinking - This is presented to weaken the reports and conclusions drawn from that report presented in P1.

(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph ---- on the same line.

(A) To give an example of a particular kind of study
(B) To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
(C) To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
(D) To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
(E) To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph
_________________
Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51 | Time management

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood
SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1716
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2018, 08:59
dewdrops909

2. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the environmentalists mentioned in lines 5-6?
Pre-think - E are mentioned in P1. saying that if population decline then may be a trend toward extinction. So immediate environmental action is necessary. We need to look at author's view over this. Author's view is given in P2. Author is not so sure about it.

(D) They have drawn premature conclusions concerning a crisis in amphibian populations from recent reports of declines.

If still not clear .... can you share your thinking around option C and why other choices are wrong ?
_________________
Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51 | Time management

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 60
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.61
CAT Tests
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Oct 2018, 02:48
Hi,

I have a confusion between choice C and D. I think even option C can??be the correct answer. Option C states 'Their certainty that population declines in general are caused by environmental degradation is not warranted.' As per my understanding, this is what the author believes about these environmentalists since?? in paragraph 3 the author talks about different types of population declines(habitual cycles being one of them). So, it's not necessarily true that if there is a population decline, environmental degradation would be the cause. So on what grounds can I eliminate optoin C?

Thanks
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 01 May 2018
Posts: 64
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Nov 2018, 00:52
hazelnut
aragonn

In question two
These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this “amphibian crisis,” which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.
This clearly shows that these environmentalists believed specifically that degradation is the reason. SO the correct answer seems C

In D They have drawn premature conclusions concerning a crisis in amphibian populations from recent reports of declines.
It might be the case that the environmentalists were concerned only of the decline and not the extinction. So, the answer doesnt seem correct.
Please help out.
SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1716
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Nov 2018, 05:08
singh8891 - What you have underlined is not the view of author, but it is the view of ' many environmentalists'. Author's view is given in P2. Author is not so sure about it. this is covered in P2. D is on these lines. Let me know if you need more clarity.
_________________
Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51 | Time management

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood
GMAT Club Bot
Re: There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian   [#permalink] 05 Nov 2018, 05:08

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 27 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne