It is currently 22 Sep 2017, 15:42

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

There is an finite number of elements in a sequence. What is

Author Message
Director
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 984

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 0

Location: South Korea
There is an finite number of elements in a sequence. What is [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Nov 2005, 07:38
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

13. There is an finite number of elements in a sequence. What is the sum of all the elements in that sequence?

(1) There are negative numbers to correspond with all positive numbers in that sequence with the same absolute value.
(2) The number of positive and negative elements is the same.
_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn !

Last edited by gamjatang on 01 Dec 2005, 00:28, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Location: London

Show Tags

26 Nov 2005, 08:18
Ans = A.

1. Sum = 0 as the alternate nos are the same, one positive and one negative
2. Insuff info can be any positive and any negative no.

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1480

Kudos [?]: 403 [0], given: 0

Location: Germany

Show Tags

26 Nov 2005, 08:30
C)...

1) -2 -1 1 2 YES -3 -2 -1 1 2 NO insuff
2) insuff

1)+2) suff

"there are negative numbers to correspond with all positive numbers" doesnt mean that all neg. numbers correspond with all pos n unless the number of elements is the same
_________________

If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.

Kudos [?]: 403 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Location: London

Show Tags

26 Nov 2005, 09:25
christoph wrote:
C)...

1) -2 -1 1 2 YES -3 -2 -1 1 2 NO insuff
2) insuff

1)+2) suff

"there are negative numbers to correspond with all positive numbers" doesnt mean that all neg. numbers correspond with all pos n unless the number of elements is the same

Wow.. you're right ..
we just tend to assume that it is the same case other way round as well that for every negative no there is a positive no

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3354

Kudos [?]: 316 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12

Show Tags

26 Nov 2005, 11:22
this is a tough one...

as cristoph explained...i had initially gone with A...

how wrong would I have been

Kudos [?]: 316 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 381

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 17

Location: Chicago, IL

Show Tags

26 Nov 2005, 14:00
Both (1) and (2) are sufficient. sum of n-terms in the sequence= middle value * n.
1) is insufficient. if n-number of terms is even, average is 0, then n+(n-1)+(n-2).....+=0. e.g. -5; -3; -1; 1; 3; 5 However, if n-odd, e.g -5; -3; -1; 1; 3; 5; 7=1. Middle number can have any value depending on the sequence, if n is odd.

2) also insufficient, middle value can'be found from the information given.

Cobining both statements will suffice, since n is even and -ve and +ve numbers correspond, n+(n-1)+(n-2)....=0
_________________

Hard work is the main determinant of success

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 17

Director
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 984

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 0

Location: South Korea

Show Tags

27 Nov 2005, 07:20
Suprisingly, C is not the OA.

Should I post the OA now or wait for Laxie to explain?
_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn !

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3354

Kudos [?]: 316 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12

Show Tags

27 Nov 2005, 11:25
OK I change my mind..its E...

(1)baiscally says that for all positive numbers there is an equal and positive negative number, however we dont know that for every negative number there is an equal positive number...insuff

(2) is also insufficient, there are equal number of negative numbers and given that we dont know the exact value of the numbers...

together, we still dont know the exact values of the negative numbers
say for example...

sequence is
-3, -2, -1, 2, 1, 1, so as you can see we have a repeat of positive number and we have an equal value negative number....the sum is -2....

sequence can also be
-3, -2, 2, 3...in this case the sum is 0...

Kudos [?]: 316 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 381

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 17

Location: Chicago, IL

Show Tags

27 Nov 2005, 20:40
fresinha12 wrote:
OK I change my mind..its E...

(1)baiscally says that for all positive numbers there is an equal and positive negative number, however we dont know that for every negative number there is an equal positive number...insuff

(2) is also insufficient, there are equal number of negative numbers and given that we dont know the exact value of the numbers...

together, we still dont know the exact values of the negative numbers
say for example...

sequence is
-3, -2, -1, 2, 1, 1, so as you can see we have a repeat of positive number and we have an equal value negative number....the sum is -2....

sequence can also be
-3, -2, 2, 3...in this case the sum is 0...

Well, yeah. But -3, -2, -1, 2, 1, 1 is not an algebraic sequence because the difference between the terms is not always the same. Am I right?
_________________

Hard work is the main determinant of success

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 17

SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2232

Kudos [?]: 369 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

28 Nov 2005, 09:47
Hmmm I believe that a sequence is basically a set where the order of elements is defined. In other words a, b, c is a different sequence of a, c, b. However a sequence doesn't have to have a certain formula for you to be able to derive each element. It doesn't even need to be monotonically increasing or decreasing, I believe.

In other words, -3, -2, -1, 2, 1, 1 can be a sequence, in my opinion.
_________________

Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.

Kudos [?]: 369 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 414

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Location: India, Chennai
Re: DS - (AG) Sum of sequence [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Nov 2005, 05:07
I would choose E, and my working is same as freshinha.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: DS - (AG) Sum of sequence   [#permalink] 29 Nov 2005, 05:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by