It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 12:06

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# There is little point in looking to artists for insights

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 651

Kudos [?]: 103 [3], given: 0

There is little point in looking to artists for insights [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 12:57
3
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (01:18) correct 35% (01:02) wrong based on 170 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

24. There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?

(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.

(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.

(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who s not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.

(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.

(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by JarvisR on 14 Mar 2016, 02:28, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 103 [3], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:22
My choice is E. The most diplomatic statement.

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:23
You're 1 second too late Anandk
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:24
Let us hope we are correct on this one unless kpadma has set some trap.

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 460

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Location: In the middle of nowhere
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:29
Bolis down to C and E...

I choose E..

Vivek.
_________________

"Start By Doing What Is Necessary ,Then What Is Possible & Suddenly You Will Realise That You Are Doing The Impossible"

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:43
I hesitated a bit on C but it cannot be the answer because from stimuli:
Most of them [artists] hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist.

Therefore, we cannot conclude that:
Every reasonably well-educated person who s not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:46
I thought the problem with C is "any artist" at the end.
Was it a LSAT question ?

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2004, 13:55
Right, any artist is what is wrong and should have been bolded. But every person who's not an artist is also wrong because it because it means that all of them are better than artists
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10130

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2014, 07:45
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2013
Posts: 60

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 35

GMAT Date: 01-08-2015
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2014, 23:33
C or E

for me, E would make sense:

E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.

This sentence: Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together. -> rarely means there is a realistic possibility. that means there ARE some artists no less ...

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 35

Intern
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2016, 14:52
I'm surprised LSAT questions have such flaws in their answers, especially those based on formal reasoning like this one. Not sure if the phrasing of the question - 'Which one of the following can be inferred' makes it ok but basic set theory shows that Option E does not follow logically.

Most can include 'all' too. While some clearly means greater than 0.

Still E is the best of the choices. Don't like that fact that LSAT makes some such lame jumps in logic, I thought only GMAT questions allow for loose logical reasoning.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3148

Kudos [?]: 3280 [2], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for insights [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2016, 13:13
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
cogen234 wrote:
I'm surprised LSAT questions have such flaws in their answers, especially those based on formal reasoning like this one. Not sure if the phrasing of the question - 'Which one of the following can be inferred' makes it ok but basic set theory shows that Option E does not follow logically.

Most can include 'all' too. While some clearly means greater than 0.

Still E is the best of the choices. Don't like that fact that LSAT makes some such lame jumps in logic, I thought only GMAT questions allow for loose logical reasoning.

The statement "most of X" does not include "all of X" (otherwise one would say "all of X") at least in GMAT - the mathematical analogy that you are trying to draw here (most of something means greater than 50% of that thing, including 100% of that thing) may lead you to clicking on the wrong answer or at least spending a few seconds unnecessarily on the test day. It is beneficial to think that most of something is more than 50%, but less than 100%, because 100% of something would imply all of that thing.

Kudos [?]: 3280 [2], given: 22

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Posts: 259

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 350

There is little point in looking to artists for insights [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2017, 02:34
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
(B) A thorough education in art makes a person reasonably well educated.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
_________________

We Shall Overcome... One day...

Last edited by broall on 17 May 2017, 02:27, edited 2 times in total.
Merged topic. Please search before posting

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 350

Intern
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 26

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 18

Location: India
GMAT 1: 540 Q35 V29
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2017, 03:17
E is the closest -

A - There are no artists who have insights into
political issues. - wrong - statement says most - not all
B - A thorough education in art makes a person
reasonably well educated. - out of scope - we don't know what education in art does to a person - Wrong

C - Every reasonably well-educated person who is
not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist. - Same - statement says most , not every or all - wrong
D - Politicians rarely have any artistic talent. - Statement does not say anything about politicians - wrong
E - Some artists are no less politically insightful
than some reasonably well-educated persons
who are not artists. - makes sense - most artists do not have insight - that means some do - CORRECT.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 18

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Posts: 269

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 906

Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: 314 Q167 V147
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2017, 08:36
IMHO,the following is my reasoning.

nahid78 wrote:
There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist.Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great,indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
-- This choice is too strong.The passage mentioned that artists are less insightful in political issue,not that they have none at all.

(B) A thorough education in art makes a person reasonably well educated.
-- One of the premise states that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together!!

(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
-- The passage just mentions most of well-educated people have more insight!!

(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
-- We know nothing about the politicians.

(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
-- CORRECT.

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 906

Intern
Joined: 06 Mar 2010
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Re: There is little point in looking to artists for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Feb 2017, 16:23
sleepynut wrote:
IMHO,the following is my reasoning.

nahid78 wrote:
There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist.Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great,indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
-- This choice is too strong.The passage mentioned that artists are less insightful in political issue,not that they have none at all.

(B) A thorough education in art makes a person reasonably well educated.
-- One of the premise states that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together!!

(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
-- The passage just mentions most of well-educated people have more insight!!

(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
-- We know nothing about the politicians.

(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
-- CORRECT.

It is very hard to understand E is the correct answer. Ans choice E says that "some artists are no less politically insightful" which means some are politically insightful than reasonably educated persons. The stimulus says " Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist"

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Aiming MBA
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 2497

Kudos [?]: 785 [0], given: 64

Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, Technology
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.65
WE: Information Technology (Health Care)
Re: There is little point in looking to artists for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2017, 06:31
vijaykvk wrote:
It is very hard to understand E is the correct answer. Ans choice E says that "some artists are no less politically insightful" which means some are politically insightful than reasonably educated persons. The stimulus says " Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist"

So, you are missing one point here.

If I am saying MOST of them are less insightful, This would mean atleast 1 is there who is no less insightful.

Say I have total 100 artists. I am saying 99 are less insightful (Take this as MOST are), it means atleast 1 is there who is no less or more insightful. Hence, E makes sense here.
_________________

V21 ---> V40!

Kudos [?]: 785 [0], given: 64

Re: There is little point in looking to artists for   [#permalink] 03 Apr 2017, 06:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by