Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

 It is currently 19 Jul 2019, 14:28

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountain

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

General GMAT Forum Moderator
Joined: 29 Jan 2015
Posts: 1312
Location: India
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountain  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 13 Jul 2019, 04:47
3
3
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (01:59) correct 46% (02:18) wrong based on 218 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountains were first discovered with a condition known as wasting disease. In 1970, two percent of the deer and elk killed by hunters were diagnosed with the disease. In 1995, that percentage had grown to six percent. This increase in the incidence of the disease proves that wasting disease has become much more prevalent in the last twenty-five years.

If true, which one of the following selections most seriously weakens the author’s conclusion?

(A) Wasting disease has not been discovered in domestic livestock or in moose or bighorn sheep, which are also found in significant numbers in the Rocky Mountains.

(B) Wasting disease tends to make deer and elk lethargic, making them more easily killed by hunters.

(C) Since it was first reported, wasting disease has occasionally been diagnosed in deer outside the Rocky Mountains.

(D) Hunters have grown more reluctant to cooperate with the authorities in reporting their deer and elk harvest, because if wasting disease is diagnosed in their harvest, the meat will be destroyed.

(E) It is very difficult to diagnose wasting disease more than twenty-four hours after death, so many cases of the disease have gone undiagnosed.

Source: Nova GMAT
Difficulty Level: 700

_________________
If you liked my post, kindly give me a Kudos. Thanks.

Originally posted by rohan2345 on 16 May 2017, 00:06.
Last edited by SajjadAhmad on 13 Jul 2019, 04:47, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 620
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
Re: Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountain  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 May 2017, 20:43
rohan2345 wrote:
Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountains were first discovered with a condition known as wasting disease. In 1970, two percent of the deer and elk killed by hunters were diagnosed with the disease. In 1995, that percentage had grown to six percent. This increase in the incidence of the disease proves that wasting disease has become much more prevalent in the last twenty-five years.

If true, which one of the following selections most seriously weakens the author’s conclusion?

(A) Wasting disease has not been discovered in domestic livestock or in moose or bighorn sheep, which are also found in significant numbers in the Rocky Mountains.
(B) Wasting disease tends to make deer and elk lethargic, making them more easily killed by hunters.
(C) Since it was first reported, wasting disease has occasionally been diagnosed in deer outside the Rocky Mountains.
(D) Hunters have grown more reluctant to cooperate with the authorities in reporting their deer and elk harvest, because if wasting disease is diagnosed in their harvest, the meat will be destroyed.
(E) It is very difficult to diagnose wasting disease more than twenty-four hours after death, so many cases of the disease have gone undiagnosed.

Doubt on OA..

The disease make deer lethargic .Hence ,they get killed by hunters.

In both the time frame ,argument is comparing effect of same disease on deer pop . How can we assume that in second case more killing happened because of symptoms. The Disease is same , so symptoms will be same in both the cases.Moreover,Nothing is mentioned about incubation period of disease .
Intern
Joined: 08 Mar 2016
Posts: 30
Re: Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountain  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 May 2017, 23:26
1
sobby wrote:
rohan2345 wrote:
Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountains were first discovered with a condition known as wasting disease. In 1970, two percent of the deer and elk killed by hunters were diagnosed with the disease. In 1995, that percentage had grown to six percent. This increase in the incidence of the disease proves that wasting disease has become much more prevalent in the last twenty-five years.

If true, which one of the following selections most seriously weakens the author’s conclusion?

(A) Wasting disease has not been discovered in domestic livestock or in moose or bighorn sheep, which are also found in significant numbers in the Rocky Mountains.
(B) Wasting disease tends to make deer and elk lethargic, making them more easily killed by hunters.
(C) Since it was first reported, wasting disease has occasionally been diagnosed in deer outside the Rocky Mountains.
(D) Hunters have grown more reluctant to cooperate with the authorities in reporting their deer and elk harvest, because if wasting disease is diagnosed in their harvest, the meat will be destroyed.
(E) It is very difficult to diagnose wasting disease more than twenty-four hours after death, so many cases of the disease have gone undiagnosed.

Doubt on OA..

The disease make deer lethargic .Hence ,they get killed by hunters.

In both the time frame ,argument is comparing effect of same disease on deer pop . How can we assume that in second case more killing happened because of symptoms. The Disease is same , so symptoms will be same in both the cases.Moreover,Nothing is mentioned about incubation period of disease .

Agreed, if the initial period saw 2% of deer and elk having those disease, then how can say that the increase to 6% is because of the symptoms of the same? Shouldn't the deer and elk show similar symptoms irrespective whenever it is ?

Saying that, because the deers are lethargic and can't move hence they are killed, and since the number is 6% now, it weakens the argument, makes no sense!
Manager
Status: Gmat lover
Joined: 27 Mar 2017
Posts: 84
Location: India
Schools: IIMA , IIMA PGPX"18
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.91
Re: Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountain  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 May 2017, 01:59
3
(A) Wasting disease has not been discovered in domestic livestock or in moose or bighorn sheep, which are also found in significant numbers in the Rocky Mountains. - irrelevant

(B) Wasting disease tends to make deer and elk lethargic, making them more easily killed by hunters. - correct

(C) Since it was first reported, wasting disease has occasionally been diagnosed in deer outside the Rocky Mountains. - irrelevant

(D) Hunters have grown more reluctant to cooperate with the authorities in reporting their deer and elk harvest, because if wasting disease is diagnosed in their harvest, the meat will be destroyed. - it in fact strengthens the argument. Incorrect

(E) It is very difficult to diagnose wasting disease more than twenty-four hours after death, so many cases of the disease have gone
undiagnosed - it strengthens the argument.The current actual number can rise the perccent. Incorrect
_________________
_________________
Rules for posting in verbal Gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need.

“The great secret of true success, of true happiness, is this: the man or woman who asks for no return, the perfectly unselfish person, is the most successful.”
-Swami Vivekananda
Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2013
Posts: 80
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q42 V29
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountain  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 May 2017, 02:52
1
rohan2345 wrote:
Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountains were first discovered with a condition known as wasting disease. In 1970, two percent of the deer and elk killed by hunters were diagnosed with the disease. In 1995, that percentage had grown to six percent. This increase in the incidence of the disease proves that wasting disease has become much more prevalent in the last twenty-five years.

If true, which one of the following selections most seriously weakens the author’s conclusion?

(A) Wasting disease has not been discovered in domestic livestock or in moose or bighorn sheep, which are also found in significant numbers in the Rocky Mountains.
(B) Wasting disease tends to make deer and elk lethargic, making them more easily killed by hunters.
(C) Since it was first reported, wasting disease has occasionally been diagnosed in deer outside the Rocky Mountains.
(D) Hunters have grown more reluctant to cooperate with the authorities in reporting their deer and elk harvest, because if wasting disease is diagnosed in their harvest, the meat will be destroyed.
(E) It is very difficult to diagnose wasting disease more than twenty-four hours after death, so many cases of the disease have gone undiagnosed.

I think its B as the deers and elks were killed earlier also and it doesn't make the disease prevalent.
_________________
Remember, if it is a GMAT question, it can be simplified elegantly.
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Posts: 304
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.81
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountain  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 May 2017, 20:50
Except B, all the other options are just bad. B is clearly the best among the lot, although not very convincing.
_________________
Citius, Altius, Fortius
Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2017
Posts: 244
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V41
Re: Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountain  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2018, 14:33
I still don't get how the correct answer should be B).

If the disease makes deer lethargic, then this effect has been constant over time. Thus, if more deer with this disease get shot, the increase can't be explain by the lehthargy. This argument is irrelevant imo.

The most logical answer to me was D), because if hunters hesitate to cooperate with the authorities they might not report every deer they shot. It is more probable that they don't report a dead deer with disease than one without disease, but we can't know that for sure. Hence, if hunters report lower numbers overall the statistic might perhaps not be representative. I am aware that this explanation isn't too satisyfing, but imo it's still better than the remaining answer choices.
_________________
My goal: 700 GMAT score - REACHED | My debrief - first attempt 710 (Q44,V41,IR7)

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 473
Location: India
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.5
Re: Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountain  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2018, 04:52
Masterscorp wrote:
I still don't get how the correct answer should be B).

If the disease makes deer lethargic, then this effect has been constant over time. Thus, if more deer with this disease get shot, the increase can't be explain by the lehthargy. This argument is irrelevant imo.

The most logical answer to me was D), because if hunters hesitate to cooperate with the authorities they might not report every deer they shot. It is more probable that they don't report a dead deer with disease than one without disease, but we can't know that for sure. Hence, if hunters report lower numbers overall the statistic might perhaps not be representative. I am aware that this explanation isn't too satisyfing, but imo it's still better than the remaining answer choices.

Hi Masterscorp.

My line of pre-thinking before analysing answer choices were exactly as yours and chose D. Still not convinced why B.
Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2017
Posts: 244
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V41
Re: Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountain  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2018, 13:22
hellosanthosh2k2 wrote:
Masterscorp wrote:
I still don't get how the correct answer should be B).

If the disease makes deer lethargic, then this effect has been constant over time. Thus, if more deer with this disease get shot, the increase can't be explain by the lehthargy. This argument is irrelevant imo.

The most logical answer to me was D), because if hunters hesitate to cooperate with the authorities they might not report every deer they shot. It is more probable that they don't report a dead deer with disease than one without disease, but we can't know that for sure. Hence, if hunters report lower numbers overall the statistic might perhaps not be representative. I am aware that this explanation isn't too satisyfing, but imo it's still better than the remaining answer choices.

Hi Masterscorp.

My line of pre-thinking before analysing answer choices were exactly as yours and chose D. Still not convinced why B.

Hi hellosanthosh2k2,

it's great to hear that you agree with my thinking. I guess we just have to deal with the fact that the correct answer given by the author of this question remains unclear to us.
We will move on and answer other questions, which are in line with your thinking, correctly - that's the spirit
_________________
My goal: 700 GMAT score - REACHED | My debrief - first attempt 710 (Q44,V41,IR7)

Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 774
Re: Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountain  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2018, 02:08
rohan2345 wrote:
Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountains were first discovered with a condition known as wasting disease. In 1970, two percent of the deer and elk killed by hunters were diagnosed with the disease. In 1995, that percentage had grown to six percent. This increase in the incidence of the disease proves that wasting disease has become much more prevalent in the last twenty-five years.

If true, which one of the following selections most seriously weakens the author’s conclusion?

(A) Wasting disease has not been discovered in domestic livestock or in moose or bighorn sheep, which are also found in significant numbers in the Rocky Mountains.
(B) Wasting disease tends to make deer and elk lethargic, making them more easily killed by hunters.
(C) Since it was first reported, wasting disease has occasionally been diagnosed in deer outside the Rocky Mountains.
(D) Hunters have grown more reluctant to cooperate with the authorities in reporting their deer and elk harvest, because if wasting disease is diagnosed in their harvest, the meat will be destroyed.
(E) It is very difficult to diagnose wasting disease more than twenty-four hours after death, so many cases of the disease have gone undiagnosed.

except for inference question, i alway try to criticize argument immediately after reading the argument. because criticization open up the way for answering all of cr problem.
Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Posts: 3
Re: Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountain  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2018, 15:00
Masterscorp wrote:
I still don't get how the correct answer should be B).

If the disease makes deer lethargic, then this effect has been constant over time. Thus, if more deer with this disease get shot, the increase can't be explain by the lehthargy. This argument is irrelevant imo.

The most logical answer to me was D), because if hunters hesitate to cooperate with the authorities they might not report every deer they shot. It is more probable that they don't report a dead deer with disease than one without disease, but we can't know that for sure. Hence, if hunters report lower numbers overall the statistic might perhaps not be representative. I am aware that this explanation isn't too satisyfing, but imo it's still better than the remaining answer choices.

Choice D must be INCORRECT. Because it is strengthening the argument main point. When the hunters hiding and do not reporting about their hunting, that means, still there are more evidence of such diseases that could be found, hence the increase in incidence is even very large than expected. Perfect strengthen choice. so eliminate it.
Re: Thirty years ago, deer and elk in selected parts of the Rocky Mountain   [#permalink] 07 Mar 2018, 15:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by