It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 17:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 269

Kudos [?]: 278 [0], given: 25

Location: India
Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2010, 08:44
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

72% (01:39) correct 28% (02:02) wrong based on 143 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who vacationed in foreign countries was very small compared with the large percentage of the British population who travel abroad for vacations now. Foreign travel is, and always has been, expensive from Britain. Therefore, British people must have, on average, more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago.
The argument requires assuming which one of the following?
(A) If foreign travel had been less expensive 30 years ago, British people would still not have had enough money to take vacation abroad.
(B) If travel to Britain were less expensive, more people of other countries would travel to Britain for their vacations.
(C) If the percentage of British people vacationing abroad was lower 30 years ago, then the British people of 30 years ago must have spent more money on domestic vacations.
(D) If more of the British people 30 years ago had had enough money to vacation abroad, more would have done so.
(E) If British people are now wealthier than they were 30 years ago, then they must have more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago.
I am struggling with D and E.

OA is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D
. Can somebody explain for me?
_________________

Cheers,
SD

Last edited by SudiptoGmat on 21 Feb 2010, 12:06, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 278 [0], given: 25

Manhattan Prep Instructor
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 347

Kudos [?]: 1684 [1], given: 11

Location: San Francisco
Re: CR - British people who vacationed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Feb 2010, 11:45
1
KUDOS
Hey All,

I'm wondering where this questions came from, because if the official answer really is E (as you seem to say), I can't agree. It draws the wrong connection.

Conclusion: British people have more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago.

Premises: 30 years ago, small percentage of British vk'd abroad. Way more now. VK'ing abroad is expensive.

Assumption: It has anything to do with money.

(A) If foreign travel had been less expensive 30 years ago, British people would still not have had enough money to take vacation abroad.
Problem: We don't need this to make the argument. In fact, it weakens our argument. We want people to travel if they have enough money to do so.

(B) If travel to Britain were less expensive, more people of other countries would travel to Britain for their vacations.
Problem: We don't care about people of other countries.

(C) If the percentage of British people vacationing abroad was lower 30 years ago, then the British people of 30 years ago must have spent more money on domestic vacations.
Problem: Domestic vacations are not part of this argument either.

(D) If more of the British people 30 years ago had had enough money to vacation abroad, more would have done so.
Answer: Let's try the NOT test (if we take the opposite of the correct assumption, the argument should fall apart) to prove this one. "If more of the British people 30 years ago had had enough money to vacation abroad, more would NOT have done so." Now we have a problem. The passage wants to link the taking of vacations with having enough money to do so, but this now says that when people have enough money to travel, they don't necessarily do so. That destroys the point.

(E) If British people are now wealthier than they were 30 years ago, then they must have more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago.
Problem: This is linking money in general to vacation money, but we're not concerned with money in general. If we take the opposite of this ("If British people are now wealthier than they were 30 years ago, they do not necessarily spend more on vacations") [paraphrase], the argument is still fine.

Not sure where this question came from, but if the answer IS E, I'm not seeing it.

Hope that helps!
_________________

Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Kudos [?]: 1684 [1], given: 11

Intern
Joined: 27 Sep 2009
Posts: 40

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 4

Re: CR - British people who vacationed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2010, 09:50
I think its D.
The author is assuming that Brits from 30years ago did not make foreign travel just cuz they did not have enuff money. That may not be true. Maybe Brits from 30 years ago thot that foreign countries were not as beautiful as Britain, maybe they did not get visas at that time, we don't know
But by making that assumption D he is saying that Brits from 30 years ago always wanted foreign vacation but could not afford it and now that percentage of foreign travel is up that means Brits have more money at their disposal for vacationing.

SudiptoGmat wrote:
Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who vacationed in foreign countries was very small compared with the large percentage of the British population who travel abroad for vacations now. Foreign travel is, and always has been, expensive from Britain. Therefore, British people must have, on average, more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago.
The argument requires assuming which one of the following?
(A) If foreign travel had been less expensive 30 years ago, British people would still not have had enough money to take vacation abroad.
(B) If travel to Britain were less expensive, more people of other countries would travel to Britain for their vacations.
(C) If the percentage of British people vacationing abroad was lower 30 years ago, then the British people of 30 years ago must have spent more money on domestic vacations.
(D) If more of the British people 30 years ago had had enough money to vacation abroad, more would have done so.
(E) If British people are now wealthier than they were 30 years ago, then they must have more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago.
I am struggling with D and E.

OA is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
E
. Can somebody explain for me?

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - British people who vacationed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2010, 12:33
imo d

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 269

Kudos [?]: 278 [0], given: 25

Location: India
Re: CR - British people who vacationed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Feb 2010, 12:07
Sorry tommy OA is D not E. I have corrected my original post.
_________________

Cheers,
SD

Kudos [?]: 278 [0], given: 25

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 588

Kudos [?]: 467 [0], given: 412

GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Re: CR - British people who vacationed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2010, 04:54
Good Question its D

Kudos [?]: 467 [0], given: 412

Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 236

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Re: CR - British people who vacationed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2010, 06:17
D is the best.
Not e because, it links more money to travel directly, not to willingness to travel. The argument is about people who are willing to travel, but do not do it for economic reasons.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Intern
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 49

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 18

Re: CR - British people who vacationed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2011, 15:46
It's D.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 18

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1628

Kudos [?]: 1124 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: CR - British people who vacationed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2011, 00:23
+1 D
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1124 [0], given: 109

Intern
Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - British people who vacationed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2011, 07:57
"D"

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 91

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Re: CR - British people who vacationed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2011, 23:31
+1 D

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 888

Kudos [?]: 735 [0], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Re: Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Dec 2011, 02:13
D
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 735 [0], given: 44

Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 169

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 6

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Re: Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2011, 11:50
D IMO

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 255

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 110

Re: Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2012, 04:05
Nice question. D is the answer. It fills the gap that if British people 30 years ago had had more money, they would have vacationed abroad. This ties the premises to the conclusion.
_________________

Consider KUDOS if you feel the effort's worth it

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 110

Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2011
Posts: 80

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Re: Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2012, 21:59
Going for D.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 12 May 2013
Posts: 81

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 12

Re: Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2014, 09:22
can we not eliminate E because it is restating the conclusion

(E) If British people are now wealthier than they were 30 years ago, then they must have more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago.

Thank you

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 12

Re: Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who   [#permalink] 18 Aug 2014, 09:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by