It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 13:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# This one problem is from Sarnia. In the hope that she will

Author Message
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

This one problem is from Sarnia. In the hope that she will [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2004, 05:28
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This one problem is from Sarnia. In the hope that she will give an OA soon, I post this question here to see what other people think. I think it is a good question.

Some accountants calculate with simple adding machines, and some use complex computers. One can perform more calculations in less time with a computer than with an adding machine. Therefore assuming the cost of using the two types of machines are equal, an accountant who uses a computer generally can earn more per hour than an accountant who uses an adding machine

Which one of the following is an assumption that would make the conclusion in the passage a logical one?

1) The more calculations an accountant perform, the more money he or she will earn

2) In general, accountants vary in terms of the number of calculations they make and the amount of money they earn
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 424

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: Aus

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2004, 08:29
I feel the answer should be A. The second statement seems to give an additional information that is not the assumption made in this question stem.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 460

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Location: In the middle of nowhere

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2004, 10:06
It seems to be 1....

But I guess Paul wont re-post this question..just like that..there would be some trap...

Vivek.
_________________

"Start By Doing What Is Necessary ,Then What Is Possible & Suddenly You Will Realise That You Are Doing The Impossible"

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2004, 11:35
First of all I didnt want to reply to this question. But what the heck

There are two problems with Choice 2.
First the word "generally". This immidiately puts the choice 2 in a gray area.
Second let us negate this -
In general, accountants do not vary in terms of the number of calculations they make and the amount of money they earn
The accountants may not vary in number of calculations they make. But given some equipment they can definitely boost their capabilities to do more computations. So the negation infact supports the argument.

If a negation of an assumption makes the argument fall apart then that assumption is perfect

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2003
Posts: 82

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2004, 11:42
A is the OA and Paul I have been really busy. You took your exam and don't have the stress that those of us that have not taken this bloody exam yet have.
Quote:
First of all I didnt want to reply to this question. But what the heck

_________________

Thanks
Sarnia

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2004, 11:45
Hi sarnia,

I am in the same state as you are.

Anand.

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 20 Jan 2004
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: KZ

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2004, 00:48
I do feel comfortable with (1). Another choice contributes nothing.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Posts: 186

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

Location: work chair

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2004, 02:59
i'd go with (1) also, but what is the official answer? and why there are only 2 options?

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: This one problem is from Sarnia. In the hope that she will [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2016, 03:38
Do't have much explanatio for it, but 1 seems good.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Apr 2013
Posts: 277

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 856

Re: This one problem is from Sarnia. In the hope that she will [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2016, 03:07
Paul wrote:
This one problem is from Sarnia. In the hope that she will give an OA soon, I post this question here to see what other people think. I think it is a good question.

Some accountants calculate with simple adding machines, and some use complex computers. One can perform more calculations in less time with a computer than with an adding machine. Therefore assuming the cost of using the two types of machines are equal, an accountant who uses a computer generally can earn more per hour than an accountant who uses an adding machine

Which one of the following is an assumption that would make the conclusion in the passage a logical one?

1) The more calculations an accountant perform, the more money he or she will earn

2) In general, accountants vary in terms of the number of calculations they make and the amount of money they earn

Is the OA 2?

I think 1 is an inference and 2 is an assumption. Let me give it a try

what is stated in the passage :

1. Some accountants use calculators and some use computers.
2. Accountants who use calculators can make more money if they use computers.

These points considered together, point to two things.
1. There are accountants who use computers make more calculations.
2. Because it is stated in the passage that accountants can make more money if they use computers, which means that the accountants who are using computers are making more money, there are differently earning accountants present.

Option 1 also looks good..But would pick 2.
_________________

Spread some love..Like = +1 Kudos

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 856

Re: This one problem is from Sarnia. In the hope that she will   [#permalink] 16 Apr 2016, 03:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# This one problem is from Sarnia. In the hope that she will

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.