It is currently 20 Sep 2017, 13:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Those influenced by modern Western science take it for

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 586

Kudos [?]: 268 [0], given: 0

Those influenced by modern Western science take it for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 May 2005, 17:28
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

60% (01:35) correct 40% (01:11) wrong based on 10 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

18. Those influenced by modern Western science take it for granted that a genuine belief in astrology is proof of a credulous and unscientific mind. Yet, in the past, people of indisputable intellectual and scientific brilliance accepted astrology as a fact. Therefore, there is no scientific basis for rejecting astrology.

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?

(A) A belief can be consistent with the available evidence and accepted scientific theories at one time but not with the accepted evidence and theories of a later time.
(B) Since it is controversial whether astrology has a scientific basis, any argument that attempts to prove that it has will be specious.
(C) Although the conclusion is intended to hold in all cultures, the evidence advanced in its support is drawn only from those cultures strongly influenced by modern Western science.
(D) The implicit assumption that all practitioners of Western science believe in astrology is false.
(E) The fact that there might be legitimate nonscientific reasons for rejecting astrology has been overlooked.

Kudos [?]: 268 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 May 2005, 20:56
A is the answer. It refers to timeline since "in the past, people of indisputable intellectual "

B Out of scope

C. Evidence never mentions western culture

D.Strong statement and contrary to argument

E.Out of scope.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 84

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 May 2005, 07:19
A

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 43

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 May 2005, 07:46
A seems correct...

(B) Since it is controversial whether astrology has a scientific basis, any argument that attempts to prove that it has will be specious.
... where does the passage say anything of this sort

(C) Although the conclusion is intended to hold in all cultures, the evidence advanced in its support is drawn only from those cultures strongly influenced by modern Western science.
.... what cultures influenced by modern westenr science... it is people influenced by modern
western science

(D) The implicit assumption that all practitioners of Western science believe in astrology is false.

that leaves us with A and E...

A seems more relevant than E in the present context..
hence A.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

19 May 2005, 09:12
A for me too

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 557

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 May 2005, 09:17
One of those you never care about what the other options say.
click (A), move on.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 May 2005, 23:45
A.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 586

Kudos [?]: 268 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 May 2005, 07:04
The OA is A.

Kudos [?]: 268 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 453

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 May 2005, 15:53
yep A

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 11

Location: China
Concentration: Healthcare, Entrepreneurship
WE: Sales (Health Care)
Re: Those influenced by modern Western science take it for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2016, 01:47
can someone please explain it more explicitly? I just don't understand what is A talking about.
_________________

LSAT CR is driving me mad

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 11

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 28 Nov 2014
Posts: 924

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 79

Concentration: Strategy
Schools: Fisher '19 (M)
GPA: 3.71
Re: Those influenced by modern Western science take it for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2016, 03:07
Those influenced by modern Western science take it for granted that a genuine belief in astrology is proof of a credulous and unscientific mind. Yet, in the past, people of indisputable intellectual and scientific brilliance accepted astrology as a fact. Therefore, there is no scientific basis for rejecting astrology.

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?

(A) A belief can be consistent with the available evidence and accepted scientific theories at one time but not with the accepted evidence and theories of a later time.

Option A captures the flaw nicely. It might be possible that in the past, indisputable intellectual and scientific brilliance accepted *astrology as a fact* because there were reasonable evidence and scientific theories to prove it at the point in time. However, "astrology as a fact* might not be accepted with the theories available at a later time.

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 79

Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 11

Location: China
Concentration: Healthcare, Entrepreneurship
WE: Sales (Health Care)
Re: Those influenced by modern Western science take it for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2016, 04:28
Keats wrote:
Those influenced by modern Western science take it for granted that a genuine belief in astrology is proof of a credulous and unscientific mind. Yet, in the past, people of indisputable intellectual and scientific brilliance accepted astrology as a fact. Therefore, there is no scientific basis for rejecting astrology.

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?

(A) A belief can be consistent with the available evidence and accepted scientific theories at one time but not with the accepted evidence and theories of a later time.

Option A captures the flaw nicely. It might be possible that in the past, indisputable intellectual and scientific brilliance accepted *astrology as a fact* because there were reasonable evidence and scientific theories to prove it at the point in time. However, "astrology as a fact* might not be accepted with the theories available at a later time.

so why in time there were evidence and at a later time there's no evidence to support astrology as a fact? what part of the stimuli is vulnerable, premise or conclusion?
_________________

LSAT CR is driving me mad

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 11

Re: Those influenced by modern Western science take it for   [#permalink] 15 Oct 2016, 04:28
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among 6 16 Dec 2015, 03:46
10 Under the influence of today s computer-oriented culture, 7 25 Jan 2017, 03:12
2 The influence of McTell's work on Waters' formulation of 7 19 Feb 2016, 01:56
10 The water temperature in an estuary is influenced by 10 21 Sep 2016, 03:15
6 Mystic: Unfortunately, modern science often dismisses mystical experie 4 16 Oct 2015, 02:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by