It is currently 19 Jan 2018, 15:39

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that

Author Message
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1878

Kudos [?]: 1510 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 01:39
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

47.Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that short-term temperature data are an inadequate means of predicting long-term trends and point out that the scientific community remains divided on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does.

(A) on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does
(B) on whether warming that occurs will be significant and the impact it would have
(C) as to whether significant warming will occur or the impact it would have if it did
(D) over whether there will be significant warming or the impact it will have
(E) over whether significant warming will occur and what impact it would have

My head goes around something when I face with the similarity!
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1510 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 523

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Re: SC.Prep. No disscuss before! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 03:19
sondenso wrote:
47.Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that short-term temperature data are an inadequate means of predicting long-term trends and point out that the scientific community remains divided on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does.

(A) on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does
(B) on whether warming that occurs will be significant and the impact it would have
(C) as to whether significant warming will occur or the impact it would have if it did
(D) over whether there will be significant warming or the impact it will have
(E) over whether significant warming will occur and what impact it would have

My head goes around something when I face with the similarity!

divided over...and...is correct usage. Ans E.

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 685

Kudos [?]: 651 [0], given: 0

Re: SC.Prep. No disscuss before! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 03:23
I will go with E

Divided Over is the proper usage then
over whether significant warming will occur and what impact it would have -> proper tense usage

if X will the what Would kind of..
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Kudos [?]: 651 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1790

Kudos [?]: 1123 [0], given: 5

Location: New York
Re: SC.Prep. No disscuss before! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 03:38
sondenso wrote:
47.Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that short-term temperature data are an inadequate means of predicting long-term trends and point out that the scientific community remains divided on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does.

(A) on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does
(B) on whether warming that occurs will be significant and the impact it would have
(C) as to whether significant warming will occur or the impact it would have if it did
(D) over whether there will be significant warming or the impact it will have
(E) over whether significant warming will occur and what impact it would have

My head goes around something when I face with the similarity!

C, D -> "or" is wrong here. it should be "and"
For me "divided over" more idiomatic than " divided on" inthis situation.
So I chose E.

whether... what... goes in parallel (both are questioning act as pronouns)
B is out.

Its between A and E.

A) on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does
= whether significant warming will occur and what impact will warming have if warming does
hmmm!!! both looks parallel... but second part looks little suspicious.

if warming does, what impact [url]will warming have[/url]
it should be...
if warming does, what impact warming will have

E) whether significant warming will occur and what impact it would have
= whether significant waming will occur and what impact warmig would have
(sounds ok to me..)

I may be wrong..
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Kudos [?]: 1123 [0], given: 5

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 314

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 4

Location: Washington DC
Re: SC.Prep. No disscuss before! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 05:05
I would go for E. As E uses would correctly instead of convoluted second half of A.

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 4

Director
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 726

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

Re: SC.Prep. No disscuss before! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 05:57
E.
1)Divided over looks right
Every other option introduces some error.

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1790

Kudos [?]: 1123 [0], given: 5

Location: New York
Divided Over vs Divded on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 06:12
Flollowing setences mostly from major news paper/tv channells.

Can some one explain when to use "divided over" and "divided on"

Police divided over detention limit
Doctors Divided Over Warning Strike
UEFA divided over how to deal with players who dive
Economists divided over Russian inflation cause

Organized labor divided on Clinton, Obama -( CNN.com)
Nation Is Divided on Drawdown Of Troops (washington post)
Dem Senators Divided on Obama's Call for Repealing Defense of ...
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Last edited by x2suresh on 09 Jun 2008, 06:45, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 1123 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2008
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Schools: Chicago R2
Re: SC.Prep. No disscuss before! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 06:36
crazy one
I want to improve both:
A) on whether significant warming will occur and what impact it will have if it does
E) over whether significant warming will occur and what impact it will have
Regarding ON vs OVER with divided both seem acceptable choices. Nonetheless I'm looking for a native speakers to prove/reject my opinion.
My choice is E because in A if it does seems redundant for me

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2008
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Schools: Chicago R2
Re: SC.Prep. No disscuss before! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 06:50
barfer wrote:
crazy one
I want to improve both:
A) on whether significant warming will occur and what impact it will have if it does
E) over whether significant warming will occur and what impact it will have
Regarding ON vs OVER with divided both seem acceptable choices. Nonetheless I'm looking for a native speakers to prove/reject my opinion.
My choice is E because in A if it does seems redundant for me

Oh my God, now I changed my point of view... I forgot about the reverse order in english grammar. So that A is quite good from that perspective. But E still has the problem with "would". With 80 % likelihood GMAT votes for A.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 57

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Location: United Kingdom
Re: SC.Prep. No disscuss before! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 09:22
stuck between A and E .Will go for A here
A uses correct tenses although "if it does" is redundant

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 May 2008
Posts: 110

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Location: São Paulo
Re: SC.Prep. No disscuss before! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 16:07
I think E is the best answer, but I'm not sure when to use "divided over", or "divided on"

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1878

Kudos [?]: 1510 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Re: SC.Prep. No disscuss before! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 17:43
If E is the best, why E should not be: "will....will" or "would....would"? But "will....would..." and we must assume that they are parallel only because we have no other reasons? Really funny, do you think so?
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1510 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 01 May 2008
Posts: 110

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Location: São Paulo
Re: SC.Prep. No disscuss before! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 17:48
I think the will...would is correct in this case, because it's conditional, I mean, if the weather warming occurs, then we don't know what impacts it would have.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1878

Kudos [?]: 1510 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Re: SC.Prep. No disscuss before! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2008, 18:33
ldpedroso wrote:
I think the will...would is correct in this case, because it's conditional, I mean, if the weather warming occurs, then we don't know what impacts it would have.

Oh, thanks Idp, among all useful reasonings here, I like yours most, it is very clear for me!

About divided on or over, x2suresh, I think either is correct, depending on what you prefer only!

Thanks all of you.

OA is E
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1510 [0], given: 1

Re: SC.Prep. No disscuss before!   [#permalink] 09 Jun 2008, 18:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by