GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 05 Dec 2019, 16:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 107
Location: Manchester UK
Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2009, 14:13
3
11
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

79% (01:41) correct 21% (01:55) wrong based on 721 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Project CR Butler:Day 9:Critical Reasoning (CR1)

Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead birds found in agricultural areas after pesticide sprayings. Pesticide manufacturers claimed that the publicity given to bird deaths stimulated volunteers to look for dead birds, and that the increase in numbers reported was attributable to the increase in the number of people looking.

Which of the following statements, if true, would help to refute the claim of the pesticide manufacturers?

(A) The publicity given to bird deaths was largely regional and never reached national proportions.

(B) Pesticide sprayings were timed to coincide with various phases of the life cycles of the insects they destroyed.

(C) No provision was made to ensure that a dead bird would not be reported by more than one observer.

(D) Initial increases in bird deaths had been noticed by agricultural workers long before any publicity had been given to the matter.

(E) Dead birds of the same species as those found in agricultural areas had been found along coastal areas where no farming took place.
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 145
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2009, 14:29
1
1
1
I thinkn it should be D. The pesticide manufacturers claim that bc there was so much publicity people started to look for dead birds and thus the number of dead birds reported increased. D states that that agricultural workers noticed an increase in the number of dead birds even before the publicity. That contradicts the statement that the publicity effect and not the actual pesticides caused the number of dead birds reported to go up.
Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 87
Location: USA
Schools: IU KSB
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2009, 15:16
sagarsabnis wrote:
Why cant the answer be E

OA is D

E kind of supports the manufacturer's claim that pesticide used for agriculture is not responsible for bird death but some other factor is responsible for it, that's why dead birds are found not only at agricultural area but also at other areas .
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 145
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2009, 16:40
Answer E states that, "Dead birds of the same species as those found in agricultural areas had been found along coastal areas where no farming took place." "No farming took place" indicates that the dead birds were found in areas where no pesticide was used. If dead birds of the same species were found in both places, then it's hard to blame the pesticides as the cause of death for the birds. It strengthens the manufacturer's statements rather then weakening it.
Intern
Joined: 07 Dec 2013
Posts: 5
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Feb 2014, 19:52
why cant the answer be 'C' . I strongly thought it would be C
Director
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 563
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Feb 2014, 06:36
Nivigmat wrote:
why cant the answer be 'C' . I strongly thought it would be C

Hey Nivigmat,
The conclusion here is that "it's not the pesticide's fault that more dead birds are reported"
The reasoning is that more people are now consciously looking for dead birds.
The implication here is that the bird deaths haven't increased since pesticide use.

We are to weaken this argument.
Look at C and E.

C) No provision was made to ensure that a dead bird would not be reported by more than one observer. To translate this: more people reported about the same bird more than once - exaggerating the number of dead birds: this supports the argument made
(E) Dead birds of the same species as those found in agricultural areas had been found along coastal areas where no farming took place. This suggests that birds outside of the pesticide use area have also died- This ALSO strengthens the argument that "it isn't the pesticide's fault!"

Only D weakens the augment-
(D) Initial increases in bird deaths had been noticed by agricultural workers long before any publicity had been given to the matter.
This breaks the assumption that bird deaths haven't increases and also refutes the reasoning that the deaths were over represented through publicity.

Option D is therefore the apt response.

Hope that clarifies things!

_________________
- CrackVerbal Prep Team

Register for the Free GMAT Kickstarter Course : http://bit.ly/2DDHKHq

Register for our Personal Tutoring Course : https://www.crackverbal.com/gmat/personal-tutoring/

Join the free 4 part GMAT video training series : http://bit.ly/2DGm8tR
Intern
Joined: 12 Nov 2018
Posts: 3
Location: India
GPA: 3.86
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2018, 10:35
1
(A) The publicity given to bird deaths was largely regional and never reached national proportions....out of scope

(B) Pesticide sprayings were timed to coincide with various phases of the life cycles of the insects they destroyed...irrelevant

(C) No provision was made to ensure that a dead bird would not be reported by more than one observer....will support the manufaturer's claim

(D) Initial increases in bird deaths had been noticed by agricultural workers long before any publicity had been given to the matter.......perfect choice

(E) Dead birds of the same species as those found in agricultural areas had been found along coastal areas where no farming took place.....out of scope

+1 for D
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2434
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2018, 08:05
Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead birds found in agricultural areas after pesticide sprayings. Pesticide manufacturers claimed that the publicity given to bird deaths stimulated volunteers to look for dead birds, and that the increase in numbers reported was attributable to the increase in the number of people looking.

Which of the following statements, if true, would help to refute the claim of the pesticide manufacturers?
Boil it down- the publicity given to bird deaths stimulated volunteers to look for dead birds, and that the increase in numbers reported was attributable to the increase in the number of people looking.

(A) The publicity given to bird deaths was largely regional and never reached national proportions. - Irrelevant

(B) Pesticide sprayings were timed to coincide with various phases of the life cycles of the insects they destroyed. - Irrelevant - the timing of Pesticide sprayings to coincide with insects lifecycles has no bearing

(C) No provision was made to ensure that a dead bird would not be reported by more than one observer. - mild strengthener - If this statement is true, then maybe the number of dead birds REPORTED was more than the ACTUAL number of dead birds

(D) Initial increases in bird deaths had been noticed by agricultural workers long before any publicity had been given to the matter. - Correct - weakens - EFFECT occurred before the claimed CAUSE

(E) Dead birds of the same species as those found in agricultural areas had been found along coastal areas where no farming took place. - Irrelevant - this does provide some basis that the pesticide may not be responsible for the increase in birds deaths

_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Posts: 109
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jan 2019, 02:36
but we are not told that agricultural workers reported the noticed dead birds. In case they did not report the increase so it has nothing to do with the argument. I do not agree with D.
Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2017
Posts: 77
Location: India
Schools: Yale '19, GMBA '20, XLRI
GMAT 1: 660 Q46 V35
GPA: 3.8
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jan 2019, 04:05
faltan wrote:
but we are not told that agricultural workers reported the noticed dead birds. In case they did not report the increase so it has nothing to do with the argument. I do not agree with D.

you are correct in thinking so. But extend the reasoning a little.

Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead birds found in agricultural areas after pesticide sprayings. Pesticide manufacturers claimed that the publicity given to bird deaths stimulated volunteers to look for dead birds, and that the increase in numbers reported was attributable to the increase in the number of people looking.

CONCLUSION : increase in people looking --->> increase in reporting.

Which of the following statements, if true, would help to refute the claim of the pesticide manufacturers?

(A) The publicity given to bird deaths was largely regional and never reached national proportions.

(B) Pesticide sprayings were timed to coincide with various phases of the life cycles of the insects they destroyed.

(C) No provision was made to ensure that a dead bird would not be reported by more than one observer.

(D) Initial increases in bird deaths had been noticed by agricultural workers long before any publicity had been given to the matter.
If they had reported the deaths before publicity, then definitely there was some other factor that led them to do so. But they did not. Thus people noticed deaths and did not report at that time. So increase in people looking did not have any effect on increase in reporting now also. (whether publicity or no publicity). What publicity did was do make people aware of the deaths that they already had been noticing. So no real contribution to get people report.
correct.

(E) Dead birds of the same species as those found in agricultural areas had been found along coastal areas where no farming took place.
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Posts: 109
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jan 2019, 04:16
kanakdaga wrote:
faltan wrote:
but we are not told that agricultural workers reported the noticed dead birds. In case they did not report the increase so it has nothing to do with the argument. I do not agree with D.

you are correct in thinking so. But extend the reasoning a little.

Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead birds found in agricultural areas after pesticide sprayings. Pesticide manufacturers claimed that the publicity given to bird deaths stimulated volunteers to look for dead birds, and that the increase in numbers reported was attributable to the increase in the number of people looking.

CONCLUSION : increase in people looking --->> increase in reporting.

Which of the following statements, if true, would help to refute the claim of the pesticide manufacturers?

(A) The publicity given to bird deaths was largely regional and never reached national proportions.

(B) Pesticide sprayings were timed to coincide with various phases of the life cycles of the insects they destroyed.

(C) No provision was made to ensure that a dead bird would not be reported by more than one observer.

(D) Initial increases in bird deaths had been noticed by agricultural workers long before any publicity had been given to the matter.
If they had reported the deaths before publicity, then definitely there was some other factor that led them to do so. But they did not. Thus people noticed deaths and did not report at that time. So increase in people looking did not have any effect on increase in reporting now also. (whether publicity or no publicity). What publicity did was do make people aware of the deaths that they already had been noticing. So no real contribution to get people report.
correct.

(E) Dead birds of the same species as those found in agricultural areas had been found along coastal areas where no farming took place.

thanks, and "c" sounds even opposite.
Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2017
Posts: 77
Location: India
Schools: Yale '19, GMBA '20, XLRI
GMAT 1: 660 Q46 V35
GPA: 3.8
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jan 2019, 04:44
faltan wrote:
kanakdaga wrote:
faltan wrote:
but we are not told that agricultural workers reported the noticed dead birds. In case they did not report the increase so it has nothing to do with the argument. I do not agree with D.

you are correct in thinking so. But extend the reasoning a little.

Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead birds found in agricultural areas after pesticide sprayings. Pesticide manufacturers claimed that the publicity given to bird deaths stimulated volunteers to look for dead birds, and that the increase in numbers reported was attributable to the increase in the number of people looking.

CONCLUSION : increase in people looking --->> increase in reporting.

Which of the following statements, if true, would help to refute the claim of the pesticide manufacturers?

(A) The publicity given to bird deaths was largely regional and never reached national proportions.

(B) Pesticide sprayings were timed to coincide with various phases of the life cycles of the insects they destroyed.

(C) No provision was made to ensure that a dead bird would not be reported by more than one observer.

(D) Initial increases in bird deaths had been noticed by agricultural workers long before any publicity had been given to the matter.
If they had reported the deaths before publicity, then definitely there was some other factor that led them to do so. But they did not. Thus people noticed deaths and did not report at that time. So increase in people looking did not have any effect on increase in reporting now also. (whether publicity or no publicity). What publicity did was do make people aware of the deaths that they already had been noticing. So no real contribution to get people report.
correct.

(E) Dead birds of the same species as those found in agricultural areas had been found along coastal areas where no farming took place.

thanks, and "c" sounds even opposite.

No provision was made. But do we have a little more certainty that people may have reported the same death? Do we have certainty that the same bird was counted while calculating the the total reporting? It is just informing that no provision was there. It is trap answer.

PLEASE KUDOS IF THIS HELPS! :D
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1487
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 May 2019, 22:08
There is a similar question. Clearly, the pattern here is about refuting a claim by weaking the premise. In this question, the premise is weakened by another fact.
Here is structure of the argument.
The first sentence is a fact.
The second question is the claim.
Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2019
Posts: 9
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2019, 11:19
sagarsabnis wrote:
[textarea]

Project CR Butler:Day 9:Critical Reasoning (CR1)

Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead birds found in agricultural areas after pesticide sprayings. Pesticide manufacturers claimed that the publicity given to bird deaths stimulated volunteers to look for dead birds, and that the increase in numbers reported was attributable to the increase in the number of people looking.

Which of the following statements, if true, would help to refute the claim of the pesticide manufacturers?

(A) The publicity given to bird deaths was largely regional and never reached national proportions.

(B) Pesticide sprayings were timed to coincide with various phases of the life cycles of the insects they destroyed.

(C) No provision was made to ensure that a dead bird would not be reported by more than one observer.

(D) Initial increases in bird deaths had been noticed by agricultural workers long before any publicity had been given to the matter.

(E) Dead birds of the same species as those found in agricultural areas had been found along coastal areas where no farming took place.

Option (D) is correct. As per this option, the increase in bird deaths was observed by agricultural workers in the very initial stage. This clearly refutes the claim that the increase in numbers reported was attributable to the increase in the number of people looking. The increase was observed earlier than any publicity.
Re: Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead bir   [#permalink] 23 Jul 2019, 11:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by