To determine whether there are deposits of frozen water on the moon

I thank all of you for participating. The Answer is A. The source of this question is the Princeton Verbal Workout book

The OE is as follows:

You should use analyzing at the beginning of the phrase, because thats what the satellite did. Because NASA launched two satellites, it's incorrect to refer to them as a technique;eliminate B and E. C is incorrect because "to the analysis" is unidiomatic. And you can cross of D because to analyze is not complete. It would have been better if they had said used to analyze

Thank you very much gmataquaguy, you helped me clear my parallelism concepts.

I thought this fell under the parallelism of gerunds.
This example is straight from my notes

Gerunds go with gerunds, and infinitives go with infinitives. Don’t mix gerunds and infinitives.
Wrong: Skiing is as strenuous as to rappel down a cliff.
Right: To sky is as strenuous as to rappel down a cliff

That is why, I thought "to determine" is parallel to "to analyze".

Thanks

Can you please explain why to analyze "is not complete".....!!

Analyzing seems reasonable....but on what basis we opt out to analyze.

Hi AJ8348.

D is wrong for sure. Let me give you another example
The computer system was upgraded TO AVOID stealing information.

You think this sentence is correct or not? It's definitely wrong.When you see infinitive, let examine the subject. Make sure the main subject and the infinitive are sensible. Can the computer system avoid stealing info by itself? Not, It cannot. So, we can change the sentence like:

The computer system was upgraded TO KEEP IT from stealing information.

The problem in D is the same. Can two unmanned satellites analyze radar echoes? No, they cannot do so by themselves. D should be changed like: To be used for analyzing.......

Does it help?. Let me know.

Regards.

I went for A because the modifier refers to satellites.

But I think E is fine also. Does anyone have a clear explanation on why E is wrong?

satellites orbited. how did they orbit? this how is explained by "the comma+analyzing" modifier. so A is correct.
E - what does 'technique" refer to? orbiting? launching? this choice is wrong because of no clear referant for this modifier.

Hi,

the Verb+ing modifier should modify the subject of the preceding clause. So in this case, isn't 'analyzing' modifying ' research scientists at NASA '? This will alter the intended meaning.
Am I missing anything here?

Satellites orbited is the previous clause and analyzing refers to subject satellites and analyzing explains how satellites orbited.

Posted from my mobile device

1st action.. 2nd action.. ing, standard format, this is not a 700 level question IMO.

I have the same question. Can experts clarify this doubt.

GMATNinja

Isn't analyzing refering to the action launched. Verb-ing modifier can either modifier subject or the action of preceding clause. Here subject of preceding clause is scientists, and action is launched. The modifier modifies neither. Am i am wrong in my analysis?

why does it not refer to the scientists at the beginning of the sentence? The ing structure could also describe the hole preceding clause instead of just the last part.

There are two clauses to choose from, either of which could be modified by "analyzing radar echoes from the lunar surface."

One clause is "research scientists at NASA launched two unmanned satellites that orbited the moon's atmosphere."

It does not make sense to say that research scientists at NASA launched two unmanned satellites, analyzing radar echoes from the lunar surface.

The other clause is "that orbited the moon's atmosphere."

If we choose this second clause, we get "that orbited the moon's atmosphere, analyzing radar echoes from the lunar surface."

In this case the agent of "analyzing" is "that," which refers to "unmanned satellites."

Since it's fairly logical to say that unmanned satellites orbited the moon's atmosphere, analyzing radar echoes from the lunar surface, choice (A) works.

[quote="MartyTargetTestPrep"] Can you help me understand why Option D is wrong?

The version created via the use of (D) is just slightly illogical because it doesn't really make sense that a satellite would "orbit ... to analyze."

By the way, does the moon have an atmosphere? and even if it does, would a satellite orbit the atmosphere? I don't think the answer to either of those questions is "Yes."

GMATNinja:

Why is 'to analyze' wrong? (Option D)

scientists launched unmanned satellites (that....) to analyze radar echoes from lunar surface.

'to analyze' here refers that scientists launched the unmanned satellites to analyze something. The meaning and construction looks good to me. What am I missing?

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.