It is currently 21 Nov 2017, 05:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 157

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 6

Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2011, 11:02
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (01:39) correct 41% (01:53) wrong based on 320 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Today’s farmers plant only a handful of different
strains of a given crop. Crops lack the diversity that
they had only a few generations ago. Hence, a disease
that strikes only a few strains of crops, and that would
have had only minor impact on the food supply in the
past, would devastate it today.
Which one of the following, if true, would most
weaken the argument?
(A) In the past, crop diseases would often devastate
food supplies throughout entire regions.
(B) Affected crops can quickly be replaced from
seed banks that store many strains of those
crops.
(C) Some of the less popular seed strains that were
used in the past were more resistant to many
diseases than are the strains popular today.
(D) Humans today have more variety in their diets
than in the past, but still rely heavily on cereal
crops like rice and wheat.
(E) Today’s crops are much less vulnerable to
damage from insects or encroachment by
weeds than were crops of a few generations
ago.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 6

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 871

Kudos [?]: 401 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: Today’s farmers plant only a handful [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2011, 11:27
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Conclusion : A disease that strikes just a few strains will devastate the food supply.
Evidence : Farmers plant few strains

If the affected crops can be replaced then the effect of the destruction can be annulled. This is exactly B.

vjsharma25 wrote:
Today’s farmers plant only a handful of different
strains of a given crop. Crops lack the diversity that
they had only a few generations ago. Hence, a disease
that strikes only a few strains of crops, and that would
have had only minor impact on the food supply in the
past, would devastate it today.
Which one of the following, if true, would most
weaken the argument?
(A) In the past, crop diseases would often devastate
food supplies throughout entire regions.
(B) Affected crops can quickly be replaced from
seed banks that store many strains of those
crops.
(C) Some of the less popular seed strains that were
used in the past were more resistant to many
diseases than are the strains popular today.
(D) Humans today have more variety in their diets
than in the past, but still rely heavily on cereal
crops like rice and wheat.
(E) Today’s crops are much less vulnerable to
damage from insects or encroachment by
weeds than were crops of a few generations
ago.

Kudos [?]: 401 [0], given: 123

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 157

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 6

Re: Today’s farmers plant only a handful [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2011, 11:45
Why not (E) ?
Can't we relate insects to the disease?

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 409

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 115

Reviews Badge
Re: Today’s farmers plant only a handful [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2011, 11:47
vjsharma25 wrote:
Why not (E) ?
Can't we relate insects to the disease?

Exactly. We cannot assume that insects=disease. Hence, E is ruled out.

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 115

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1972

Kudos [?]: 743 [0], given: 355

Concentration: Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Today’s farmers plant only a handful [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2014, 11:21
heygirl wrote:
vjsharma25 wrote:
Why not (E) ?
Can't we relate insects to the disease?

Exactly. We cannot assume that insects=disease. Hence, E is ruled out.


Oh I see very clever.

Cheers!

J :)

Kudos [?]: 743 [0], given: 355

SDA Bocconi Thread Master
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Posts: 36

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 34

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Premium Member
Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2014, 18:05
Why not A?
If I can prove that in the past also food supplies were devastated due to diseases, so we cant blame today's farming styles completely?

Regards,
DJ

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 34

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 623

Kudos [?]: 535 [1], given: 16

Location: India
Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2014, 22:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
vjsharma25 wrote:
Today’s farmers plant only a handful of different
strains of a given crop. Crops lack the diversity that
they had only a few generations ago. Hence, a disease
that strikes only a few strains of crops, and that would
have had only minor impact on the food supply in the
past, would devastate it today.
Which one of the following, if true, would most
weaken the argument?
(A) In the past, crop diseases would often devastate
food supplies throughout entire regions.
(B) Affected crops can quickly be replaced from
seed banks that store many strains of those
crops.
(C) Some of the less popular seed strains that were
used in the past were more resistant to many
diseases than are the strains popular today.
(D) Humans today have more variety in their diets
than in the past, but still rely heavily on cereal
crops like rice and wheat.
(E) Today’s crops are much less vulnerable to
damage from insects or encroachment by
weeds than were crops of a few generations
ago.


Negate the conclusion

It is: The disease that strikes the few strains of crops would not devastate the food supply

Since this is a weaken question look for the choice that offers an explanation for the above.

Choice B offers the reason why the food supply would not be devastated. None of the others do.
_________________

Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna
http://www.sravnatestprep.com/regularcourse.php

Premium Material
Standardized Approaches

Kudos [?]: 535 [1], given: 16

SDA Bocconi Thread Master
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Posts: 36

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 34

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Premium Member
Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2014, 05:36
SravnaTestPrep wrote:
vjsharma25 wrote:
Today’s farmers plant only a handful of different
strains of a given crop. Crops lack the diversity that
they had only a few generations ago. Hence, a disease
that strikes only a few strains of crops, and that would
have had only minor impact on the food supply in the
past, would devastate it today.
Which one of the following, if true, would most
weaken the argument?
(A) In the past, crop diseases would often devastate
food supplies throughout entire regions.
(B) Affected crops can quickly be replaced from
seed banks that store many strains of those
crops.
(C) Some of the less popular seed strains that were
used in the past were more resistant to many
diseases than are the strains popular today.
(D) Humans today have more variety in their diets
than in the past, but still rely heavily on cereal
crops like rice and wheat.
(E) Today’s crops are much less vulnerable to
damage from insects or encroachment by
weeds than were crops of a few generations
ago.


Negate the conclusion

It is: The disease that strikes the few strains of crops would not devastate the food supply

Since this is a weaken question look for the choice that offers an explanation for the above.

Choice B offers the reason why the food supply would not be devastated. None of the others do.


But how can B negate? Just asking. Once a set of crops get disease, how would new seeds will help the crops? We will have to plant the seeds again to get a disease free produce.

My thinking is that devastation is blamed entirely on lack of diversity in today's ways of agriculture.
So negation of this can be: If devastation has occured in the past as well due to diseases.

Regards,
DJ

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 34

Expert Post
Director
Director
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 623

Kudos [?]: 535 [0], given: 16

Location: India
Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2014, 05:56
akashganga wrote:
SravnaTestPrep wrote:
vjsharma25 wrote:
Today’s farmers plant only a handful of different
strains of a given crop. Crops lack the diversity that
they had only a few generations ago. Hence, a disease
that strikes only a few strains of crops, and that would
have had only minor impact on the food supply in the
past, would devastate it today.
Which one of the following, if true, would most
weaken the argument?
(A) In the past, crop diseases would often devastate
food supplies throughout entire regions.
(B) Affected crops can quickly be replaced from
seed banks that store many strains of those
crops.
(C) Some of the less popular seed strains that were
used in the past were more resistant to many
diseases than are the strains popular today.
(D) Humans today have more variety in their diets
than in the past, but still rely heavily on cereal
crops like rice and wheat.
(E) Today’s crops are much less vulnerable to
damage from insects or encroachment by
weeds than were crops of a few generations
ago.


Negate the conclusion

It is: The disease that strikes the few strains of crops would not devastate the food supply

Since this is a weaken question look for the choice that offers an explanation for the above.

Choice B offers the reason why the food supply would not be devastated. None of the others do.


But how can B negate? Just asking. Once a set of crops get disease, how would new seeds will help the crops? We will have to plant the seeds again to get a disease free produce.

My thinking is that devastation is blamed entirely on lack of diversity in today's ways of agriculture.
So negation of this can be: If devastation has occured in the past as well due to diseases.

Regards,
DJ


Hi DJ,

What my method does is to negate the conclusion and see which choice offers the best explanation for the negated conclusion in the case of a weaken question. The negated conclusion is that, the food supply would not be devastated. Choice B offers the reason why the food supply would not be devastated. Choice A does not offer the reason for the negated conclusion.
_________________

Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna
http://www.sravnatestprep.com/regularcourse.php

Premium Material
Standardized Approaches

Kudos [?]: 535 [0], given: 16

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 130

Kudos [?]: 110 [1], given: 1

Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2014, 07:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
PREMISES: farmers plant only some strains ... so diversity is less
CONC: diseases (strike only few strains) will be more devastating today

Option A: talking about the past /irrelevant
Option B: talking about a solution
Option C: Comparing the past less popular strains and present popular strains /irrelevant
Option D: talks about diets / irrelevant
Option E: talking about insects or weeds not diseases /irrelevant

Hence, B is the answer.
_________________

76000 Subscribers, 7 million minutes of learning delivered and 5.6 million video views

Perfect Scores
http://perfectscores.org
http://www.youtube.com/perfectscores

Kudos [?]: 110 [1], given: 1

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10125

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2015, 20:53
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 21 Sep 2015
Posts: 32

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 10

CAT Tests
Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Nov 2017, 08:58
There's a reason why this isn't a GMATPrep question: it's weak as a weaken question.

The actual answer (B) Affected crops can quickly be replaced from
seed banks that store many strains of those crops.

This is a very weak weakener. Replace is a very vague word here and usually when we replace something...we assume that we replace the broken item with a similar item. This works on light bulbs but NOT on genetic modification. If a disease is mutated to affect the few genetic strains of crops today, we NEED brand NEW strands of a different genetic characteristic. Replacing the same strands actually does NOT help.

Because all the other answers are even more out of bounds..this is the correct answer.

If you got this wrong, don't worry about it too much. :D
_________________

Insanity at its finest.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 10

Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of   [#permalink] 10 Nov 2017, 08:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.