Top college graduates are having more difficulty : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 27 Feb 2017, 12:33

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Top college graduates are having more difficulty

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1134
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

23 Jan 2007, 07:05
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Top college graduates are having more difficulty demonstrating their superiority to prospective employers than did the top students of twenty years ago when an honors degree was distinction enough. Todayâ€™s employers are less impressed with the honors degree. Twenty years ago no more than 10 percent of a given class graduated with honors. Today, however, because of grade inflation, the honors degree goes to more than 50 percent of a graduating class. Therefore, to restore confidence in the degrees they award, colleges must take steps to control grade inflation.
Which one of the following is an assumption that, if true, would support the conclusion in the passage?

(A) Todayâ€™s students are not higher achievers than the students of twenty years ago.
(B) Awarding too many honors degrees causes colleges to inflate grades.
(C) Todayâ€™s employers rely on honors ranking in making their hiring decisions.
(D) It is not easy for students with low grades to obtain jobs.
(E) Colleges must make employers aware of the criteria used to determine who receives an honors degree.
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 734
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 4

Show Tags

23 Jan 2007, 07:17
I would go with A.

If today's students are higher achievers, then we can't blame the way universities are giving their grades.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 392
Location: Boston, MA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

23 Jan 2007, 07:45
aurobindo wrote:
I would go with A.

If today's students are higher achievers, then we can't blame the way universities are giving their grades.

A for same reasons.
VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1134
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

27 Jan 2007, 05:57
OA is A. B is wrong because...?
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 361
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

27 Jan 2007, 18:11
kripalkavi wrote:
OA is A. B is wrong because...?

Awarding too many honors degrees cann't cause colleges to inflate grades, as the batch may be studious

But grade inflation causes the increase in honors students .. is possible
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 268
Location: California
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

27 Jan 2007, 23:18
A..
VP
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1443
Schools: Chicago Booth '11
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 12

Show Tags

02 Feb 2007, 14:22
easy A
02 Feb 2007, 14:22
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Top college graduates are having more difficulty 9 11 Jul 2012, 22:56
1 Top college graduates are having more difficulty 13 28 Jul 2009, 10:22
48 Top college graduates are having more difficulty 50 20 Jul 2008, 23:12
2 Top college graduates are having more difficulty 10 06 Jun 2008, 07:08
Top college graduates are having more difficulty 11 22 May 2007, 08:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by