Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 10:24 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 10:24

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 5330
Own Kudos [?]: 35490 [4]
Given Kudos: 9464
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 May 2019
Posts: 785
Own Kudos [?]: 1040 [0]
Given Kudos: 101
Send PM
General Discussion
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 5330
Own Kudos [?]: 35490 [3]
Given Kudos: 9464
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2019
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
1
Kudos
is the answer D? simple past tense
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2019
Posts: 364
Own Kudos [?]: 281 [2]
Given Kudos: 35
Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, General Management
Schools:
GPA: 3.75
WE:Pharmaceuticals (Health Care)
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Real family income excluding the effects of inflation, has rapidly risen from 1960 up to 1970 but virtually does not change from 1970 up to 1980.


A) has rapidly risen from 1960 up to 1970 but virtually does not change from 1970 up. Use of up to is redundant when already risen is used.

B) arose with rapidity from 1960 up to 1970 and was virtually unchanged from 1970. Use of up to is redundant when already risen is used.

C) rose with rapidity from 1960 to 1970 and virtually is unchangeable from 1970. is refers to present tense and is incorrect also and should not be used here.

D) rose rapidly from 1960 to 1970 but was virtually unchanged from 1970. Correct use of tenses and the conjunction but is used correctly to introduce contrast.

E) rapidly rises from 1960 to 1970 and virtually is unchangeable from 1970. Incorrect tense used rises. past tense should be used

IMO D

IMO D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2019
Status:Student
Posts: 478
Own Kudos [?]: 369 [1]
Given Kudos: 52
Location: United States
Concentration: Accounting, Finance
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V35
GPA: 3.9
WE:Education (Accounting)
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
1
Kudos
All the years mentioned passed a long time ago, so I feel simple past is appropriate for this case. 'Up' after from 1960 is not necessary. IMHO D is the correct option.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Posts: 202
Own Kudos [?]: 305 [1]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 490 Q44 V15
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GRE 1: Q165 V155
GPA: 3.05
WE:Analyst (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
1
Kudos
“Rapidly” is more precise than “with rapidity” with same meaning. BC out.
“From x to y” is a better expression for stating a time PERIOD. “Up to” is used to express the last Point in time.
A, B OUT.
It’s a past event. So present tense wil be inappropriate. E out.
D is my answer.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Posts: 202
Own Kudos [?]: 305 [0]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 490 Q44 V15
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GRE 1: Q165 V155
GPA: 3.05
WE:Analyst (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
Would anyone please explain whether “rose” or “had risen” would be more appropriate here and why?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Posts: 202
Own Kudos [?]: 305 [0]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 490 Q44 V15
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GRE 1: Q165 V155
GPA: 3.05
WE:Analyst (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
Isn’t single COMMA in between SUBJECT (income) and VERB (rose) WRONG here?
What’s the difference between ROSE and AROSE here?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2018
Posts: 140
Own Kudos [?]: 180 [1]
Given Kudos: 294
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
GMAT 2: 630 Q42 V34
GMAT 3: 660 Q48 V34
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Real family income excluding the effects of inflation, has rapidly risen from 1960 up to 1970 but virtually does not change from 1970 up to 1980.

The idiom "from X UP to Y" is incorrect (Correct: "from X to Y"). So for this simple reason, A and B are out.

Quote:
A) has rapidly risen from 1960 up to 1970 but virtually does not change from 1970 up
- as explained above: violation of idiom "from X to Y"

Quote:
B) arose with rapidity from 1960 up to 1970 and was virtually unchanged from 1970
- same as in A

Quote:
C) rose with rapidity from 1960 to 1970 and virtually is unchangeable from 1970
- Present Simple is not correct as the sentence talks about past event. Also, (just preference): be + adjective ("is unchangeable") is stylistically worse than action verb.

Quote:
D) rose rapidly from 1960 to 1970 but was virtually unchanged from 1970
- Correct

Quote:
E) rapidly rises from 1960 to 1970 and virtually is unchangeable from 1970
- Present Simple does not work for past events.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2016
Status:Studying 4Gmat
Posts: 366
Own Kudos [?]: 96 [1]
Given Kudos: 314
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 590 Q37 V33
GPA: 4
WE:Law (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Yello!

This question is testing IDIOM from X to Y.
And meaning: whether to use conjunction (and) or contrast (but) word

From x to Y, is correct idiom, eliminate A and B

Between C,D and E – But is needed to present the contrast, Hence D is the answer.

Further,
In “E” rapidly rises is incorrect in this sentence, it sounds as if it is a recurring event, which happens cyclically.

In “C” “rose with rapidity” what the heck.

SO D is the right answer
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Jul 2014
Posts: 92
Own Kudos [?]: 103 [1]
Given Kudos: 233
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
1
Kudos
BelalHossain046 wrote:
Would anyone please explain whether “rose” or “had risen” would be more appropriate here and why?
"

"rose" will be apt here. Per my understanding, when the time of past action is mentioned using time modifiers such as after, before, yesterday, last year, specific years, past perfect is not needed. I believe that would create sort of redundancy, if I am not wrong. Though it is not an exact grammar rule, when given a choice between rose and had risen, with time modifier, I would choose an option with rose.

Does that answer your question?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2018
Posts: 349
Own Kudos [?]: 313 [1]
Given Kudos: 254
Location: United States
WE:General Management (Other)
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Quote:
Real family income excluding the effects of inflation, has rapidly risen from 1960 up to 1970 but virtually does not change from 1970 up to 1980.


Quick read-through reveals that the sentence tests such things as comparison and meaning. We are dealing with income in two different, but adjacent, time periods. Because we are talking about time periods, we do not need to use "up to". One can say that a car has a tank that can contain up to 10 gallons of gas. When we talk about time periods, we use "to. For instance, "the average income of NHL players rose dramatically from 2000 to 2019". So, we have a 2-3 split and can immediately eliminate options (A) and (B).

A) has rapidly risen from 1960 up to 1970 but virtually does not change from 1970 up
Out for the reasons discussed above.

B) arose with rapidity from 1960 up to 1970 and was virtually unchanged from 1970
Out for the reasons discussed above.

C) rose with rapidity from 1960 to 1970 and virtually is unchangeable from 1970
The phrase rose with rapidity is weird. It is so much better and concise to say rose [how?] rapidly.

D) rose rapidly from 1960 to 1970 but was virtually unchanged from 1970
This option is neat and solves the issues addressed above.

E) rapidly rises from 1960 to 1970 and virtually is unchangeable from 1970
We are talking about events from the past. So, we should use a Past Tense. This option is not as clean as option (D). Also, we have two things that we try to compare: the growth of income from 1960 to 1970 and the growth (absence of growth) from 1970 to 1980. rapidly rises and virtually is unchangeable is not the best way to convey what the sentence is trying to say. At the very least, the sentence could have said "rose rapidly from 1960 to 1970 and did not change from 1970 to 1980"

generis there is a comma in the non-underlined portion of the sentence. I wonder whether it is needed? If so, do we need another comma to separate a modifiers that talks about the inflation, i.e. "Real family income, excluding the effects of inflation, ... "? Thank you.
VP
VP
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Posts: 1488
Own Kudos [?]: 2301 [1]
Given Kudos: 114
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q169 V168

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
1
Kudos
My answer is (D). It took me 42 seconds.

The major issue with (A) is its use of tense. It talks about the past but uses present tense.

Equipped with such realization, I can immediately rule out (A), (C), (E).

Now, between (B) and (D), I did not like the use of Arise in (B) so went for (D) first. Reading D assures me that is the right option.

Now, looking back B, I can tell that "with rapidity" is an awkward and wordy way to say "rapidly".

Also, Arise is used to talk about situations such as opportunities, problems, needs etc.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 60
Own Kudos [?]: 122 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
1
Kudos
BelalHossain046 wrote:
Isn’t single COMMA in between SUBJECT (income) and VERB (rose) WRONG here?
What’s the difference between ROSE and AROSE here?


IMO, Sentence structure is Noun Phrase modifier + verb . "excluding the effects of inflation" modifies Income.

'has rapidly risen" - verb refers to the subject 'Income'.

Rise is an intransitive verb that refers to the act of moving from a lower position to a higher position. It can indicate the upwards movement of an object as well as a change in social position. The past tense of rise is rose and risen is its past participle form.

Arise is an intransitive verb that refers to the act of emerging or originating. This mostly indicates an emergence of a problem, new situation or opportunity. Arise is mainly used with abstract nouns. Arose is the past tense of arise and arisen is the past participle of arise.

Please refer to below link for more info.

https://www.quora.com/Whats-the-differe ... d-to-arise
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 5330
Own Kudos [?]: 35490 [0]
Given Kudos: 9464
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
Expert Reply
The official explanation is here.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2023
Posts: 152
Own Kudos [?]: 59 [0]
Given Kudos: 59
Location: India
Schools: Booth '26
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.2
Send PM
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
The grammatically correct sentence is D. "Real family income, excluding the effects of inflation, rose rapidly from 1960 to 1970 but was virtually unchanged from 1970." The sentence uses the past tense of the verb “rise” and correctly employs the conjunction “but” to indicate a contrast between the two time periods.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Real family income excluding the effects of inflation has rapidly rise [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne