mehtakaustubh,
workout: thanks for posting the para. the question 1 is really interesting, it's classic example of double negation.
vishusahni9,
JarvisR --> For question 1, we will have to infer the meaning by referring to 4th para. let me try.
———
The question is —>
1. The passage suggests that the fable is superior to the parable and the tale for none of the following reasons EXCEPT:
I. the fable contains a moral lesson within its narrative.
II. the parable‘s message may be too enigmatic for a reader to comprehend.
III. the tale is a chronicle of recent historical events.
A. I only
B. I and II
C. II and III
D. I, II, and III
E. None of the above
————
My interpretation of the question:
What are the reasons to call out the fable superior to parable/tale?
My analysis:
---
I. the fable contains a moral lesson within its narrative.
This is clearly given in the 2nd para:
the true Fable, if it rises to its high requirements, ever aims at one great end and purposeConclusion: So ‘I’ is a valid option.
---
II. the parable‘s message may be too enigmatic for a reader to comprehend.
For this refer last para:
It will contain, like the Tale, a short but real narrative; it will seek, like the Parable, to convey a hidden meaning, not so much by the use of language, as by the skilful introduction of fictitious characters; and yet unlike to either Tale or Parable, it will ever keep in view, as its high prerogative, and inseparable attribute, the great purpose of instruction,How to interpret:
let's separate out 2 sentences:
Sentence 1:
It will contain, like the Tale, a short but real narrative; it will seek, like the Parable, to convey a hidden meaning, not so much by the use of language, as by the skilful introduction of fictitious charactersSignificance: above sentence means fable and parable share similar intention of conveying hidden meaning but fable does it by using fictitious characters.
Sentence 2:
and yet unlike to either Tale or Parable, it will ever keep in view, as its high prerogative, and inseparable attribute, the great purpose of instructionSignificance: Fable unlike Parable clearly explains the great purpose of instructions.
Now if we combine significance of both of these sentences, it is clear that even though parable tries to explain the hidden meaning, it doesn't clearly call out the instructions/meaning/action, A fable does!
In another words, Parable is is difficult to comprehend. Dictionary meaning of enigmatic also refers as 'difficult to comprehend'.
Conclusion: So ‘II’ is a valid option. Fable is superior to parable as parable doesn't explain the instructions clearly.
---
III. the tale is a chronicle of recent historical events.
Again, let's refer to the first section of last para:
The Fable partly agrees with, and partly differs from the Tale and the Parable.
It will contain, like the Tale, a short but real narrative;
The second section of last para calls out:
The Tale consists simply of the narration of a story either founded on facts, or created solely by the imagination, and not necessarily associated with the teaching of any moral lesson.
Significance: If we combine both of these statements, we understand that both (fable and tale ) explain the facts. Hence option 3 does not necessarily makes a fable better.
Conclusion: So ‘III’ is NOT a valid option.
---
This perfectly aligns with OA --> option B
I hope this is clear now.
—
Give Kudos even if you disagree