Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 30 May 2017, 04:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Posts: 199
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2008, 19:15
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

73% (02:12) correct 27% (01:45) wrong based on 308 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?

A) The many fatal stroke and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.

B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.

OA to follow.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 787
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 193 [0], given: 0

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2008, 19:22
A
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1897
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 1122 [3] , given: 1

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2008, 19:33
3
KUDOS
RyanDe680 wrote:
Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?

A) The many fatal stroke and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.

B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.

OA to follow.

I really like the way Gmac make reasoning! It is really close to life!

Certain medical expense: 1000 USD
By use treament to prevent strokes and heart deaseas, you saved 1/4 that expense, it means: 1/4*1000 =200 USD

You had 200 USD saved to keep in your pockets, but you still claimed that NO ECONOMIC JUSTIFICAITON FOR THAT TREATMENT. Really funny! Do you think so? In the daily life, the author may say: should not take that the treament.

How to attack this conclusion! If you do not take that treatment, you will loss even more than the expense required of that treatment due to strokes and heart disease.

A
_________________
CEO
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2954
Followers: 61

Kudos [?]: 601 [0], given: 210

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2008, 20:47
A
RyanDe680 wrote:
Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. <-- premise 1

Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. <-- premise 2

Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension. <-- conclusion

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above? <-- weaken the conclusion

A) The many fatal stroke and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts. <-- BINGO

B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.

OA to follow.
VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1442
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 285 [0], given: 0

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 May 2008, 07:15
RyanDe680 wrote:
Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?

A) The many fatal stroke and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.

B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.

OA to follow.

A...
Current Student
Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Posts: 585
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Schools: Ross '12 (MBA/MS)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 34

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 May 2008, 01:04
A. "Large economic losses of other sorts" weakens the conclusion that "there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension".
_________________
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Posts: 43
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 4

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2011, 06:05
Yahsek wrote:
A. "Large economic losses of other sorts" weakens the conclusion that "there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension".

Hi can you tell me how this line 'Large economic losses of other sorts' weaken the stated conclusion
Manager
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 188
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.82
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 72

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2014, 06:36
Only A and D looks good for me.

D is lack of information so i went with A

Rrsnathan
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10296
Followers: 1001

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 May 2016, 10:23
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 150
Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 24

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 May 2016, 06:29
Idea here is to weaken the conclusion that there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension. Choice A tells though medical expenditures are insignificant, many fatal strokes and heart attacks cause other severe economic losses. Hence preventive treatment for hypertension is economically justified.
_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks

"Pay attention to every detail"

Intern
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 2
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2017, 10:29
A looks perfect !
However, I took a little over 3 minutes.
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 460
Location: United States
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 823

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2017, 22:37
Conclusion :- "there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension".
Weaken :- "there is economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension"

So its structure is the following:
- treating hypertension postpones other medical costs because it prevents heart disease
- the money saved by treating hypertension is only 1/4 of the money needed to treat the hypertensive population
- conclusion: there is no economic reason behind treating hypertension

So to my understanding, you save some money by preventing heart disease and strokes, but the amount you save is not big enough to cover the expenses for everyone suffering from hypertension. You have a classical case of costs and benefits and net effect:
- costs: treatment of hyperension
- benefits: money saved because of the preventive treatment of hypertension
- net effect: benefits - costs --- the argument says it's not big enough to justify treating hypertension. We are looking for options that contradict this, i.e. either make benefits higher or costs lower

A is the best answer choice here because there are indeed economic losses if you do not treat hypertension. A says that untreated hypertension ---> fatal heart disease & strokes ---> economic losses not related to the medical field. So there is economic justification for treating hypertension.

B somehow supports the argument, since it contends that economies of scale would not occur should a program be instituted for the treatment of hypertension. This is actually a statement that tells us that the costs would remain the same. We are interested in a statement that says that costs will either be reduced or benefits will be increased (so that the net effect would be higher).

C is irrelevant to the argument since the argument explicitly mentions economic justifications and we should be concerned with that. I know it's the more "humane" option, but you need to put your feelings aside for the moment!

D is another option that concerns costs, specifically it mentions their increase. Again, this is contrary to what we're looking for.

E says that benefits of preventive measures < costs of preventive measures. This has a negative impact on the net effect, so E actually strengthens the argument.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical   [#permalink] 29 Apr 2017, 22:37
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 Economist: On average, the emergency treatment 13 19 Oct 2016, 21:34
8 A certain medication used to treat migraine headaches acts 7 17 Apr 2017, 11:19
2 Aggressive fertility treatments are not responsible for the 6 28 Sep 2016, 11:04
5 medical treatment 12 19 Jul 2015, 00:40
4 Economist: On average, the emergency treatment for an 10 02 Jan 2017, 15:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by