GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Jun 2018, 23:00

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Turtles and Bakers beach

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 97
Re: Turtles and Bakers beach [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2009, 01:30
My bad, I cannot put forward what I mean.
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 412
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Re: Turtles and Bakers beach [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2009, 08:51
Can we have the OA/OE pls?

Cheers,
Unplugged
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1337
Re: Turtles and Bakers beach [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2009, 09:11
Guys

The OA is B. I do not have an OE.
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1181
Re: Turtles and Bakers beach [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2009, 11:15
In such type of questions, it is very important to understand wht does the stem ask for. Here there are two negatives:
1. Environmentalists predict population will decrease as a result of spillage.
2. refutation that their prediction is wrong
we have 2 again undermine 2
Environmentalists can defend by taking a stand in B
B says female turtles come to hatch eggs after they are ten years old. That means 5 years ago, when the spillage occured they were not present. HAd they been present, the spillage would have definitely affected them. So
icandy wrote:
A major chemical spill occurred five years ago at Baker’s Beach, the world’s sole nesting
ground for Merrick sea turtles, and prevented nearly all the eggs laid that year from
hatching. Yet the number of adult female Merricks returning to lay their eggs at Baker’s
Beach has actually increased somewhat since five years ago. Clearly, environmentalists’
prediction that the world’s Merrick population would decline as a result of the spill has
proven unfounded.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument offered in
refutation of the environmentalists’ prediction?
A. The chemical spill five years ago occurred at a time when there were neither
Merrick sea turtles nor Merrick sea turtle eggs on Baker’s Beach.
B. Female Merrick sea turtles begin returning to Baker’s Beach to lay their eggs
when they are ten years old.
C. Under normal conditions, only a small proportion of hatchling female Merrick sea
Beach.
D. Environmental pressures unrelated to the chemical spill have caused a significant
decline in the population of one of the several species of sea birds that prey on
Merrick sea turtle eggs.
E. After the chemical spill, an environmental group rejected a proposal to increase
the Merrick sea turtle population by transferring eggs from Baker’s Beach to
nearby beaches that had not been affected by the spill.
VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1479
Re: Turtles and Bakers beach [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2009, 11:16
I picked B too for the following reason.

Environmentalists' prediction is that the world’s Merrick population would decline as a result of the chemical spill.

The question essentially asks which of the options supports this prediction under the condition described in the argument.

Option B says that Female Merrick lay eggs when they are 10 years old. Thus, an increase in FM returning to Baker's Beach does not damage the prediction. Instead, the prediction would come into effect another five years down the line.
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1337
Re: Turtles and Bakers beach [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2009, 14:42
ritula wrote:
In such type of questions, it is very important to understand wht does the stem ask for. Here there are two negatives:
1. Environmentalists predict population will decrease as a result of spillage.
2. refutation that their prediction is wrong
we have 2 again undermine 2
Environmentalists can defend by taking a stand in B
B says female turtles come to hatch eggs after they are ten years old. That means 5 years ago, when the spillage occured they were not present. HAd they been present, the spillage would have definitely affected them. So
]

I agree with you partly. What makes you think that there were not any 10 year old turtles 5 years ago? You seem to say that lets start at 0(the number of turtles) 10 years ago. Am I missing some thing?
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 97
Re: Turtles and Bakers beach [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2009, 23:10
OK I will try again.
I am posting similar Qs.
First one, 11-t75438 .....
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1181
Re: Turtles and Bakers beach [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2009, 23:49
Atleast we can say that not all were present. So those who came 5 years later after the spillage did contribute to the increase in population.
icandy wrote:
ritula wrote:
In such type of questions, it is very important to understand wht does the stem ask for. Here there are two negatives:
1. Environmentalists predict population will decrease as a result of spillage.
2. refutation that their prediction is wrong
we have 2 again undermine 2
Environmentalists can defend by taking a stand in B
B says female turtles come to hatch eggs after they are ten years old. That means 5 years ago, when the spillage occured they were not present. HAd they been present, the spillage would have definitely affected them. So
]

I agree with you partly. What makes you think that there were not any 10 year old turtles 5 years ago? You seem to say that lets start at 0(the number of turtles) 10 years ago. Am I missing some thing?

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Re: Turtles and Bakers beach   [#permalink] 04 Feb 2009, 23:49

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 28 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Turtles and Bakers beach

Moderator: chetan2u

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.