GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 26 Jun 2019, 15:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark

 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1525
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Two years ago officials in Bedenia implemented landmark  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2017, 13:25
see? this is one of rare questions that test takers must use the stem to find the answer. Otherwise, everybody will be tricked, and think that the question is just a normal explanation question.

Normally, there are types of question that the test takers do not need to read and pay attention to the stem. Those types are: assumption, strengthen, weaken, explanation, boldface.
Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2017
Posts: 5
Re: Two years ago officials in Bedenia implemented landmark  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2017, 04:47
msk0657 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
souvik101990 wrote:
Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities. Primarily, the legislation created new controls for preventing the entry of illegal drugs from the neighboring country of Gordenia, a major producer of marijuana. However, there has been no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities; in fact, drug use has gone up slightly in that period.

Which of the following, if true, explains how the drug legislation could have been successful despite the recent data?

A. Most of the drug problems in Bedenia’s major cities involve drugs other than marijuana.

B. Most illegal drug use in Bedenia occurs outside of the country’s major cities.

C. Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply immediately after the legislation was implemented

D. Importation of marijuana decreased from countries other than Gordenia.

E. Visits to drug treatment centers in the country’s major cities decreased dramatically following the legislation.

Premise: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities.
Premise: Primarily, the legislation created new controls for preventing the entry of illegal drugs from the neighboring country of Gordenia, a major producer of marijuana.
Conclusion: However, there has been no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities; in fact, drug use has gone up slightly in that period.

The question asks about how to strengthen that how the legislation has been successful.

Linkage: In order to strengthen the conclusion, we need to show that illegal drug use has come down via this legislation. We have paradox in the conclusion that illegal drug hasn't come down then in order to strengthen we need to show drug usage has gone up but legally then legislation has been successful..

Only C capture the essence.

A. Most of the drug problems in Bedenia’s major cities involve drugs other than marijuana...irrelevant.

B. Most illegal drug use in Bedenia occurs outside of the country’s major cities.....irrelevant.

C. Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply immediately after the legislation was implemented - Correct...

D. Importation of marijuana decreased from countries other than Gordenia.....irrelevant.

E. Visits to drug treatment centers in the country’s major cities decreased dramatically following the legislation.....irrelevant.

Not able to understand the contradicting statements - in the premise it's mentioned - " no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities"
whereas correct answer choice mentions - Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply immediately after the legislation was implemented
Intern
Joined: 25 Feb 2017
Posts: 11
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Two years ago officials in Bedenia implemented landmark  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2017, 02:35
1
souvik101990 wrote:
Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities. Primarily, the legislation created new controls for preventing the entry of illegal drugs from the neighboring country of Gordenia, a major producer of marijuana. However, there has been no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities; in fact, drug use has gone up slightly in that period.

Which of the following, if true, explains how the drug legislation could have been successful despite the recent data?

A. Most of the drug problems in Bedenia’s major cities involve drugs other than marijuana.

B. Most illegal drug use in Bedenia occurs outside of the country’s major cities.

C. Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply immediately after the legislation was implemented

D. Importation of marijuana decreased from countries other than Gordenia.

E. Visits to drug treatment centers in the country’s major cities decreased dramatically following the legislation.

Marijuana is the bone of contention as the major drug exporting country is Gordenia which exports marijuana as its major product. So the legislation will be successful in curtailing the use of drugs if it primarily concentrated on marijuana. So A is dropped.

B is out of scope as the legislation and argument is based on the drug use in major cities.

D is again out of scope
E is out of scope.

Now we need to look at the argument carefully. The legislation was implemented two years ago and the drug use has increased only in the past one year. Which means the legislation was successful for a year or soon after its implementation. So C is the apt choice.

Also the Question uses "COULD" and not "IS"...
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2016
Posts: 2
Re: Two years ago officials in Bedenia implemented landmark  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2017, 20:28
IMO A

Although the legislation was successful in reducing the illegal marijuana smuggled to Bedenia from Gordenia, the proliferation of new drugs in Bodenia might have exacerbated the drug use.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 264
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Dec 2017, 21:11
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark   [#permalink] 18 Dec 2017, 21:11

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 25 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark

 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne