It is currently 19 Sep 2017, 22:53

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 May 2014
Posts: 105

Kudos [?]: 81 [1], given: 21

Schools: YLP '18
Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2014, 00:46
1
This post received
KUDOS
22
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

29% (01:16) correct 71% (01:39) wrong based on 989 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Edit: The discussion is locked. Go HERE for further discussion


Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities. Primarily, the legislation created new controls for preventing the entry of illegal drugs from the neighboring country of Gordenia, a major producer of marijuana. However, there has been no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities; in fact, drug use has gone up slightly in that period.

Which of the following, if true, explains how the drug legislation could have been successful despite the recent data?

(A) Most of the drug problems in Bedenia’s major cities involve drugs other than marijuana.
(B) Most illegal drug use in Bedenia occurs outside of the country’s major cities.
(C) Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply immediately after the legislation was implemented
(D) Importation of marijuana decreased from countries other than Gordenia.
(E) Visits to drug treatment centers in the country’s major cities decreased dramatically following the legislation.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Why is the answer not (A)?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by broall on 28 May 2017, 21:22, edited 3 times in total.
formatted the topic

Kudos [?]: 81 [1], given: 21

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: suffer now and live forever as a champion!!!
Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Posts: 147

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 75

Location: India
Dheeraj: Madaraboina
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2014, 20:26
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I think the answer should be C.
We were given information that drug legislation was implemented in Major cities. And also However, there has been no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities;
Only option C fits here because for legislation to be successful , there has to be a decrease in illegal drugs.
"Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply immediately after the legislation was implemented."
There is difference between Major cities and cities. By implementing this Legislation in major cities , it reduced illegal drug use in cities.
By the way, option A does not address the concern of why the government is successful . Hence wrong.
Hope this helps :)

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 75

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2014
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q49 V42
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2014, 07:58
I do agree with OP, while A and C are the most legitimate choices, I don't see why I'd go with C.

I don't agree with dheeraj24's reasoning. If we're making the distinction between cities and major cities, the stem says "Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities". While the legislation happened to reduce usage in cities, it still did not fulfil it's goal of reducing usage in "major cities".

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: suffer now and live forever as a champion!!!
Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Posts: 147

Kudos [?]: 68 [2], given: 75

Location: India
Dheeraj: Madaraboina
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2014, 22:27
2
This post received
KUDOS
stoneshwar wrote:
I do agree with OP, while A and C are the most legitimate choices, I don't see why I'd go with C.

I don't agree with dheeraj24's reasoning. If we're making the distinction between cities and major cities, the stem says "Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities". While the legislation happened to reduce usage in cities, it still did not fulfil it's goal of reducing usage in "major cities".



Hi Stoneshwar,

You have well followed the premises. The only reason you have to go with option C is that the question asks
"Which of the following, if true, explains how the drug legislation could have been successful despite the recent data?"
This is a type of "Implementing a Plan" type CR question.
Here the plan was to reduce the illegal drugs .For this plan to be successful, the correct argument should say that "illegal drug use reduced/dropped significantly after implementing the plan. Only Option C does that.
Hope this reasoning helps .

Kudos [?]: 68 [2], given: 75

2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2014
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 2 [2], given: 122

Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2014, 20:02
2
This post received
KUDOS
IMO, C is a better choice than A in this question because of the keywords "could have been successful despite recent data" in the question stem. This would indicate that recent data does not fully reflect whether it was successful at one point. It's looking for something that shows it actually did accomplish what it was meant to do...even if it didn't last.

Answer choice A doesn't explain how the plan was ever successful. It only explains why it wasn't. Marijuana usage isn't really the problem. It's part of the larger issue at hand, which is illegal drug usage.

Kudos [?]: 2 [2], given: 122

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2014
Posts: 72

Kudos [?]: 25 [2], given: 79

Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2014, 21:01
2
This post received
KUDOS
The answer Should be C.
As per the premise the legislation was brought into effect two years ago. And Option C sates that there was a dramatic decrease in illegal drug use. This information makes the plan successful.
The premise further states that over the last year there has been no decrease in illegal drug use. So it is reasonable to infer that some other factor has been responsible for rise in drug use.
_________________

______________________________
Liked the Post !!!! KUDOs Plzzzzz

Kudos [?]: 25 [2], given: 79

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2015
Posts: 50

Kudos [?]: 21 [1], given: 76

Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2015, 08:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
the legislation created new controls for preventing the entry of illegal drugs from the neighboring country of Gordenia- So in order for the legislation to be successful i.e the answer has to strengthen the outcome that drug entry was decreased and doesn't need to focus on the total increase or decrease in drug rate. A doesn't provide an alternate solution to the cause of increase in the drug rate but doesnt provide anything solid to strengthen the success of the legislation
Still i feel A is a better answer than C.
_________________

Kudos if it helped you in any way

Kudos [?]: 21 [1], given: 76

1 KUDOS received
Math Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1272

Kudos [?]: 2239 [1], given: 178

Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2015, 09:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
PathFinder007 wrote:
PathFinder007 wrote:
qwerty12321 wrote:
Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities. Primarily, the legislation created new controls for preventing the entry of illegal drugs from the neighboring country of Gordenia, a major producer of marijuana. However, there has been no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities; in fact, drug use has gone up slightly in that period.

Which of the following, if true, explains how the drug legislation could have been successful despite the recent data?

(A)Most of the drug problems in Bedenia’s major cities involve drugs other than marijuana.
(B)Most illegal drug use in Bedenia occurs outside of the country’s major cities.
(C)Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply immediately after the legislation was implemented
(D)Importation of marijuana decreased from countries other than Gordenia.
(E)Visits to drug treatment centers in the country’s major cities decreased dramatically following the legislation.

Why is the answer not (A)?


mikemcgarry

could you please provide your comments on this. what is the issue with A? and How C can be ans.? I found A is better then C.

Thanks.


hi mikemcgarry

could you please provide your comments.

Thanks

Hello PathFinder007

Answer A can't be correct because legislation was planned to fight all drugs, not only marijuana.

Argument says that legislation was implemented two years ago and no major decrease was present during last year.
What if in the first year after legislation, combat with drugs was super successfull and drug turnover decrease on 60% and in the next year results was not so impressive for any reasons?
Then according to two years observation we will have 60% derease and according to last year observation we will have 0% decrease.

That's why C is correct.
_________________

Simple way to always control time during the quant part.
How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC.
660 (Q48, V33) - unpleasant surprise
740 (Q50, V40, IR3) - anti-debrief ;)

Kudos [?]: 2239 [1], given: 178

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2015
Posts: 149

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 37

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2015, 11:32
C is better. A states that most of the drugs were not marijuana.However the ban wa on all illegal drugs and not only a marijuana. Note that a major "marijuana producer" is a modifier that modifies gordenia. Nowhere is it mentioned that marijuana was banned. So c strengthens the conclusion

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 37

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Feb 2016, 03:38
Which of the following, if true, explains how the drug legislation could have been successful despite the recent data?
The question means that Even " there has been no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities; in fact, drug use has gone up slightly in that period." Which one still show that the legislation was successful.

Choice A "Most of the drug problems in Bedenia’s major cities involve drugs other than marijuana." is incorrect since other drugs were used replaced to marijuana. It means that the legislation just prevent using marijuana but other drugs are used more.

Choice C is correct because "Immediately after the legislation was implemented, Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply" It means the legislation is successful - and the rest of the year, It could have others reasons leading to the increase using of illegal drugs.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Jamboree GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Status: GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 285

Kudos [?]: 309 [2], given: 1

Location: India
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Feb 2016, 05:31
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
It is stated in the argument that "Gordenia" is a major producer of "marijuana" but that does not indicate other drugs are not produced.Besides the drug legislation has been implemented to combat illegal drug use which includes all drugs. Hence "A" does not explain why the problem has not been curbed. Even if the drug problems in "Bedenia" includes other drugs the use should have reduced after the implementation of the legislation.
_________________

Aryama Dutta Saikia
Jamboree Education Pvt. Ltd.

Kudos [?]: 309 [2], given: 1

VP
VP
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1208

Kudos [?]: 836 [0], given: 75

Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2016, 00:06
Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities. Primarily, the legislation created new controls for preventing the entry of illegal drugs from the neighboring country of Gordenia, a major producer of marijuana. However, there has been no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities; in fact, drug use has gone up slightly in that period.

Which of the following, if true, explains how the drug legislation could have been successful despite the recent data?

(A)Most of the drug problems in Bedenia’s major cities involve drugs other than marijuana..............we are concerned with all the drugs. not one more than other. This indicates no success.

(B)Most illegal drug use in Bedenia occurs outside of the country’s major cities...................Out of scope. We are concerned only major cities here

(C)Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply immediately after the legislation was implemented..........This indicates some success.

(D)Importation of marijuana decreased from countries other than Gordenia.............Does not relate to the legislation success.

(E)Visits to drug treatment centers in the country’s major cities decreased dramatically following the legislation.............visits decreses does not mean problems are less, it can mean people who got addicted do not want to get rid of it as well.
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773
https://gmatclub.com/forum/improve-reading-habit-233410.html#p1802265

Kudos [?]: 836 [0], given: 75

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Sep 2015
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 37

Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Mar 2017, 01:48
AryamaDuttaSaikia wrote:
It is stated in the argument that "Gordenia" is a major producer of "marijuana" but that does not indicate other drugs are not produced.Besides the drug legislation has been implemented to combat illegal drug use which includes all drugs. Hence "A" does not explain why the problem has not been curbed. Even if the drug problems in "Bedenia" includes other drugs the use should have reduced after the implementation of the legislation.


Hello Aryama,

Thanks for explanation.
I have a query. What about option E ? Option E in a way supports drug legislation, on what grounds did we eliminate option E. i was stuck between C & E.

Thanks
Amaresh

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 37

BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
P
Status: Aiming MBA
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 2341

Kudos [?]: 706 [0], given: 62

Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, Technology
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.65
WE: Information Technology (Health Care)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Mar 2017, 10:18
amargad0391 wrote:
AryamaDuttaSaikia wrote:
It is stated in the argument that "Gordenia" is a major producer of "marijuana" but that does not indicate other drugs are not produced.Besides the drug legislation has been implemented to combat illegal drug use which includes all drugs. Hence "A" does not explain why the problem has not been curbed. Even if the drug problems in "Bedenia" includes other drugs the use should have reduced after the implementation of the legislation.


Hello Aryama,

Thanks for explanation.
I have a query. What about option E ? Option E in a way supports drug legislation, on what grounds did we eliminate option E. i was stuck between C & E.

Thanks
Amaresh


Please read the answer to your query very well explained here:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/two-years-ag ... l#p1706778

If I am not visiting a doctor, that doesn't mean I am well. May be I don't want to visit anymore. Or I am addicted now. :)
_________________

V21 ---> V40!

Kudos [?]: 706 [0], given: 62

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 479

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 18

Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Mar 2017, 10:21
Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities. Primarily, the legislation created new controls for preventing the entry of illegal drugs from the neighboring country of Gordenia, a major producer of marijuana. However, there has been no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities; in fact, drug use has gone up slightly in that period.

Which of the following, if true, explains how the drug legislation could have been successful despite the recent data?

(A)Most of the drug problems in Bedenia’s major cities involve drugs other than marijuana.
(B)Most illegal drug use in Bedenia occurs outside of the country’s major cities.

(C)Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply immediately after the legislation was implemented
(D)Importation of marijuana decreased from countries other than Gordenia.
(E)Visits to drug treatment centers in the country’s major cities decreased dramatically following the legislation.

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 18

Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark   [#permalink] 22 Mar 2017, 10:21
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
20 Two years ago, the government of Runagia increased by 20 maybeam 5 28 Oct 2015, 13:25
14 Two years ago, the cost of the raw material used in a eladshus 6 28 Apr 2016, 08:21
16 Two years ago, the cost of the raw material used in a skim 14 09 Mar 2017, 13:47
52 In the country of Bedenia, officials have recently thelosthippie 21 14 Sep 2016, 10:28
10 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Two years ago officials in Bedenia implemented landmark souvik101990 9 07 Sep 2017, 20:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.