adkikani wrote:
generis Quote:
Two years ago, Sam put $1,000 into a savings account. At the end of the first year, his account had accrued $100 in interest bringing his total balance to $1,100. The next year, his account balance increased by 10%. At the end of the two years, by what percent has Sam's account balance increased from his initial deposit of $1,000 ?
A. 19%
B. 20%
C. 21%
D. 22%
E. 25%
Quote:
Year 1 interest: $100
Year 2 interest, 10% of 1,100 = $110
Total interest = 100 + 110 = $210 (which equals the change in value)
\(\frac{change}{original}\) x 100 = percent change
\(\frac{210}{1000}\) = .21 x 100 = 21%
Answer C
We are not given rate of interest (r) directly. Did you calculate the same by knowing principal amount (Rs.1000),
tenure (1 year), interest (Rs. 100) and using equation: Interest = PrT/100 for the first year and then using the same for the second year?
niks18 Is the highlighted part in question required to be given?
adkikani , I think you ask two questions.
1) did I use simple interest rate equation?
2) why does it look as if I did?
•
No, I did not use interest rateI used net change in money
amount for each year
Year 1's change
amount is given: + $100
Year 2's change
rate is given:
10% increase on $1,100 = + $110
Then I calculated percent change from net amount change,
see original post. (Change/Original * 100)
Your question about the highlighted portion
is interesting.
If Sam left the earned interest in the bank;
and if Sam left the account alone;
of course we can calculate the
amount in the account.
He put in $1000. He earned $100. His total = $1,100.
But we don't know what Sam did with the account.
The highlighted portion tells us that he left it alone.
• I suspect it appears that I used interest rates
because for
any given
first year,
if simple interest rate = annual compound interest rate,
amount yielded is identical.
•
Use interest rate? Yes, but . . .If I were to calculate percent increase
using interest rates,
I would: 1) not use strict SI (it's inaccurate)*
2) use multipliers or
3) use compound annual interestFor #2 and #3, I would omit principal amount. Not needed.
Percent change using
multipliers= compound interest rate
•
Multipliers - TOTAL factor increaseMultiplier, Year 1? Deduce from base + interest
\(1,000 + 100 = 1,100\)Multiplier:
\(\frac{1,100}{1,000}= 1.1\)Multiplier for Year 2? Given.
10% increase on extant amount =
\(1.1\)Multipliers: TOTAL increase factor?
(Year 1 multiplier * Year 2 multiplier) = total increase factor
Total increase factor:
\((1.1 * 1.1) = 1.21\)Original base?
\(1\)•
Compound annual interest: TOTAL factor increase \(A_{final}=P(1+.10)^{nt}\)
\(A_{final}=P(1.1)^{1*2}\)
\(A_{final}=P(1.1)^2\)
\(A_{final}=1.21P\)
\(A_{original}= P\) •
Percent increase: \(\frac{New-Old}{Old}*100\)
\((\frac{1.21-1}{1}*100)=(\frac{.21}{1}*100)\)
\(= .21*100=21\) percent
OR
\((\frac{1.21P-1P}{1P}*100)=(\frac{.21P}{1P}*100)\)
\(=.21*100=21\) percent
Hope that answers your question.
*SI amount for both years?
INCORRECT if years are taken together
Run this formula for SI:
\(A_{final} = P(1 + rt)\)
Total after two years is $1,200. Not correct.
If you separate Year 1 and Year 2;
change \(P\) from $1,000 to $1,100;
and change \(t\) from 2 to 1;
SI formula will work.