GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 23 May 2018, 06:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1262
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2015, 10:58
1
This post received
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

61% (01:39) correct 39% (01:58) wrong based on 448 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's Technologies had 175 sexual harassment cases open, a number that at that time led all companies in the sector. At that time, a typical claim took six months to process and clear. In response to this high number, the CEO's Advisory Team published a comprehensive set of guidelines for training employees in the identification and avoidance of behaviors that could constitute sexual harassment. At this writing, the human resources department has only sixty sexual harassment cases open. Clearly, the guidelines published by the CEO's Advisory Team were effective in reducing the occurrence of new sexual harassment claims at Harrison's Technologies.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?

A) Two of the six members of the CEO's Advisory Team were found guilty of sexually harassing members of the secretarial staff
B) New paperwork and procedure, also introduced two years ago, has allowed the human resources department at Harrison's Technologies to process and close almost all new claims of sexual harassment in less than one month.
C) The human resources department at Anthony Information Industries, a principal rival of Harrison's with a similar number of employees, opened no new sexual harassment claims in the past year.
D) Independent consultants using scientifically designed surveys have found that the majority of current employees at Harrison's Technologies are not properly educated on exactly what behaviors constitute sexual harassment.
E) The majority of sexual harassment claims lead to the termination of employees found guilty; new employees hired to fill these positions need to be trained in the guidelines.

_________________

Simple way to always control time during the quant part.
How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC.
660 (Q48, V33) - unpleasant surprise
740 (Q50, V40, IR3) - anti-debrief ;)

Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1175
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2015, 14:56
[quote="Harley1980"]Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's Technologies had 175 sexual harassment cases open, a number that at that time led all companies in the sector. At that time, a typical claim took six months to process and clear. In response to this high number, the CEO's Advisory Team published a comprehensive set of guidelines for training employees in the identification and avoidance of behaviors that could constitute sexual harassment. At this writing, the human resources department has only sixty sexual harassment cases open. Clearly, the guidelines published by the CEO's Advisory Team were effective in reducing the occurrence of new sexual harassment claims at Harrison's Technologies.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?

A) Two of the six members of the CEO's Advisory Team were found guilty of sexually harassing members of the secretarial staff
This explains nothing regarding the guidelines-out of scope

B) New paperwork and procedure, also introduced two years ago, has allowed the human resources department at Harrison's Technologies to process and close almost all new claims of sexual harassment in less than one month.
(something causes the result.Weakener)

C) The human resources department at Anthony Information Industries, a principal rival of Harrison's with a similar number of employees, opened no new sexual harassment claims in the past year.(Out of scope. This explains reg other Industry)

D) Independent consultants using scientifically designed surveys have found that the majority of current employees at Harrison's Technologies are not properly educated on exactly what behaviors constitute sexual harassment.(This either strengthens or weakens the claim as they may miss to file a claim or false claim)

E) The majority of sexual harassment claims lead to the termination of employees found guilty; new employees hired to fill these positions need to be trained in the guidelines.(This explains the after procedure of investigation for guilty accused persons. This explains nothing regarding the guidelines-out of scope.)

Confused and selected D :?
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773
https://gmatclub.com/forum/improve-reading-habit-233410.html#p1802265

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Posts: 51
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2015, 15:27
Mechmeera wrote:
Harley1980 wrote:
Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's Technologies had 175 sexual harassment cases open, a number that at that time led all companies in the sector. At that time, a typical claim took six months to process and clear. In response to this high number, the CEO's Advisory Team published a comprehensive set of guidelines for training employees in the identification and avoidance of behaviors that could constitute sexual harassment. At this writing, the human resources department has only sixty sexual harassment cases open. Clearly, the guidelines published by the CEO's Advisory Team were effective in reducing the occurrence of new sexual harassment claims at Harrison's Technologies.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?

A) Two of the six members of the CEO's Advisory Team were found guilty of sexually harassing members of the secretarial staff
This explains nothing regarding the guidelines-out of scope

B) New paperwork and procedure, also introduced two years ago, has allowed the human resources department at Harrison's Technologies to process and close almost all new claims of sexual harassment in less than one month.
(something causes the result.Weakener)

C) The human resources department at Anthony Information Industries, a principal rival of Harrison's with a similar number of employees, opened no new sexual harassment claims in the past year.(Out of scope. This explains reg other Industry)

D) Independent consultants using scientifically designed surveys have found that the majority of current employees at Harrison's Technologies are not properly educated on exactly what behaviors constitute sexual harassment.(This either strengthens or weakens the claim as they may miss to file a claim or false claim)

E) The majority of sexual harassment claims lead to the termination of employees found guilty; new employees hired to fill these positions need to be trained in the guidelines.(This explains the after procedure of investigation for guilty accused persons. This explains nothing regarding the guidelines-out of scope.)

Confused and selected D :?


Hi,

Clearly the confusion is between B & D.One important point to note is the focus is on the time taken to close a case(or reduce the no. of pending cases) and never
on the number of cases raised.So in this case B weakens the argument by saying that the new procedure to close the cases resulting in less number of pending cases.
In option D even if the employees hadnt learned anyhthing new or if they have leaned new things,the cases could have increased/decreased but thats not the point
thats important.It could still have the same number of pending cases or even increased but you will never know as you didnt have that previous number to make the comparison.
Hope this helps and I havent confused you ;-)
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1175
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2015, 03:05
iikarthik wrote:
Hi,

Clearly the confusion is between B & D.One important point to note is the focus is on the time taken to close a case(or reduce the no. of pending cases) and never on the number of cases raised.So in this case B weakens the argument by saying that the new procedure to close the cases resulting in less number of pending cases.

In option D even if the employees hadnt learned anyhthing new or if they have leaned new things,the cases could have increased/decreased but thats not the point thats important.It could still have the same number of pending cases or even increased but you will never know as you didnt have that previous number to make the comparison.
Hope this helps and I havent confused you ;-)
I'm not able agree to your explanation reg D.

The conclusion says
Quote:
Clearly, the guidelines were effective in reducing the occurrence of new sexual harassment claims at Harrison's Technologies

It is clear that cases have reduced and
conclusion says thay guidelines are the ones responsible for it.

I feel there is no case of comparison :|
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773
https://gmatclub.com/forum/improve-reading-habit-233410.html#p1802265

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Posts: 51
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2015, 11:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
Mechmeera wrote:
iikarthik wrote:
Hi,

Clearly the confusion is between B & D.One important point to note is the focus is on the time taken to close a case(or reduce the no. of pending cases) and never on the number of cases raised.So in this case B weakens the argument by saying that the new procedure to close the cases resulting in less number of pending cases.

In option D even if the employees hadnt learned anyhthing new or if they have leaned new things,the cases could have increased/decreased but thats not the point thats important.It could still have the same number of pending cases or even increased but you will never know as you didnt have that previous number to make the comparison.
Hope this helps and I havent confused you ;-)
I'm not able agree to your explanation reg D.

The conclusion says
Quote:
Clearly, the guidelines were effective in reducing the occurrence of new sexual harassment claims at Harrison's Technologies

It is clear that cases have reduced and
conclusion says thay guidelines are the ones responsible for it.

I feel there is no case of comparison :|


Correct,the conclusion says that guidelines are the ones responsible for it(not the reduction in cases but only the reduction is open cases).our job is to weaken the conclusion.Do note that reduction in number of open cases doesnt necessarily mean that the guidelines were effective and people have changed.The conclusion would have been stronger had they mentioned that the number of cases filed have also reduced.Also,the conclusion never says explicitly that the behavior changed only due to training.The conclusion is based on the only fact that the number of open cases were less after the guidelines were introduced.What if there was another cause that led to the reduction in not the total number of cases filed but only in the number of open cases.If we could provide an alternate reason for the reduced number of open cases(upon which the conclusion is based) it automatically weakens the conclusion.The alternate reason here for the reduction in the number of open cases is that the procedure for closing the cases got simplified and coincidentally,the change in process happened at the same time when the guidelines were issued.Hope this helps
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1904
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2017, 03:10
Normally, in gmat, the argument (typically for assumption, strengthen, weaken questions) has a clear structure. In other words, the main premise has an obvious reason to support the main conclusion. Sometimes, the main conclusion and the main premise of the argument may mislead the test takers because the meaning may not fit the passage; in those cases, test takers should check the question stem.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Jul 2017
Posts: 15
Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 09 Sep 2017, 20:42
Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's Technologies had 175 sexual harassment cases open, a number that at that time led all companies in the sector. At that time, a typical claim took six months to process and clear. In response to this high number, the CEO's Advisory Team published a comprehensive set of guidelines for training employees in the identification and avoidance of behaviors that could constitute sexual harassment. At this writing, the human resources department has only sixty sexual harassment cases open. Clearly, the guidelines published by the CEO's Advisory Team were effective in reducing the occurrence of new sexual harassment claims at Harrison's Technologies.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
A Two of the six members of the CEO's Advisory Team were found guilty of sexually harassing members of the secretarial staff
B New paperwork and procedure, also introduced two years ago, has allowed the human resources department at Harrison's Technologies to process and close almost all new claims of sexual harassment in less than one month.
C The human resources department at Anthony Information Industries, a principal rival of Harrison's with a similar number of employees, opened no new sexual harassment claims in the past year.
D Independent consultants using scientifically designed surveys have found that the majority of current employees at Harrison's Technologies are not properly educated on exactly what behaviors constitute sexual harassment.
E The majority of sexual harassment claims lead to the termination of employees found guilty; new employees hired to fill these positions need to be trained in the guidelines.

Why D is incorrect?

Originally posted by katelyntanglu on 09 Sep 2017, 15:42.
Last edited by broall on 09 Sep 2017, 20:42, edited 1 time in total.
Merged topic. Please search before posting question.
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1904
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jan 2018, 21:52
OE:

The credited answer is (B). If the time to process these claims went down from six months to one month, this means that, even if the number of new claims remained constant, approximately 1/6 as many claims should be open at any one time. In fact, 60 is considerably more than one sixth of 175, so this suggests that perhaps the number of new claims has increase --- directly opposing the conclusion. This is a very effective weakener.
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1904
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jan 2018, 21:53
katelyntanglu wrote:
Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's Technologies had 175 sexual harassment cases open, a number that at that time led all companies in the sector. At that time, a typical claim took six months to process and clear. In response to this high number, the CEO's Advisory Team published a comprehensive set of guidelines for training employees in the identification and avoidance of behaviors that could constitute sexual harassment. At this writing, the human resources department has only sixty sexual harassment cases open. Clearly, the guidelines published by the CEO's Advisory Team were effective in reducing the occurrence of new sexual harassment claims at Harrison's Technologies.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
A Two of the six members of the CEO's Advisory Team were found guilty of sexually harassing members of the secretarial staff
B New paperwork and procedure, also introduced two years ago, has allowed the human resources department at Harrison's Technologies to process and close almost all new claims of sexual harassment in less than one month.
C The human resources department at Anthony Information Industries, a principal rival of Harrison's with a similar number of employees, opened no new sexual harassment claims in the past year.
D Independent consultants using scientifically designed surveys have found that the majority of current employees at Harrison's Technologies are not properly educated on exactly what behaviors constitute sexual harassment.
E The majority of sexual harassment claims lead to the termination of employees found guilty; new employees hired to fill these positions need to be trained in the guidelines.

Why D is incorrect?


OE:
If the employees at Harrison's Technologies are not clear on precisely what behaviors constitute sexual harassment, that could suggest a rise in claims, and it would seem that the guidelines didn't educate them properly. Then again, what if their confusion is such that they classify many more behaviors as sexual harassment than legally they should? In that case, the employees might think almost anything constitutes sexual harassment, so they would be super-careful and afraid to do anything, and there would be fewer claims. And how did the guidelines affect their understanding? If the guidelines were much stricter than the law, then it would encourage this kind of super-careful behavior in employees, producing the kind of incorrect understanding that actually would reduce claims. We could interpret this either way, so it's not a clear weakener. Choice (D) is incorrect.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Jan 2018
Posts: 5
Re: Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2018, 11:32
@mechmeera ,
Thanks for the explanation but isn’t it clearly written in last sentence of the question that new guildlines were helpful in reducing the occurrence of new harassment cases . That means less new cases were reported to HR.

But sentence B is talking about the closing the claims which were already reported to HR.
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 181
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
CAT Tests
Re: Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2018, 13:51
Could anyone please help me explain why option B is incorrect? I am still unable to understand the true logic behind that option.
VP
VP
User avatar
P
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1145
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
CAT Tests
Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Feb 2018, 08:13
csaluja wrote:
Could anyone please help me explain why option B is incorrect? I am still unable to understand the true logic behind that option.

Hi friend ,
B is the correct answer .
Can you please elaborate what did you not understand ?
I will try to explain .
_________________

Please give kudos if you found my answers useful

Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's   [#permalink] 07 Feb 2018, 08:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Two years ago, the human resources department at Harrison's

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.