It is currently 11 Dec 2017, 21:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 15971

Kudos [?]: 29348 [0], given: 5292

Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2009, 22:55
I believe that timing in general does not matter with one exception several alluded to: it may ding you for answering too quickly (within a few seconds) since in that case you are just guessing.
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

Just starting out with GMAT? Start here... or use our Daily Study Plan

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

Kudos [?]: 29348 [0], given: 5292

Manager
Joined: 24 Apr 2009
Posts: 91

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 2

Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2009, 02:22
Guys i don't think that the prep software and actual exam algorithms are exactly same..
i've heard, so many people saying that what they observed on the prep was not completely same or true in the actual test..
In actual test, they got very diff. results from the strategies they "assumed" or followed by experimenting with gmatprep..with same difficulty questions..

So, i would rather focus on the concepts..

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 04 Jul 2009
Posts: 31

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 7

Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2009, 03:08
bsd_lover wrote:
Yup, I was at it again today. Next set of experiments :
3. What is the importance of the last 17 questions?
Experiment : If I get the 1st 20 correct and mess up the last 17 what will happen ?
Methodology : Kick butt in the 1st 20 and guess the last 17
Results : Q49 with 12 wrong overall.
Analysis: Whoa !!! 49 ? with the same number wrong as the 1st experiment ... By Question 20 I had received all the tough quant concept questions that I could have ever hoped for. However, I wasn't expecting a score as high as 49. Although that might be because I got a few guesses on the last 17 right. Even so I'm sure I'd have received 46 or above here. Goes to underscore the importance of those first 10 questions compared to the last few.

4. What is the importance of CR in Verbal ?
Experiment : If I get all the CRs correct and mess up everything else what will happen ?
Methodology : Kick butt in all the CRs and guess everything else
Results : V13 with 29 wrong overall.
Analysis: I think I've busted my own myth that CR is more important than SC in some way. This doesn't seem to be the case. I got 11/11 CRs correct and still could not achieve more than 13. The CRs were different to the ones I usually get (at 40+ level). I encountered 4 of these CRs in the 1st 10 questions.

Superb analysis. It has broken one of my greatest myth. Thanks a lot bsd.
_________________

Work hardest to get what you like
Otherwise you will be forced to like what you get
I am out for killing again. Getting started again.
I give what you want, You give me what I want.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 7

Director
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 539

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 92

WE 1: Investment Banking - 6yrs
Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2009, 11:13
robertrdzak wrote:
I thought I would add a unique expereince with GMAT Prep.

I took the GMATPrep2 yesterday and scored 3 wrong (all in a row) in the first 10. Questions 8, 9 and 10 to be specific. I then scored another 3 wrong on the next 10 questions and 1 wrong in the last 17.

Questions.............# Wrong
1-10.........................3
11-20.......................3
21-37.......................1

Overal Quant score: 50

I really do not think the first 10 or even 20 are as heavily weighted as most people think. MGMAT seems to follow this belief as well.

The wrong answers could be experimental questions, so Q50 is possible.

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 92

Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Posts: 101

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 10

Schools: HBS, Stanford, Haas, Booth, Columbia
Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2009, 03:32
I missed 9 Quant on the GMATPrep Test. Got first 13 correct and then missed questions evenly for next 23. They were tough. First, time taking test. I got a 50Q. Just thought I would put up my 2 cents. I am a strong believer that first 10 matter most.

Also, missed 9 in V and got a 41. Then, (on different software) missed first 2 and only 4 total and got a 39V!

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 10

Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 15971

Kudos [?]: 29348 [0], given: 5292

Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2009, 16:17
aj1545 wrote:
I missed 9 Quant on the GMATPrep Test. Got first 13 correct and then missed questions evenly for next 23. They were tough. First, time taking test. I got a 50Q. Just thought I would put up my 2 cents. I am a strong believer that first 10 matter most.

Also, missed 9 in V and got a 41. Then, (on different software) missed first 2 and only 4 total and got a 39V!

Fantastic GMAT Score - must be 750?
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

Just starting out with GMAT? Start here... or use our Daily Study Plan

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

Kudos [?]: 29348 [0], given: 5292

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2009
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2009, 00:32
Nice experiment!!!!

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Posts: 101

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 10

Schools: HBS, Stanford, Haas, Booth, Columbia
Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2009, 16:04
bb wrote:

Fantastic GMAT Score - must be 750?

I got a 730 actually on the GMATprep. I have yet to take the second one and I am saving it for the week before my test (Oct. 10).

I have taken Kaplan twice and got 710 & 760. Manhattan = 730. Princeton = 710. I have traditionally performed well on test day so I am hoping that I get 700+. I think that my app will speak for itself as long as I can get in the game.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 10

Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2009
Posts: 13

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2009, 23:30
Great experiment... Keep going..

I got a 46 in quant with 16 mistakes and 44 in quant with just 11 mistakes.
when i got a 44 i got a series of 3 questions wrong and when i got 46, my mistakes were spread. My guess is that mistakes done continously cost more.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Posts: 376

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 4

WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2009, 06:43
The test must be finished at all costs.
Don't ever get a "bad" streak of answering two or more wrong in a row.

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 4

Intern
Joined: 28 Nov 2009
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 5

Location: Earth

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2009, 09:37
Hi,

I was wondering what your thoughts were on repeats with the GMAT Prep. I did the test 3 times now and I did achieve my all time highest in both areas (Q 47, V 31 - 630). On one hand, I am happy for the score gain/increase. On the other, I feel its just because I have seen repeat questions, predominantly in RC CR and PS. I did get my first Permutation question right (first time in my test taking experiences). Also, managed my time more effectively and cut my losses - wasn't as stubborn (feel that I can still improve on this). So, I will assume that given that I have seen some questions my true ability is like a 550? Is that a correct way to think about it?

Also, I have this "adaptive feeling" about the test... can anyone comment on this scenario?
First 5 questions - I get a Work problem wrong (quite simple, not THAT bad)
20 questions later - I get another work problem
towards end of exam - I get another work problem.

Essentially, I feel that that if I get wrong one type (work problem in this scenario) of question, I will probably see a harder one in the future of the test. I dont know if its me going crazy though...

Thanks for your time and thoughts.

All the best,
Jas

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 237

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2009, 23:24
aj1545 wrote:
bb wrote:

Fantastic GMAT Score - must be 750?

I got a 730 actually on the GMATprep. I have yet to take the second one and I am saving it for the week before my test (Oct. 10).

I have taken Kaplan twice and got 710 & 760. Manhattan = 730. Princeton = 710. I have traditionally performed well on test day so I am hoping that I get 700+. I think that my app will speak for itself as long as I can get in the game.

My exp with MGMAT CAT is different. In Q, I did not have a very long chain of corrects (the longest was 5). But the test kept feeding me 700+ questions since Q#4 onwards (and never fed me 500-600 level question).
In V, even after getting several wrong in the first 10, I had 9-correct-answer-long chain in Q#20-30 range and by that time I started seeing 700+ again. If their cAT algorithm is the same as gmac, then, the first few questions being very important may not hold true and one can recoup the losses by getting a long-correct-answer chain even after the first 10.
_________________

-----------------------
tusharvk

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 214

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 6

Just how much overlap on GMATPrep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2009, 18:23
I read timetrader's post on the GMATPrep and he said that it can be take one or two extra times for practice, but there might be some overlap. I was wondering just how much over lap is there if you take both tests again for the second time and for the third time. I took the first exam before I started studying to estimate how much work I'll have to do. Now I've studied for a couple of months, and would really like to see how much I've improved and how much more work I'll have to do. However, I would like to save a test to do a week before the test. If I do the second test now and uninstall the software and then reinstall, can I do both tests over again without seeing more than 10% overlap?

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 6

VP
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1466

Kudos [?]: 311 [0], given: 31

Re: Just how much overlap on GMATPrep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2009, 18:42
11MBA wrote:
I read timetrader's post on the GMATPrep and he said that it can be take one or two extra times for practice, but there might be some overlap. I was wondering just how much over lap is there if you take both tests again for the second time and for the third time. I took the first exam before I started studying to estimate how much work I'll have to do. Now I've studied for a couple of months, and would really like to see how much I've improved and how much more work I'll have to do. However, I would like to save a test to do a week before the test. If I do the second test now and uninstall the software and then reinstall, can I do both tests over again without seeing more than 10% overlap?

installing and reinstalling won't do anything..the program is stored in your registry..you would have to find a way to delete from the registry

Kudos [?]: 311 [0], given: 31

VP
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1466

Kudos [?]: 311 [0], given: 31

Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2009, 18:50
Best thing to do is the take an exam and don't review what you got wrong/right. You can review what you got wrong, as far as question number, but don't review the answers.

Kudos [?]: 311 [0], given: 31

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 214

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 6

Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2009, 14:00
Is there a lot of overlap, when the two tests are taken for the second time?

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 56

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2009, 04:34
What I read on this and other forums, you can take test 3-4 times easily without much overlap (i.e. 4-5 questions). GPrep has good amount of questions.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

Intern
Joined: 09 Jan 2010
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2010, 02:25
In general, I have notified an obvious correlation of getting a substantially higher score the less goofy I am on the first 9 questions.

The myth seems somewhat logical to me if I bring it into real life perspective. Although I know the logic and coding behind GMAC's software for determination of assessment, I think its somewhat common sense that initial assessments carry more weight rather than fine tuning one's ability past the first 1/4 to 1/5 of each respective section. Meaning the if then statements (obviously probably much more complicated in reality) matter more initially because thats a relative of how fast you can rise or fall in a mere few questions in the beginning. Kind like the phrase

initial impressions most?

Out of curiosity have any of you tinkered with the myth of the initial 5 or 8 or 10 questions on the GMAT Focus CATs? (Been hearing those are 2nd to none for Quant prep.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2010
Posts: 131

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2010, 22:23
wow what an analysis
_________________

Regards
Ganesh
Class of 2012
Great Lakes Institute of Management
http://greatlakes.edu.in

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Intern
Joined: 10 Nov 2009
Posts: 39

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 3

Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2010, 05:51
very interesting analysis

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 3

Re: (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep   [#permalink] 30 Jan 2010, 05:51

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6    Next  [ 115 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# (Un) Scientific analysis of gmatprep

Moderator: HKD1710

 HOT DEALS FOR NOVEMBER Economist GMAT - Free Free 1-week trial + Free Test Kaplan Courses - Save \$475 \$225 Discount + \$250 Bonus Target Test Prep - \$800 \$50 Discount + \$750 Bonus [GMAT ClubTests and Premium MBA Bundle] EMPOWERgmat - \$99/mo GMAT Club tests included 2nd month GMAT Club Tests - Free Included with every course purchaseof \$149 or more - Full List is here

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.