It is currently 14 Dec 2017, 00:32

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Under a provision of the Constitution that was never

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1339

Kudos [?]: 877 [1], given: 10

Reviews Badge
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2008, 10:45
1
This post received
KUDOS
13
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

82% (01:07) correct 18% (01:19) wrong based on 915 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Edit: This discussion has retired. Find the new thread HERE


Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.

A. was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

B. was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

C. was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

D. has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

E. has never been applied, Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Why E is better than D?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by HKD1710 on 25 Oct 2017, 19:55, edited 3 times in total.
underlined

Kudos [?]: 877 [1], given: 10

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 272

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2008, 10:54
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
goalsnr wrote:
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.

A. was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

B. was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

C. was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

D. has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

E. has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

Why E is better than D?


Ok a disclaimer at the outset ..i m no expert at it but here is my line of reasoning as to why E is better than D

If we see carefully, the only difference between D and E is usage of 'whereby' ...if we go back to the concept of 3Cs as per Manhattan we would not want to pick up D because E is a more [u]succinit [/u]choice as compared to D

I hope this helps
_________________

The world is continuous, but the mind is discrete

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 264

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2008, 11:05
Just another rule, place the modifies as close as possible to the clause that modifies it. Hence D. Whereby is just redundent here.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 453 [0], given: 1

Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2008, 11:06
where by is clearly redundant. If you ask the Q Under a provision of the Constitution that has never been applied, it should modify congress and not the situation/time congress is in.

E stands out better than D

Kudos [?]: 453 [0], given: 1

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1339

Kudos [?]: 877 [0], given: 10

Reviews Badge
Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2008, 15:16
vdhawan1 wrote:
goalsnr wrote:
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.

A. was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

B. was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

C. was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

D. has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

E. has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

Why E is better than D?


Ok a disclaimer at the outset ..i m no expert at it but here is my line of reasoning as to why E is better than D

If we see carefully, the only difference between D and E is usage of 'whereby' ...if we go back to the concept of 3Cs as per Manhattan we would not want to pick up D because E is a more [u]succinit [/u]choice as compared to D

I hope this helps


I would agree with your explanation if there were no "." after "applied in answer choice E.
The source of this SC is GMATTer.May be its a typo :(

Kudos [?]: 877 [0], given: 10

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 264

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2008, 15:37
goalsnr wrote:
vdhawan1 wrote:
goalsnr wrote:
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.

A. was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

B. was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

C. was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

D. has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

E. has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

Why E is better than D?


Ok a disclaimer at the outset ..i m no expert at it but here is my line of reasoning as to why E is better than D

If we see carefully, the only difference between D and E is usage of 'whereby' ...if we go back to the concept of 3Cs as per Manhattan we would not want to pick up D because E is a more [u]succinit [/u]choice as compared to D

I hope this helps


I would agree with your explanation if there were no "." after "applied in answer choice E.
The source of this SC is GMATTer.May be its a typo :(


Lol yes...my eyes failed to notice the full stop. I registered it as a comma....he he....yea i guess it is a typo.....

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1790

Kudos [?]: 1102 [0], given: 5

Location: New York
Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2008, 20:32
Because of "fullstop" I chose.. D.. If it is comma.. then will go for 'E'
_________________

Your attitude determines your altitude
Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Kudos [?]: 1102 [0], given: 5

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1339

Kudos [?]: 877 [0], given: 10

Reviews Badge
Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2008, 14:44
Folks,
I saw this SC in the OG. The "." in E is a typo.

OA is E

Kudos [?]: 877 [0], given: 10

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 617

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 1

Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2008, 17:13
"whereby" doesn't fit

"Under a provision Congress is required" sounds right whereas "under a provision whereby Congress is required" is very awkward.

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 457

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 4

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jan 2009, 14:17
goalsnr wrote:
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.

A. was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

B. was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

C. was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

D. has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

E. has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

Why E is better than D?


Seems like the OA is E. My question is, why is past perfect preferred to simple past?
_________________

-Underline your question. It takes only a few seconds!
-Search before you post.

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 4

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2010
Posts: 72

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 11

Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2011, 19:44
I chose E but I was wondering

- OG12 says whereby makes sentence fragmented so D is wrong. Can anybody explain why?

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 11

VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1268

Kudos [?]: 291 [0], given: 10

Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2011, 20:16
Between options D and E,whereby is unnecessary in option D.Hence E stands apart.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Kudos [?]: 291 [0], given: 10

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Dec 2010
Posts: 277

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 23

Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Other)
Reviews Badge
Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2011, 23:58
prasforgmat wrote:
I chose E but I was wondering

- OG12 says whereby makes sentence fragmented so D is wrong. Can anybody explain why?


I was also wandering for the same, here is what wiki has to say...

Use of whereby as a formal equivalent of where is nonstandard and is avoided by careful speakers and writers, who use where or in which instead. The term typically fails readability and comprehension review so it is generally avoided in published works. The term is also avoided by speakers as it makes it difficult to understand the message that is trying to be communicated.


After reading the the above & the way GMAC evaluate sentences use of whereby raises a red flag at first place!
_________________

My GMAT Journey 540->680->730!


~ When the going gets tough, the Tough gets going!

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 23

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 66

Kudos [?]: 106 [1], given: 14

Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Aug 2011, 23:44
1
This post received
KUDOS
Q. Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied,Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.

(A) was never applied,Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

(B) was never applied,there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(C) was never applied,whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(D) has never been applied,whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

(E) has never been applied,Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

Please explain.
_________________

---Winners do it differently---

Kudos [?]: 106 [1], given: 14

4 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4321

Kudos [?]: 8331 [4], given: 366

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Aug 2011, 23:57
4
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Because you cannot find a suitable referent for the pronoun it, choices A, B, and C are gone. Between D and E, D is a fragment without a working verb. The conjunction whereby spoils the show for D. E survives
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Kudos [?]: 8331 [4], given: 366

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 73

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 3

Location: India
Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Aug 2011, 00:14
1
This post received
KUDOS
Hi,

was never applied, has been - incorrect tense match. A, B and C are out
preposition + noun should be the correct form.
Under...., congress.. is the right choice. Hence E

Thanks
Sony
_________________

A bend in the road is not the end of the road unless you fail to take a turn.....

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 3

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 15

Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2011, 17:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
RohitKalla wrote:
Q. Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied,Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.

(A) was never applied,Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

(B) was never applied,there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(C) was never applied,whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(D) has never been applied,whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

(E) has never been applied,Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

Please explain.


A, B and C are out because it should be "has never been applied". Between D and E, D is out because "whereby" is awkward. That leaves E.

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 15

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 190

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 7

Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.6
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)
Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2011, 08:55
Agreeing with the explanation, also chose E
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-guide-to-the-official-guide-13-for-gmat-review-134210.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 7

1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1626

Kudos [?]: 1139 [1], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2011, 05:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
+1 E

We don't have a specific date in the past. We need present perfect.
"whereby" subordinates the clause. We wouldn't have a main clause in D.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1139 [1], given: 109

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 247

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 20

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Dec 2011, 02:40
yogesh1984 wrote:
prasforgmat wrote:
I chose E but I was wondering

- OG12 says whereby makes sentence fragmented so D is wrong. Can anybody explain why?


I was also wandering for the same, here is what wiki has to say...

Use of whereby as a formal equivalent of where is nonstandard and is avoided by careful speakers and writers, who use where or in which instead. The term typically fails readability and comprehension review so it is generally avoided in published works. The term is also avoided by speakers as it makes it difficult to understand the message that is trying to be communicated.


After reading the the above & the way GMAC evaluate sentences use of whereby raises a red flag at first place!


When we use 'whereby' it means that sentence is not complete. The first part of the sentence already begins with 'Under' which again does not complete the sentence. Hence, we should not have 'whereby' in the second part. If we had something else after the second part or if the first part were able to complete the sentence, usage of 'whereby' would have correct, probably.
_________________

-------------------------
-Aravind Chembeti

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 20

Re: Under a provision of the Constitution that was never   [#permalink] 31 Dec 2011, 02:40

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 36 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Under a provision of the Constitution that was never

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.