Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 28 Mar 2017, 05:12

Join Chat Room7 for Latest Decision Updates

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Under current federal law, employers are allowed to offer

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1367
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 640 [0], given: 10

Under current federal law, employers are allowed to offer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 May 2008, 19:52
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:53) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 22 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Under current federal law, employers are allowed to offer their employees free parking spaces as a tax-free benefit, but they can offer employees only up to $180 per year as a tax-free benefit for using mass transit. The government could significantly increase mass transit ridership by raising the limit of this benefit to meet commuters transportation costs. The proposal above to increase mass transit ridership assumes that (A) current mass transit systems are subject to unexpected route closings and delays (B) using mass transit creates less air pollution per person than using a private automobile (C) the parking spaces offered by employers as tax-free benefits can be worth as much as$2,500 per year

(D) many employees are deterred by financial considerations from using mass transit to commute to their places of employment

(E) because of traffic congestion on major commuter routes, it is often faster to travel to ones place of employment by means of mass transit than by private
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 789
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - mass transit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 May 2008, 20:01
D
Manager
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 156
Schools: Kellogg(A), Wharton(W), Columbia(D)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - mass transit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 May 2008, 21:29
D
Manager
Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 165
Location: Mumbai
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - mass transit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 May 2008, 21:47
D - what is the OA?
CEO
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2986
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 591 [0], given: 210

Re: CR - mass transit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 May 2008, 22:17
Straight D, it is the only one that even remotely addresses the question posed.
Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 133
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - mass transit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 May 2008, 04:07
assumes that riders pick mass transit based on tax free benefit options. (financial incentive) So D stands out.

goalsnr wrote:
Under current federal law, employers are allowed to offer their employees free parking spaces as a tax-free benefit, but they can offer employees only up to $180 per year as a tax-free benefit for using mass transit. The government could significantly increase mass transit ridership by raising the limit of this benefit to meet commuters transportation costs. The proposal above to increase mass transit ridership assumes that (A) current mass transit systems are subject to unexpected route closings and delays (B) using mass transit creates less air pollution per person than using a private automobile (C) the parking spaces offered by employers as tax-free benefits can be worth as much as$2,500 per year

(D) many employees are deterred by financial considerations from using mass transit to commute to their places of employment

(E) because of traffic congestion on major commuter routes, it is often faster to travel to ones place of employment by means of mass transit than by private
Director
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 733
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 190 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - mass transit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 May 2008, 05:03
goalsnr wrote:
Under current federal law, employers are allowed to offer their employees free parking spaces as a tax-free benefit, but they can offer employees only up to $180 per year as a tax-free benefit for using mass transit. The government could significantly increase mass transit ridership by raising the limit of this benefit to meet commuters transportation costs. The proposal above to increase mass transit ridership assumes that (A) current mass transit systems are subject to unexpected route closings and delays (B) using mass transit creates less air pollution per person than using a private automobile (C) the parking spaces offered by employers as tax-free benefits can be worth as much as$2,500 per year

(D) many employees are deterred by financial considerations from using mass transit to commute to their places of employment

(E) because of traffic congestion on major commuter routes, it is often faster to travel to ones place of employment by means of mass transit than by private

Clearly.. D.
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1367
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 640 [0], given: 10

Re: CR - mass transit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 May 2008, 09:09
OA is D
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10671
Followers: 958

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 0

Re: Under current federal law, employers are allowed to offer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2016, 03:06
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Under current federal law, employers are allowed to offer   [#permalink] 24 Jul 2016, 03:06
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 It has been against the law for federal agencies and federal 14 16 Nov 2007, 19:45
1 Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to 1 07 Dec 2011, 01:36
4 Hutonian Government Official: Federal law requires truck 22 01 Oct 2008, 01:15
It has been against the law for federal agencies and federal 0 18 Nov 2007, 05:41
Under current federal law, employers are allowed to offer 0 26 Jul 2007, 16:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by