It is currently 24 Sep 2017, 18:00

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

United Energy recently invested in a series of large

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10167

Kudos [?]: 256 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2015, 19:20
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 256 [0], given: 0

CEO
CEO
User avatar
G
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2589

Kudos [?]: 380 [0], given: 177

Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '20
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2015, 15:16
yuvrajpratap wrote:
United Energy recently invested in a series of large windmills which are able to produce renewable energy with minimal negative effect to the environment. The company has not drilled oil wells in the same area, even though greater revenues and profits could be generated from oil wells. Because any drilling would disrupt the native habitat of certain marine species in the area, some environmentalists assert that, by foregoing this drilling, United Energy has established that it places environmental impact over financial returns. However, United Energy may be acting in a manner consistent with its financial goals. Recent patterns of increasing annual hurricane activity have some experts questioning the long-term viability and profitability of oil wells in the area.


C for me too.

the conclusion is: UE may be acting in a manner consistent with its financial goals.
the conclusion of the environmentalist is: UE places environmental impact over financial returns.

first one is a fact, and can be used as a premise for the conclusion of the environmentalist.

(A) The first supports the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
no, the first one does not support the conclusion of the argument. furthermore, the second does not call the conclusion into question; it is an intermediate conclusion.

(B) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second supports that conclusion.
no, the first one is a fact, it is not a conclusion. the second one is an intermediate conclusion, and it does not support the main conclusion.

(C) The first supports the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second states that conclusion.
looks good.

(D) The first states the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second provides a consideration in support of that conclusion.
the functions should be vice versa. let's see why:
UE envir>$, therefore greater revenues could be generated from oil wells. doesn't make sense.
now, let's try the correct way: greater revenues could be generated from oil wells. since UE uses windmills, UE established that it places EI over fin. returns. - now this looks better.

(E) The first supports the conclusion of the argument; the second also supports the conclusion of the argument.
no, the first is a general fact, and it does not support the conclusion. the second as well does not support the conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 380 [0], given: 177

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Feb 2016, 04:39
The first is a fact (evidence) that supports the second claim (conclusion).
Choice C is correct.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Feb 2016, 03:13
The first is a fact (finding, evidence) ; A - C – E
The second is claim (conclusion) – C
Đáp án C.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Posts: 49

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 15

Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2016, 16:20
Hi Yuvraj/ Whoever is preparing for GMAT now,

As mentioned in one of the posts earlier, I am big big fan of the @egmat's strategy for bold face questions. Even though you may not get more than 2 bold face questions on the test but just having one more CR type question under you control adds a lot to the confidence. I had a similar problem with bold face questions but i THINK i am much much better now.

To summarise, the strategy asks you to do two things:

1. Tag each statement ( including bold faces) of the argument as the possible options: conclusion / belief / evidence/ explanation/ pattern etc.
2. CLEARLY understand the meaning of each of these options.

I generally dont use the notepad to solve CR questions but I ensure that write down the what i mentioned above while solving BF questions before I proceed to the options. This will help you a LOT in not getting confused.

I hope this helps. Let me know if you need any other information, I will be more than happy to help :) All the best ! :)

Regards,
Shradha

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 15

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Posts: 49

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 15

Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2016, 16:23
Hi Yuvraj/ Whoever is preparing for GMAT now,

As mentioned in one of the posts earlier, I am big big fan of the @egmat's strategy for bold face questions. Even though you may not get more than 2 bold face questions on the test but just having one more CR type question under your control adds a lot to the confidence. I had a similar problem with bold face questions but i THINK i am much much better now.
To summarise, the strategy asks you to do two things:

1. Tag each statement ( including bold faces) of the argument as one of the following possible options: conclusion / belief / evidence/ explanation/ pattern etc.
2. CLEARLY understand the meaning of each of these options.

I generally dont use the notepad to solve CR questions but I ensure that write down the what i mentioned above while solving BF questions before I proceed to the options. This will help you a LOT in not getting confused.

I hope this helps. Let me know if you need any other information, I will be more than happy to help :) All the best ! :)

Regards,
Shradha

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 15

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 690

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 855

Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Apr 2017, 23:57
The first part: Eventhough--- is a counter premise indicator

(at this point: B is out)

The second: is basically what the Environmentalists conclude...

(at this point D is out)
(A is out... no question is being asked in the second bold face)

Left with: C, E

E--> Is incorrect.. as both cant support a conclusion..can you find the conclusion they support???


C: 2nd is the environmentalists conclusion..and first is reinforcing their conclusion..by stating that the company placed Envi over $$...

hence C
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 855

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Feb 2014
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 156

Concentration: Finance, International Business
GPA: 3
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2017, 19:05
Easy C.

(A) The first supports the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(B) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second supports that conclusion.
(C) The first supports the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second states that conclusion.
(D) The first states the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second provides a consideration in support of that conclusion.
(E) The first supports the conclusion of the argument; the second also supports the conclusion of the argument.
_________________

Kudos if you like my post

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 156

VP
VP
User avatar
G
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1031

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 504

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2017, 22:09
yuvrajpratap wrote:
United Energy recently invested in a series of large windmills which are able to produce renewable energy with minimal negative effect to the environment. The company has not drilled oil wells in the same area, even though greater revenues and profits could be generated from oil wells. Because any drilling would disrupt the native habitat of certain marine species in the area, some environmentalists assert that, by foregoing this drilling, United Energy has established that it places environmental impact over financial returns. However, United Energy may be acting in a manner consistent with its financial goals. Recent patterns of increasing annual hurricane activity have some experts questioning the long-term viability and profitability of oil wells in the area.

The two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first supports the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(B) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second supports that conclusion.
(C) The first supports the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second states that conclusion.
(D) The first states the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second provides a consideration in support of that conclusion.
(E) The first supports the conclusion of the argument; the second also supports the conclusion of the argument.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OE
solution:
The argument concludes that United Energy may be acting in a manner consistent with reaching its financial goals. However, this conclusion must be distinguished from the assertion of the environmentalists described in the question - that the actions taken by United Energy indicate that the company is putting environmental concerns ahead of financial returns. The answer choices may consider either the author's conclusion (which is considered the overall conclusion) or the conclusion asserted by the environmentalists (which is considered the opposing opinion).

This is an Analyze the Argument Structure question. The best approach is to consider each boldface in turn.

(A) The first boldface does not support the author's conclusion that United Energy may be acting in a manner consistent with its financial goals; the second does not call the conclusion into question as much as state its opposite.

(B) The first boldface does not state the conclusion of the argument; the second boldface does not support the conclusion of the main argument, which is that United Energy may be acting in a manner consistent with its financial goals.

(C) CORRECT. The first boldface supports the environmentalists’ conclusion that United Energy is acting in a manner that places environmental impact ahead of financial returns. The second boldface states this conclusion.

(D) The first boldface is a relationship that does support the environmentalists' conclusion; however, the second states this conclusion, and does not undermine it.

(E) The first boldface does not support the author's conclusion, which is that United Energy may be acting in its financial interest; the second boldface also does not support this conclusion.
[Reveal] Spoiler: Doubt
I am confused can anyone how to solve bold face cr questions
Please suggest me a correct strategy ... any link from where I can read more
can bold face questions have 2 conclusions:


The answer is C
Statement 1 is just an observation by the environmentalist as he uses this fact to arrive at a conclusion that the company thinks about the environment first .
Statement 2 is the conclusion for which first statement supports.
_________________

We are more often frightened than hurt; and we suffer more from imagination than from reality

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 504

Director
Director
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 833

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 32

Premium Member
Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Aug 2017, 11:41
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 32

Math Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1496

Kudos [?]: 872 [0], given: 71

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Aug 2017, 06:10
The second boldface -"United Energy has established that it places environmental impact over financial returns" is environmentalists??? conclusion. But the main conclusion of the argument is -"However, United Energy may be acting in a manner consistent with its financial goals. " ?
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Kudos [?]: 872 [0], given: 71

Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large   [#permalink] 15 Aug 2017, 06:10

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 31 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

United Energy recently invested in a series of large

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.