It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 22:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 314

Kudos [?]: 392 [2], given: 9

United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2009, 23:48
2
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

75% (00:25) correct 25% (00:37) wrong based on 275 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts within the Democratic party during his first term, that included assistant majority whip and vice-chair of the Democratic Senatorial Committee.

A. that included
B. which includes
C. including
D. some of which were
E. among them being

[Reveal] Spoiler:
United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts within the Democratic party during his first term, that included assistant majority whip and vice-chair of the Democratic Senatorial Committee.

A. that included

that could refer to posts or term. The main problem is that the relative is preceded by a comma. Normally you shouldn't use a comma before that.

B. which includes

which refers to term, notice that the verb is in third person singular, which is not correct.

C. including

I don't know whether this "clearly" refers to posts but is the only option left. If someone can clarify why including is not ambiguous please do so.

D. some of which were

some of which ... modifies the previous noun. In this case term. This is not correct.

E. among them being

I think the use of being here is incorrect. Also among them has no clear reference.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 392 [2], given: 9

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 417

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 16

Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2009, 08:23
I would go with D.
For me , some of which were looks better option than including
_________________

Never give up,,,

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 16

Current Student
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 186

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 62

Location: Ithaca, New York
Schools: Cornell University - The Johnson School
Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2009, 08:40
I choose C.

Here's my reasoning ....

A) By using "that" it refers to term ... that makes no sense.

B) Same problem as "A"

C) including serves to modify "posts" ... I like this answer.

D) Wordy

E) Wordy

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 62

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 314

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 9

Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2009, 08:57
Franklin wrote:
I choose C.

Here's my reasoning ....

A) By using "that" it refers to term ... that makes no sense.

B) Same problem as "A"

C) including serves to modify "posts" ... I like this answer.

D) Wordy

E) Wordy

I agree that the answer should be C, because the others are wrong. But could you explain why including refers to "posts" instead of term?

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 9

Current Student
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 186

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 62

Location: Ithaca, New York
Schools: Cornell University - The Johnson School
Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2009, 11:15
mikeCoolBoy wrote:
Franklin wrote:
I choose C.

Here's my reasoning ....

A) By using "that" it refers to term ... that makes no sense.

B) Same problem as "A"

C) including serves to modify "posts" ... I like this answer.

D) Wordy

E) Wordy

I agree that the answer should be C, because the others are wrong. But could you explain why including refers to "posts" instead of term?

I actually edited my previous post. I explained my reasoning but it still didn't seem right to me and still doesn't so I deleted it. I felt that including modifies "posts" but the way the sentence is structured it doesn't make sense so I rewrote the sentence in my head ...

"During his first term, United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts within the Democratic party, including assistant majority whip and vice-chair of the Democratic Senatorial Committee."

This made more sense to me. Answer C really isn't right with the original sentence ... it's probably wrong because "including" may modify posts or it may not but I couldn't justify choosing any of the other answers because they were clearly wrong, e.g., to use "that" there shouldn't be a comma, "which" is a relative pronoun and refers to "term", etc ... So C is the best out of the bunch but I couldn't come up with a good reason that justifies choosing the answer other than it is better than the others.

This seems to be a bad question. Thoughts?

Is C wrong?

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 62

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 314

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 9

Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2009, 01:57
I completely agree with you. I searched the OA and is C. However, I don't know why including refers to posts. It obviously makes sense but is it grammatically unambiguous?

I don't know if someone can explain it please do so.

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 9

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 47

Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2010, 13:59
In this kind of questions always chose ing form
Hence my choice is C

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 47

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1476

Kudos [?]: 756 [0], given: 6

Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2010, 14:43
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts within the Democratic party during his first term, that included assistant majority whip and vice-chair of the Democratic Senatorial Committee.

A. that included - 'that' after a comma is almost wrong in GMAT
B. which includes - 'which' modifies the noun preceding the comma. In this case 'which' is modifying 'term' which is incorrect
C. including - 'including' is a modifier that is modfiying the entire preceding clause. Hence correct.
D. some of which were - 'some of which' is adjective which modifies the closest noun. Here it is modifying 'term' which is not the intent.
E. among them being -

Kudos [?]: 756 [0], given: 6

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10118

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 May 2014, 06:43
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10118

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Apr 2016, 16:42
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2014
Posts: 34

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 31

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 10-17-2014
GPA: 4
WE: Analyst (Insurance)
Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Apr 2016, 21:49
A. that included --- That has ambiguous antecedant - posts and terrm
B. which includes --- similar as A
C. including ---Correct
D. some of which were --- Looks correct but C is concise
E. among them being --- I don't prefer using being unless it's used in a progressive tense

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 31

VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1403

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 916

Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2016, 06:31
[quote="mikeCoolBoy"]United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts within the Democratic party during his first term, that included assistant majority whip and vice-chair of the Democratic Senatorial Committee.

A. that included
B. which includes
C. including
D. some of which were
E. among them being

gmat want to teach us a pattern here.

which can not jump over adverb to modify a far noun, though it can jump over a noun modifier to modify that noun.

this is a lesion
a,b,d are out
being in e is redundant.
including, unlike which, can jump over an adverb to modify a noun.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 916

Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 694

Kudos [?]: 179 [1], given: 855

Location: United States
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2017, 14:01
1
KUDOS
A - it modify first term rather than post, can't use comma before that
B - it modify first term rather than post
C - Correctly used comma + ing set up
D - This is not run on sentence and is incorrect because of same reason as in B
E - Creates run on sentence, being is wordy, and verb is missing.

In general, when you are using "that" as a relative pronoun to introduce a modifying clause, you should keep these two things in mind:

1) "that" won't be preceded by a comma
2) "that" will refer to the preceding noun
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Kudos [?]: 179 [1], given: 855

Intern
Joined: 04 Nov 2015
Posts: 36

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2017, 12:22
anairamitch1804 wrote:
A - it modify first term rather than post, can't use comma before that
B - it modify first term rather than post
C - Correctly used comma + ing set up
D - This is not run on sentence and is incorrect because of same reason as in B
E - Creates run on sentence, being is wordy, and verb is missing.

In general, when you are using "that" as a relative pronoun to introduce a modifying clause, you should keep these two things in mind:

1) "that" won't be preceded by a comma
2) "that" will refer to the preceding noun

Hi Anaira ,

Don't you think the verg ing modifier must makes sense with the subject of the clause it modifies ,I suppose United states senator Daniel Inouye is the subject and this ing modifier dosen't makes sense with this.Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Math Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1525

Kudos [?]: 947 [0], given: 72

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2017, 22:09
United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts within the Democratic party during his first term, that included assistant majority whip and vice-chair of the Democratic Senatorial Committee.

A. that included - usage of comma + that is incorrect
B. which includes - which refers to first term
C. including - Correct
D. some of which were - the "which" is trying to refer to "several posts", which is way too far away from the comma to be acceptable
E. among them being - usage of being

EMPOWERgmatRichC , GMATNinja , mikemcgarry , daagh , egmat , GMATNinjaTwo , sayantanc2k , other experts
Comma + including modifies the preceding noun and thus does not actually work like a verb+ ing . But isn't posts too far away for comma+including to work this way?
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Kudos [?]: 947 [0], given: 72

Intern
Joined: 03 Oct 2012
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 5

Location: India
WE: Brand Management (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2017, 00:04
A) use of past tense in included not required.
B) posts - includes, S-V disagreement.
C) including: appropriate as modifies posts
D) wordy
E) being not appropriate

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 131

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 322

Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2017, 03:24
d is wrong wrong because which can not refer to a far noun
while
including can refer to a far noun

this is extremly hard problem

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 322

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4422

Kudos [?]: 8432 [0], given: 102

Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2017, 15:07
Skywalker18 wrote:
United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts within the Democratic party during his first term, that included assistant majority whip and vice-chair of the Democratic Senatorial Committee.

A. that included - usage of comma + that is incorrect
B. which includes - which refers to first term
C. including - Correct
D. some of which were - the "which" is trying to refer to "several posts", which is way too far away from the comma to be acceptable
E. among them being - usage of being

Comma + including modifies the preceding noun and thus does not actually work like a verb+ ing . But isn't posts too far away for comma+including to work this way?

Dear Skywalker18,

I'm happy to respond.

The short answer is "no," it's not too far.

Here, it's important to appreciate the different between vital vs. non-vital modifiers. See
GMAT Grammar: Vital Noun Modifiers

The word "posts" is generic and nondescript. It needs clarification. Both prepositional phrases are necessary to describe it. This is the entire phrase
" . . . posts within the Democratic party during his first term . . . "
This phrase functions as a single logical unit, and this single logical unit is "touching" the modifier "including" that targets it.

The distance that matters is not a word count. The distance that matter is one of logic & meaning, and in this context, there's really no distance at all between target and modifier.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Kudos [?]: 8432 [0], given: 102

Intern
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 45

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 73

Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2017, 03:39
mikemcgarry wrote:
Skywalker18 wrote:
United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts within the Democratic party during his first term, that included assistant majority whip and vice-chair of the Democratic Senatorial Committee.

A. that included - usage of comma + that is incorrect
B. which includes - which refers to first term
C. including - Correct
D. some of which were - the "which" is trying to refer to "several posts", which is way too far away from the comma to be acceptable
E. among them being - usage of being

Comma + including modifies the preceding noun and thus does not actually work like a verb+ ing . But isn't posts too far away for comma+including to work this way?

Dear Skywalker18,

I'm happy to respond.

The short answer is "no," it's not too far.

Here, it's important to appreciate the different between vital vs. non-vital modifiers. See
GMAT Grammar: Vital Noun Modifiers

The word "posts" is generic and nondescript. It needs clarification. Both prepositional phrases are necessary to describe it. This is the entire phrase
" . . . posts within the Democratic party during his first term . . . "
This phrase functions as a single logical unit, and this single logical unit is "touching" the modifier "including" that targets it.

The distance that matters is not a word count. The distance that matter is one of logic & meaning, and in this context, there's really no distance at all between target and modifier.

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Hi Mike,
Please clarify the below- comma + ing modifies the preceding clause and modifies the subject as well. Now, subject of the sentence is United States Senator Daniel Inouye , so how including is modifying the subject. As per the meaning including should modify posts, so is comma+ing (including) presently gives additional information about the preceding clause.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 73

Intern
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 45

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 73

Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2017, 03:42
hi, I understood why other options a/b/d/e are incorrect. I have a few cents of doubt in option c-
Please clarify the below- comma + ing modifies the preceding clause and modifies the subject as well. Now, subject of the sentence is United States Senator Daniel Inouye , so how including is modifying the subject. As per the meaning including should modify posts, so is comma+ing (including) presently give additional information about the preceding clause and thus do not modify the subject?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 73

Re: United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts wit   [#permalink] 23 Sep 2017, 03:42

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by