It is currently 22 Jun 2017, 19:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of

Author Message
Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 796
Location: Singapore
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 02:00
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of paint that lie buried beneath the surface layers of old paintings. They claim, for example, that additional mountainous scenery once appeared in Leonardo da Vinciâ€™s Mona Lisa, which was later painted over. Skeptics reply to these claims, however, that X-ray examinations of the Mona Lisa do not show hidden mountains.

Which of the following, if true, would tend most to weaken the force of the skepticsâ€™ objections?

(A) There is no written or anecdotal record that Leonardo da Vinci ever painted over major areas of his Mona Lisa.
(B) Painters of da Vinciâ€™s time commonly created images of mountainous scenery in the backgrounds of portraits like the Mona Lisa.
(C) No one knows for certain what parts of the Mona Lisa may have been painted by da Vinciâ€™s assistants rather than by da Vinci himself.
(D) Infrared photography of the Mona Lisa has revealed no trace of hidden mountainous scenery.
(E) Analysis relying on X-rays only has the capacity to detect lead-based white pigments in layers of paint beneath a paintingâ€™s surface layers.

I got the OA tru POE, but not quite convinced!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 500

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 03:26
It has to be E.
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 500

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 03:31
It has to be E.
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1885
Re: CR - Mona Lisa [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 04:22
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of paint that lie buried beneath the surface layers of old paintings. They claim, for example, that additional mountainous scenery once appeared in Leonardo da Vinciâ€™s Mona Lisa, which was later painted over. Skeptics reply to these claims, however, that X-ray examinations of the Mona Lisa do not show hidden mountains.

Which of the following, if true, would tend most to weaken the force of the skepticsâ€™ objections?

(A) There is no written or anecdotal record that Leonardo da Vinci ever painted over major areas of his Mona Lisa.--->out of scope.
(B) Painters of da Vinciâ€™s time commonly created images of mountainous scenery in the backgrounds of portraits like the Mona Lisa. ----> not related coz it doesn't mean that Da Vinci would have the same drawing style.
(C) No one knows for certain what parts of the Mona Lisa may have been painted by da Vinciâ€™s assistants rather than by da Vinci himself.---> out of scope
(D) Infrared photography of the Mona Lisa has revealed no trace of hidden mountainous scenery.-----> even strengthen the skeptics' argument
(E) Analysis relying on X-rays only has the capacity to detect lead-based white pigments in layers of paint beneath a paintingâ€™s surface layers. --> Yeah~!

E it is.
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 206

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 10:12
one more E.
Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 227
Location: Germany
Re: CR - Mona Lisa [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 11:50
rahulraao wrote:
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of paint that lie buried beneath the surface layers of old paintings. They claim, for example, that additional mountainous scenery once appeared in Leonardo da Vinciâ€™s Mona Lisa, which was later painted over. Skeptics reply to these claims, however, that X-ray examinations of the Mona Lisa do not show hidden mountains.

Which of the following, if true, would tend most to weaken the force of the skepticsâ€™ objections?

(A) There is no written or anecdotal record that Leonardo da Vinci ever painted over major areas of his Mona Lisa.
(B) Painters of da Vinciâ€™s time commonly created images of mountainous scenery in the backgrounds of portraits like the Mona Lisa.
(C) No one knows for certain what parts of the Mona Lisa may have been painted by da Vinciâ€™s assistants rather than by da Vinci himself.
(D) Infrared photography of the Mona Lisa has revealed no trace of hidden mountainous scenery.
(E) Analysis relying on X-rays only has the capacity to detect lead-based white pigments in layers of paint beneath a paintingâ€™s surface layers.

I got the OA tru POE, but not quite convinced!

E it is.

It is the only one (minus D) which addresses the argument and discusses Xrays. D would strengthen the argument, so E it is.
SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1707
Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 12:19
yup I got E.
_________________

hey ya......

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1801

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 15:13
Yes it has to be E.
Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 796
Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 15:31
Wonder where I got confused!! Seems a very clear E!
OA is E!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

16 Nov 2005, 15:31
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
CR with no reasonal analyze on the net 0 03 Dec 2016, 00:01
About 75% of the people that use computer 0 01 Jul 2015, 07:48
A recent research study of undergraduate students analyzed 14 05 Feb 2009, 02:55
A recent research study of undergraduate students analyzed 3 21 May 2008, 08:12
The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is 4 04 Jul 2007, 13:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by