It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 23:12

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 20 Nov 2006
Posts: 213

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2007, 11:35
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

12. Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of paint that lie buried beneath the surface layers of old paintings. They claim, for example, that additional mountainous scenery once appeared in Leonardo da Vinciâ€™s Mona Lisa, which was later painted over. Skeptics reply to these claims, however, that X-ray examinations of the Mona Lisa do not show hidden mountains.
Which of the following, if true, would tend most to weaken the force of the skepticsâ€™ objections?
(A) There is no written or anecdotal record that Leonardo da Vinci ever painted over major areas of his Mona Lisa.
(B) Painters of da Vinciâ€™s time commonly created images of mountainous scenery in the backgrounds of portraits like the Mona Lisa.
(C) No one knows for certain what parts of the Mona Lisa may have been painted by da Vinciâ€™s assistants rather than by da Vinci himself.
(D) Infrared photography of the Mona Lisa has revealed no trace of hidden mountainous scenery.
(E) Analysis relying on X-rays only has the capacity to detect lead-based white pigments in layers of paint beneath a paintingâ€™s surface layers.

It would nice to see the explanation to the answers.. as i cannot find a proper explanation for the OA.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1552

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 1

Location: Ann Arbor
Schools: Ross '10
Re: 1000CR - Mona Lisa [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2007, 11:55
surbab wrote:
12. Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of paint that lie buried beneath the surface layers of old paintings. They claim, for example, that additional mountainous scenery once appeared in Leonardo da Vinciâ€™s Mona Lisa, which was later painted over. Skeptics reply to these claims, however, that X-ray examinations of the Mona Lisa do not show hidden mountains.
Which of the following, if true, would tend most to weaken the force of the skepticsâ€™ objections?
(A) There is no written or anecdotal record that Leonardo da Vinci ever painted over major areas of his Mona Lisa.
(B) Painters of da Vinciâ€™s time commonly created images of mountainous scenery in the backgrounds of portraits like the Mona Lisa.
(C) No one knows for certain what parts of the Mona Lisa may have been painted by da Vinciâ€™s assistants rather than by da Vinci himself.
(D) Infrared photography of the Mona Lisa has revealed no trace of hidden mountainous scenery.
(E) Analysis relying on X-rays only has the capacity to detect lead-based white pigments in layers of paint beneath a paintingâ€™s surface layers.

It would nice to see the explanation to the answers.. as i cannot find a proper explanation for the OA.

The argument of the critics is based on the assumption that x-ray can detect any layer of paint hidden below the surface. If E were true, then a layer of paint not made of lead-based paint and hidden below the surface cannot be detected by the x-ray and computer analysis may reveal this layer.

Thus, E will weaken the skeptic's argument.

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 350

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2007, 17:03
Clear E.

The answer choice has to attack the weakness of using x-rays and only E mentions it.

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2007, 21:40
My vote for E

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 195

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: California
Re: 1000CR - Mona Lisa [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2007, 00:00
surbab wrote:
12. Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of paint that lie buried beneath the surface layers of old paintings. They claim, for example, that additional mountainous scenery once appeared in Leonardo da Vinciâ€™s Mona Lisa, which was later painted over. Skeptics reply to these claims, however, that X-ray examinations of the Mona Lisa do not show hidden mountains.
Which of the following, if true, would tend most to weaken the force of the skepticsâ€™ objections?
(A) There is no written or anecdotal record that Leonardo da Vinci ever painted over major areas of his Mona Lisa.
(B) Painters of da Vinciâ€™s time commonly created images of mountainous scenery in the backgrounds of portraits like the Mona Lisa.
(C) No one knows for certain what parts of the Mona Lisa may have been painted by da Vinciâ€™s assistants rather than by da Vinci himself.
(D) Infrared photography of the Mona Lisa has revealed no trace of hidden mountainous scenery.
(E) Analysis relying on X-rays only has the capacity to detect lead-based white pigments in layers of paint beneath a paintingâ€™s surface layers.

It would nice to see the explanation to the answers.. as i cannot find a proper explanation for the OA.

E

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: 1000CR - Mona Lisa   [#permalink] 06 Apr 2007, 00:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.