GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 27 Jan 2020, 08:40

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# V01-14

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 60685

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2014, 01:54
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (01:33) correct 46% (01:57) wrong based on 83 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Most people who run for an elected office do so because they want to be of service to the public. If, however, an official publishes a book revealing information that had not previously been made public and profits from the publication, that person’s political career has inarguably come to an end because he or she will never again be trusted by other members of the government.

The conclusion that a public official who publishes a book has ended his or her political career rests on which of the following assumptions?

A. Most government officials seek office in order to serve the public.
B. Public officials must often keep information secret.
C. Trust is essential for a successful career as a public official.
D. Members of the government frequently do not trust authors of books.
E. Public officials will seek to profit from their access to privileged information if given the opportunity.

_________________
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2838
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2016, 18:47
1
aniketm.87@gmail.com wrote:
mikeonbike wrote:
I think this is a high-quality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. I would like to question the preference of option C over B, IMO both hold similar validity as an answer to this question.

Same doubt here. Can somone please clarify?

The reasoning chain in this argument is as follows:

Premise (P): Trust is lost.
Conclusion (C): Political career comes to end.

P-----------> C

The assumtion is therefore: Trust is essential for a political career. Using negation technique to check validity of assumption, if trust is NOT an essential factor for political career, then losing trust does not necessarily mean end of political career - the argument breaks down negating option C. Option C is therefore an assumption.

Now, coming to option B, whether the offficlas MUST or MUST not keep information secret is not a part of this argument chain. The passage implies that publishing a book for own profit leads to loss of trust, but if the revelation of secret is not with the intention of personal profit, then it is not necessary that trust would be lost by revealing secret and hence not necessary that career would come to end.

Moreover the word "MUST" implies a mandate. It is not a necessary assumption that there is a mandatory requirement that official keep information secret.
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 481
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

25 Nov 2018, 11:26
1
I agree with the post of sid92shetty that "successful" makes the choice C incorrect. Putting an end to a carrier can not be construed as not having a successful career.
Poor quality Question.
_________________
------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 60685

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2014, 01:54
Official Solution:

Most people who run for an elected office do so because they want to be of service to the public. If, however, an official publishes a book revealing information that had not previously been made public and profits from the publication, that person’s political career has inarguably come to an end because he or she will never again be trusted by other members of the government.

The conclusion that a public official who publishes a book has ended his or her political career rests on which of the following assumptions?

A. Most government officials seek office in order to serve the public.
B. Public officials must often keep information secret.
C. Trust is essential for a successful career as a public official.
D. Members of the government frequently do not trust authors of books.
E. Public officials will seek to profit from their access to privileged information if given the opportunity.

Situation: The author argues that public officials who publish books containing information not previously made public end their careers because other members of the government will no longer trust them.

Reasoning: Which identifies the assumption necessary to the author’s conclusion? The first sentence introduces the idea of running for elected office as a way of serving the public. A contrast to this idea appears in the second sentence, which states that public officials sometimes publish books for their own profit. This publishing for profit undermines confidence and trust, since colleagues expect the official’s first priority to be serving the public. Without this trust, the passage argues, the official is unlikely to further progress in his or her career.
1. This is stated directly in the passage and can not be the underlying assumption.
2. Though this option is tempting, information...not previously made public is not necessarily secret.
3. According to the passage, a public official’s career ends when actions taken for personal profit undermine the trust placed in them by their colleagues.
4. This claim is not made in the passage.
5. Though the author discusses possible consequences when this does occur, the passage does not make the claim about most public officials.

_________________
Intern
Joined: 06 Feb 2016
Posts: 7
Location: United Arab Emirates
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.21

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2016, 13:20
I think this is a high-quality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. I would like to question the preference of option C over B, IMO both hold similar validity as an answer to this question.
Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Posts: 83

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2016, 08:02
mikeonbike wrote:
I think this is a high-quality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. I would like to question the preference of option C over B, IMO both hold similar validity as an answer to this question.

Same doubt here. Can somone please clarify?
_________________
You have to dig deep and find out what it takes to reshuffle the cards life dealt you
Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2016
Posts: 59
Location: United States (MA)
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 2.4

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2016, 19:14
sayantanc2k wrote:
aniketm.87@gmail.com wrote:
mikeonbike wrote:
I think this is a high-quality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. I would like to question the preference of option C over B, IMO both hold similar validity as an answer to this question.

Same doubt here. Can somone please clarify?

The reasoning chain in this argument is as follows:

Premise (P): Trust is lost.
Conclusion (C): Political career comes to end.

P-----------> C

The assumtion is therefore: Trust is essential for a political career. Using negation technique to check validity of assumption, if trust is NOT an essential factor for political career, then losing trust does not necessarily mean end of political career - the argument breaks down negating option C. Option C is therefore an assumption.

Now, coming to option B, whether the offficlas MUST or MUST not keep information secret is not a part of this argument chain. The passage implies that publishing a book for own profit leads to loss of trust, but if the revelation of secret is not with the intention of personal profit, then it is not necessary that trust would be lost by revelaing secret and hence not necessary that career would come to end.

Moreover the word "MUST" implies a mandate. It is not a necessary assumption that there is a mandatory requirement that official keep information secret.

Construing "must" in this case as some kind of mandate or government order is a pretty big stretch. B also hedges this absolute word with often; these guys must often do this or that. I picked B over C unfortunately. C says trust is necessary for successful politicians, but the prompt logic says trust is necessary to remain a politician. Successfulness seems out of scope. I guess since you need trust to be a politician at all, it would follow trust is necessary for politicans at any level of success. B states that public officials must often keep info secret. I messed up by incorrectly negating this- public officials must not keep info secret, which would break the argument in my opinion, but I forgot to account for the often. The negation of B would be officials sometimes keep info secret.

Sent from my SM-G928T using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 172
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 470 Q30 V20
GMAT 2: 620 Q42 V33

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2016, 10:47
Quote:
Moreover the word "MUST" implies a mandate. It is not a necessary assumption that there is a mandatory requirement that official keep information secret.

I narrowed down to B and C and the word "MUST" was actually fundamental to eliminate the wrong answer (TONE is always important)
Intern
Joined: 16 Aug 2016
Posts: 3

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2017, 01:23
Hi,
Option C mentions trust is essential for a successful career as a politician. However the success of the career is not relevant to the discussion of whether he has ended his career or not. I believe the words 'successful carrier' thus impede the value attributed to "Trust" in option C.
Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2017
Posts: 1

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2017, 17:12
I think this is a poor-quality question. Isn't this an assumption question??
Intern
Joined: 08 Jul 2015
Posts: 4

### Show Tags

25 Nov 2019, 11:30
I think this is a poor-quality question and I don't agree with the explanation. The premise seems to have some mistake.

"If, however, an official publishes a book revealing information that had not previously been made public and profits from the publication" - This statement is unclear.
Re V01-14   [#permalink] 25 Nov 2019, 11:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by