rocky620 wrote:
AndrewN sir
I chose option D over E.
The discovery (of something) can have multiple potential uses (in some fields).
The truths on the other hand (in option E) are the absolute facts (about something). How can we decide on
among the best options about their potential uses, when we know that the truths can either be good or bad (for someone/some field), what kind of uses are we talking about?
Even if we say that there are potential uses, the word among will be wrong (because there are only two options: Good & Bad).
Kindly Help.
Hello,
rocky620. I have discussed answer choices (D) and (E) in my first post in the thread, as well as (E) more above. I think the distinction you have created between "good or bad" truths is too narrow in scope. I read the word more as a synonym for
facts or even the singular
knowledge (although we still have to acknowledge the plurality of the actual word used). The sentence seems to be driving at the notion that,
of all the possible applications of accepted scientific facts or current knowledge, pure science as a field does not really concern itself with deciding how to harness such potential. A theoretical physicist, for example, might be more interested in the mathematics behind quantum physics than in seeing through the development of, say, a quantum computer. Since the application of a scientific discovery could go in any of a number of directions,
among is fitting to describe
potential uses.
To be clear, it is not as if I am saying that (D) is a poor answer choice, that it could not work, just that (E) is the safer bet, since
their has a clear referent (in
truths) and the sentence is easier to follow, as I explained in my first post in the thread.
I hope this helps. Thank you for thinking to ask.
- Andrew