It is currently 24 Nov 2017, 06:25

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# VeritasPrep blogpost: GMAT Data Sufficiency Powers and Roots

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 3

Location: United States
VeritasPrep blogpost: GMAT Data Sufficiency Powers and Roots [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2013, 19:29
Hi,

An article was posted 2 days back on their blog and I can't seem to open it now. I have the post saved on my Android app "Pocket". Here's the post in its entirety:

Even if you know the basic rules for questions involving powers and roots, it’s still common to feel some intimidation towards harder-looking GMAT questions.
The “ ” symbol is called the “radical” symbol. You may know the square root, but how comfortable are you with cube roots? For instance:

The “3″ in the above is the “index” of the radical; to simplify radicals, use your knowledge of factors:

64 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2

There are six 2’s in 64. Since the index is 3, we know we need three of the same number to pull it out from underneath the radical. Exponents and radicals appear most frequently on the GMAT in data sufficiency questions dealing with number properties:

If z < 0, then what is

?
If z is negative, then –z will be z. The absolute value of –z will be z. The square root of z*z = z. Since z is negative, the answer is –z. The number underneath a radical cannot be negative. It is imaginary.

When multiplying radicals, we can multiply the elements underneath the radicals:
√3 x √2 = √6

When dividing radicals, we can divide the elements underneath the radicals:
√6 / √2 = √3

When adding or subtracting similar radicals, treat the radicals like variables and combine like terms:
2√3 + 4√3 – √2 + 7√2 = 6√3 + 6√2

On the GMAT, you will never be required to know a decimal equivalent of a radical. If you see a complicated-looking radical, try to “ballpark” it. For example, it is enough to recognize that √110 is going to be slightly larger than 10, since √100 = 10. Let’s look at a question involving exponents:

Is x2 > x ?

(1) x2 > 4
(2) x > -2

Because you know your exponent rules, you know that whether x2 > x is true is dependent on what kind of number x is. Let’s quickly plug in:

If x = 1, then x2 > x = 1 > 1. Not true.
If x = ½, then x2 > x = ¼ > ½. Not true.
If x = 0, then x2 > x = 0 > 0. Not true.
If x = -1/2, then x2 > x = ¼ > -1/2. True.
If x = -1, then x2 > x = 1 > -1. True.

We can see that when x is negative, the answer will be YES. When x is positive, the answer will be NO. For Statement (1), x could be negative or positive, so insufficient. For (2), x could still be negative or positive. If we combine, x > 2 in order to satisfy both conditions.

The correct answer is (C).

The rules don’t change because powers and roots are combined with a secondary concept, such as inequalities here, so don’t let a combination of ideas throw you as you practice!

I'm having trouble understanding why the answer is C. For x^2 to be greater than x, x needs to have a 'value' greater than 1. For any x in -1 <= x <= 1, x^2 is not greater than x.
(1) seems to indicate that x is at least 2+ in value, which is sufficient to conclude that x^2 > x.

Please help me understand.

Thank you!

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 3

MBA Section Director
Status: Back to work...
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Posts: 4784

Kudos [?]: 3801 [0], given: 2448

Location: India
City: Pune
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
WE: Business Development (Manufacturing)
Re: VeritasPrep blogpost: GMAT Data Sufficiency Powers and Roots [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2013, 11:26
I am also stumped with this question.

Is x2 > x ?

(1) x2 > 4
(2) x > -2

is $$x^2$$>x --------> is $$x^2$$-x>0 ---------> is x(x-1)>0

We know product of two positive integers is positive and product of two negative integers is also positive

So either both x and (x-1) are positive. That means x>o and x-1>0 --------> x>o and x>1

or both x and (x-1) are negative. That means x<o and x-1<0 --------> x<o and x<1

Now we we need to consider outermost intervals of both possibilities. That means x>1 and x<0

So our question turn out to be Is x>1 or x<0 ????

S1) $$x^2$$ > 4 --------> $$x^2$$-4>0 ---------> (x-2)(x+2)>0

either both are positive x-2>0 and x+2>0 that means x>2 and x>-2

or both are negative x-2<0 and x+2<0 that means x<-2 and x<2

After considering outermost intervals of both possibilities we can conclude that x is greater than 2 or less than -2, which is sufficient to answer the question.

Regards,

Narenn
_________________

Kudos [?]: 3801 [0], given: 2448

Director
Affiliations: GMATQuantum
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Posts: 602

Kudos [?]: 498 [0], given: 17

Re: VeritasPrep blogpost: GMAT Data Sufficiency Powers and Roots [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2013, 23:38
The explanation to this problem is incorrect.

Is x^2 > x ?

(1) x^2 > 4
(2) x > -2

Statement 1: x^2>4 implies that either x>2 or x<-2, if x =3 then the answer to the question is Yes(9>3). In general, any number greater than 1 when squared is greater than the original number so the answer is Yes for all values of x greater than 2. If we consider the case of x<-2, here the square of x will always be positive and that will always exceed x, again the answer is Yes. Sufficient.

Statement 2: x > -2. If x = -1.5, then the answer is Yes, but if x = 1/2, then the answer is No. One can also use x = 0 or x = 1 to show No. Insufficient.

Answer is A.

Dabral

Kudos [?]: 498 [0], given: 17

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7751

Kudos [?]: 17877 [1], given: 235

Location: Pune, India
Re: VeritasPrep blogpost: GMAT Data Sufficiency Powers and Roots [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2013, 08:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
v1gnesh wrote:
Hi,

An article was posted 2 days back on their blog and I can't seem to open it now. I have the post saved on my Android app "Pocket". Here's the post in its entirety:

Even if you know the basic rules for questions involving powers and roots, it’s still common to feel some intimidation towards harder-looking GMAT questions.
The “ ” symbol is called the “radical” symbol. You may know the square root, but how comfortable are you with cube roots? For instance:

The “3″ in the above is the “index” of the radical; to simplify radicals, use your knowledge of factors:

64 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2

There are six 2’s in 64. Since the index is 3, we know we need three of the same number to pull it out from underneath the radical. Exponents and radicals appear most frequently on the GMAT in data sufficiency questions dealing with number properties:

If z < 0, then what is

?
If z is negative, then –z will be z. The absolute value of –z will be z. The square root of z*z = z. Since z is negative, the answer is –z. The number underneath a radical cannot be negative. It is imaginary.

When multiplying radicals, we can multiply the elements underneath the radicals:
√3 x √2 = √6

When dividing radicals, we can divide the elements underneath the radicals:
√6 / √2 = √3

When adding or subtracting similar radicals, treat the radicals like variables and combine like terms:
2√3 + 4√3 – √2 + 7√2 = 6√3 + 6√2

On the GMAT, you will never be required to know a decimal equivalent of a radical. If you see a complicated-looking radical, try to “ballpark” it. For example, it is enough to recognize that √110 is going to be slightly larger than 10, since √100 = 10. Let’s look at a question involving exponents:

Is x2 > x ?

(1) x2 > 4
(2) x > -2

Because you know your exponent rules, you know that whether x2 > x is true is dependent on what kind of number x is. Let’s quickly plug in:

If x = 1, then x2 > x = 1 > 1. Not true.
If x = ½, then x2 > x = ¼ > ½. Not true.
If x = 0, then x2 > x = 0 > 0. Not true.
If x = -1/2, then x2 > x = ¼ > -1/2. True.
If x = -1, then x2 > x = 1 > -1. True.

We can see that when x is negative, the answer will be YES. When x is positive, the answer will be NO. For Statement (1), x could be negative or positive, so insufficient. For (2), x could still be negative or positive. If we combine, x > 2 in order to satisfy both conditions.

The correct answer is (C).

The rules don’t change because powers and roots are combined with a secondary concept, such as inequalities here, so don’t let a combination of ideas throw you as you practice!

I'm having trouble understanding why the answer is C. For x^2 to be greater than x, x needs to have a 'value' greater than 1. For any x in -1 <= x <= 1, x^2 is not greater than x.
(1) seems to indicate that x is at least 2+ in value, which is sufficient to conclude that x^2 > x.

Please help me understand.

Thank you!

I would guess that the reason you cannot find that post anymore is that it has been put down because an error had crept into it.
The answer to this question is (A).

(1) $$x^2 > 4$$ tells you that x > 2 or x < -2
In that case, definitely, $$x^2 > x$$ holds
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17877 [1], given: 235

Intern
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 3

Location: United States
Re: VeritasPrep blogpost: GMAT Data Sufficiency Powers and Roots [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2013, 19:13
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
I would guess that the reason you cannot find that post anymore is that it has been put down because an error had crept into it.
The answer to this question is (A).

(1) $$x^2 > 4$$ tells you that x > 2 or x < -2
In that case, definitely, $$x^2 > x$$ holds

Thank you, Karishma!

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 3

Re: VeritasPrep blogpost: GMAT Data Sufficiency Powers and Roots   [#permalink] 03 May 2013, 19:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# VeritasPrep blogpost: GMAT Data Sufficiency Powers and Roots

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.