It is currently 23 Sep 2017, 22:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Very few software engineers have left MicroFirm Corporation

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 224

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 20

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: MicroFirm [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2010, 10:05
"Therefore, if Gina refrains from gambling she will also avoid being penniless. The refraining is not compulsary to be penniless.It's just one possibility." ---> i don't completely agree with that jaxis

If she refrains (by copying Robert's behavior) ---> she WILL avoid being penniless; this implies that if she does not refrain then she will NOT avoid, i.e., she will be penniless, else using the word "avoid" here would not make sense. Also note that it says "will also avoid", not "may" avoid. Thus refraining is 'compulsory' as you put it.

That is the flawed argument and I agree with Tommy's analysis of this above

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 20

Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 348

Kudos [?]: 1592 [0], given: 11

Location: San Francisco
Re: MicroFirm [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2010, 12:36
Hey All,

Hmm. I hear people's points, but I still disagree. The problem, as I see it, with D, is that it does not involve two separate entities, which is the whole point. Instead, it discusses a general concept. But the main subject is extrapolating out from one company to make a conclusion about another company. In A, a conclusion is extrapolated out from one person to another. In D, there is simply an idea, which is then generalized. I truly don't think this works. If you want to blame the question, you can do that, but I would stand by A as a better choice than D.

-t
_________________


Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Kudos [?]: 1592 [0], given: 11

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Re: MicroFirm [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2010, 15:54
@ gmat1011 :

You are missing the point mate.
He says "if Gina refrains from gambling she will also avoid being penniless".

We means refraining is one of the causes(not the only cause so refraining is not compulsary here to avoind being penniless)

@ Tom :

Had everything been same between A and D, I would have agreed with the entity comparision concept provided .
But its not case. There is a clear logic of flaw that The question statement shares with D.

I would compare the logic between question and answer choice first, only then the in the next level of comparision i would consider the objects being compared.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 146

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: MicroFirm [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2010, 23:47
I'd go by Tommy's logic any day. It doesn't seem plausible that the OA is D.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2009
Posts: 391

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 5

GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
Re: MicroFirm [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2010, 06:48
A,
Agree with Tommy.

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 5

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1508

Kudos [?]: 1398 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: MicroFirm [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2010, 13:24
+1 for A.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1398 [0], given: 2

Re: MicroFirm   [#permalink] 22 Nov 2010, 13:24

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 26 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Very few software engineers have left MicroFirm Corporation

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.