GMAT Club Forumhttps://gmatclub.com:443/forum/ The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that tookhttps://gmatclub.com/forum/the-accompanying-chart-shows-the-of-petty-crimes-in-keono-that-took-399566.html Page 1 of 1

 Author: Sajjad1994 [ 01 Oct 2022, 07:00 ] Post subject: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took place at various distances from Central Square.From each drop down menu, select the option that provides the most accurate statement based on the information given.1. If there were 150% more crimes committed in 2007 than in 2004, the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2007 is approximately_____________% of the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2004.A. 54%B. 154%C. 200%D. 300%2. If there were 400 crimes committed in 2002, how many more crimes would need to be committed more than one mile from the city center for the number of these crimes to double the number of crimes committed less than 1/2 of a mile from the city center?A. 63B. 128C. 252D. 3601. D2. CGMAT Club's Integrated Reasoning Sprint 20225 Days | 15 Questions | Win Prizes | Get Better at GMATDay # 01 | Question # 02 | Date: Oct 01, 2022Click here for detail and master threadAttachment: 2.jpg [ 54.12 KiB | Viewed 1518 times ]

 Author: Ghostrider3147 [ 01 Oct 2022, 07:29 ] Post subject: Re: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took Ans1) c-200%Ans2) A-63Posted from my mobile device

 Author: Shankey94 [ 01 Oct 2022, 07:53 ] Post subject: Re: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took Q1:Let total crime in 2004 be xTotal crime in 2007 = x+1.5x = 2.5 (remember we have 150% more crime and not 150% times)Crimes more than 1 mile in 2004(C1) = 30% of xCrimes more than 1 mile in 2007(C2) = 36% of 2.5xC2/C1 = 36*2.5/30 = 3 = 300%Q2:total crimes = 400more than one mile crimes C1 = 27% of 400 = 108less than 0.5 mile crimes C2 = 45% of 400 = 180now we need C1 = 2C2hence 108 + x = 360x = 252

 Author: wadhwakaran [ 01 Oct 2022, 10:24 ] Post subject: Re: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took Q-1.Let's assume total crimes in 2004 to be 100Therefore as per question crimes in 2007 will be 100+150/100*100=250The number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2004= 30% of total crimes =30The number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2007= 36% of total crimes =36*250/100= 90Ratio of crimes in 2007/ratio of crimes in 2004=90/30=3Therefore the percentage will be 300% (option D)2. Total Crimes in 2002=400Less than .5=45%=1800.5 to 1=28%=112more than 1= 27%= 108Now as per question what should be added to 108 so that it becomes 360. the answer to this is 252 (optionC)

 Author: MiloMia [ 01 Oct 2022, 12:01 ] Post subject: Re: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took 1. If there were 150% more crimes committed in 2007 than in 2004, the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2007 is approximately_____________% of the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2004.For 2004, used 100 crimes, For 2007 used 250 (150%+).2007 = 250 * 36% = 902004 = 100 * 3090/30D. 300%2. If there were 400 crimes committed in 2002, how many more crimes would need to be committed more than one mile from the city center for the number of these crimes to double the number of crimes committed less than 1/2 of a mile from the city center?Original > 1 mile: 400*27% = 108< 1 mile: 400*45% = 180180 x 2 = 360108-360 = 252C. 252

 Author: SAHUSHIBASISH [ 01 Oct 2022, 14:15 ] Post subject: Re: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took Ans:1. 300%2. 252Solution:Assume total crime 2004 -100Crime count more than one milein 2004 - 30%= 30150 %more crime in 2007So Total crime in 2007- 250Crime count more than one milein 2007= 36%= 90Ratio = 90/30 =300%2.If total crime-100<0.5 crime- 45>1 crime- 27When total crime-100the number of these crimes to double the number of crimes committed less than 1/2 of a mile from the city center = 45×2 -27=63When total crime-400Ans - 63×4 = 252Posted from my mobile device

 Author: pintukr [ 01 Oct 2022, 20:44 ] Post subject: Re: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took 1. If there were 150% more crimes committed in 2007 than in 2004, the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2007 is approximately_____________% of the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2004.Suppose, Total crimes in 2004 = 100n Total crimes in 2007 = 250n (150% more crimes committed in 2007 than in 2004)> 1mile (in 2004) = 30% of 100n = 30n> 1mile (in 2007) = 36% of 250n = 90nhence, 90n/30n = 3 = 300%(D) is the CORRECT answer2. If there were 400 crimes committed in 2002, how many more crimes would need to be committed more than one mile from the city center for the number of these crimes to double the number of crimes committed less than 1/2 of a mile from the city center?< 0.5 mile (in 2002) = 45% of 400 = 180so, 2*180 = 360also, > 1 mile = 27% of 400 = 108More crimes (required) = 360-108 =252(C) is the CORRECT answer

 Author: Archit3110 [ 02 Oct 2022, 00:07 ] Post subject: Re: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took 1. If there were 150% more crimes committed in 2007 than in 2004, the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2007 is approximately_____________% of the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2004.A. 54%B. 154%C. 200%D. 300%let 2004 ; 1002007 ; 2005the number of crimes committed more than one mile 2004 ' 30the number of crimes committed more than one mile 2007 ; 90% (90-30) / 30 ; 200option C2. If there were 400 crimes committed in 2002, how many more crimes would need to be committed more than one mile from the city center for the number of these crimes to double the number of crimes committed less than 1/2 of a mile from the city center?A. 63B. 128C. 252D. 360< half mile 180>1 mile ; 108108 + x = 2*( 180)x = 360-108x=252Sajjad1994 wrote:The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took place at various distances from Central Square.From each drop down menu, select the option that provides the most accurate statement based on the information given.1. If there were 150% more crimes committed in 2007 than in 2004, the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2007 is approximately_____________% of the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2004.A. 54%B. 154%C. 200%D. 300%2. If there were 400 crimes committed in 2002, how many more crimes would need to be committed more than one mile from the city center for the number of these crimes to double the number of crimes committed less than 1/2 of a mile from the city center?A. 63B. 128C. 252D. 360GMAT Club's Integrated Reasoning Sprint 20225 Days | 15 Questions | Win Prizes | Get Better at GMATDay # 01 | Question # 02 | Date: Oct 01, 2022Click here for detail and master threadAttachment:2.jpg

 Author: Kushchokhani [ 02 Oct 2022, 01:01 ] Post subject: Re: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took 1. Answer is D- 300%Let the total number of crimes committed in 2004 be 100So, total number of crimes committed in 2007=250Using the graph, number of crimes committed more than one mile from Central Square in 2004=30And, number of crimes committed more than one mile from Central Square in 2007=9090 is 300% of 30. Hence, answer is D.2. Answer is C- 252Number of crimes committed in 2002=400Using the graph, number of crimes committed less than 1/2 of a mile from Central Square in 2002=180 (double of this is 360)And, number of crimes committed more than one mile from Central Square in 2002=108Required difference=360-108=252. Hence, answer is C.

 Author: av1901 [ 02 Oct 2022, 05:05 ] Post subject: Re: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took Sajjad1994 wrote:The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took place at various distances from Central Square.From each drop down menu, select the option that provides the most accurate statement based on the information given.1. If there were 150% more crimes committed in 2007 than in 2004, the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2007 is approximately_____________% of the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2004.A. 54%B. 154%C. 200%D. 300%2. If there were 400 crimes committed in 2002, how many more crimes would need to be committed more than one mile from the city center for the number of these crimes to double the number of crimes committed less than 1/2 of a mile from the city center?A. 63B. 128C. 252D. 360GMAT Club's Integrated Reasoning Sprint 20225 Days | 15 Questions | Win Prizes | Get Better at GMATDay # 01 | Question # 02 | Date: Oct 01, 2022Click here for detail and master threadAttachment:2.jpg1. If there were 150% more crimes committed in 2007 than in 2004, the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2007 is approximately_____________% of the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2004.A. 54%B. 154%C. 200%D. 300%SOLUTION: Let the total number of crimes in 2004 = $$x$$Therefore, total number of crimes in 2007 = $$\frac{150}{100} * x = 1.5x$$Number of crimes more than 1 mile from CS in 2007 = $$\frac{36}{100} * 1.5x$$Number of crimes more than 1 mile from CS in 2004 = $$\frac{27}{100} * x$$Crimes more than 1 mile away in 2007 / Crimes more than 1 mile away in 2004 = $$\frac{0.36*1.5x}{0.27*x} = 2 = 200%$$Answer: C2. If there were 400 crimes committed in 2002, how many more crimes would need to be committed more than one mile from the city center for the number of these crimes to double the number of crimes committed less than 1/2 of a mile from the city center?A. 63B. 128C. 252D. 360Total crimes in 2002 = 400No. of crimes less than 0.5 mile = $$\frac{45}{100} * 400 = 180$$No. of crimes between 0.5 to 1 mile = $$\frac{28}{100} * 400 = 112$$No. of crimes more than 1 mile = $$\frac{27}{100} * 400 = 108$$Now, as per questionWe need to determine a number, which when added to Number of crimes more than 1 mile, doubles the number of crimes less than 1/2 mile from city centerLet the number to be added be x$$108 + x = 2*180$$$$x = 360 - 108 = 252$$Answer - C

 Author: UtkarshAnand [ 02 Oct 2022, 05:34 ] Post subject: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took 1) Let the crimes committed in in 2004 be 100. So based on the information given, (150% more crimes committed in 2007 than in 2004), we get number of crimes committed in 2007 = 250 [100 + 150 (because 150% more)].No. of crimes committed more than 1 mile from Central Square in 2007 (from graph)= 36% of all crimes in 2007 = 36*250/100 = 90.No. of crimes committed more than 1 mile from Central Square in 2004 (from graph)= 30% of all crimes in 2004 = 30*100/100 = 30.Required % i.e. No. of crimes committed more than 1 mile from Central Square in 2007/No. of crimes committed more than 1 mile from Central Square in 2004 = 90/30 * 100 = 300. Answer D.2) Given that total no. of crimes in 2002 = 400.No. of crimes committed less than 1/2 mile from City Centre (from graph 45% of total crime) = 45/100 * 400 = 180.No. of crimes committed more than 1 mile from the City Centre (from graph 27% of total crime) = 27/100 * 400 = 108.The question asks us that how much should 108 increase to become equal to double the value of 180 (i.e. 360). So difference between 360 and 108 is our answer. 360 - 108 = 252. Answer C.

 Author: summerindecember [ 02 Oct 2022, 06:04 ] Post subject: Re: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took 1. If there were 150% more crimes committed in 2007 than in 2004, the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2007 is approximately_____________% of the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2004.A. 54%B. 154%C. 200%D. 300%Explanation: Total crimes 2004: 100 crimes (let's say it's 100)2007: 250 crimesCrimes >1mi2004: 30% * 100 = 332007: 36% * 250 = 90Crimes >1mi in 2007 compared to crime >1mi in 200490 / 33 = 272% or rounded up to 300%2. If there were 400 crimes committed in 2002, how many more crimes would need to be committed more than one mile from the city center for the number of these crimes to double the number of crimes committed less than 1/2 of a mile from the city center?A. 63B. 128C. 252D. 360Explanation: Crimes >1mi = 27% * 400 = 108Crimes <0.5mi = 45% * 400 = 180We are looking for the difference between ( 2 * crimes <0.5mi ) and ( crimes >1mi ).Therefore ( 2 * 180 ) - 108 = 360 - 108 = 252

 Author: Sajjad1994 [ 02 Oct 2022, 07:12 ] Post subject: Re: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took Hello Everyone!Answer to this question is:1. D2. CThe same is posted in the question.

 Author: Sajjad1994 [ 02 Oct 2022, 07:38 ] Post subject: Re: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took Official ExplanationFor the first question, you can pick numbers to represent the number of crimes in each 2004 and 2007. Since in 2007 there were 150% more than in 2004, you might use 100 for 2004 and 250 (the original 100 plus 150% of that) in 2007. Therefore, your calculation would be:2004: 30% of 100, so 302007: 36% of 250, which is 2.5(36) = 90Since 90 is 300% of 30, the answer is 300%.Answer: DFor the second question, if there were 400 crimes committed in 2002, then the 45% of them that took place within 0.5 mile would equal 180 crimes. The 27% of them that took place more than a mile away would equal 108. So in order for that 108 number to get to 360 (double the number within 0.5 mile), we'd need to add 252 more crimes in that zone, making the answer 252.Answer: C

 Author: Arm007 [ 02 Oct 2022, 08:09 ] Post subject: Re: The accompanying chart shows the % of petty crimes in Keono that took 1Q:Assume total no. of crime in 2004 as 100then total no of crime in 2007 = 100 + 150% of 100 = 100+100*(150/100)=250Now,C2004:the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2004 = 30% of 100 = 30C2007:the number of crimes committed more than one mile from 1 Central Square in 2007 = 36% of 250 = 90Ratio of C2007/C2004 = 90/30 = 3=> % of C2007/C2004 = 300%Hence D2Q:Given:Total crimes in 2002 = n= 400total crimes committed in less than 0.5 mile radius = n1 = 45% of 400 = 0.45*400 = 180total crimes committed in more than 1 mile radius = n2 = 27% of 400 = 0.27*400 = 108We want new n2(n2') to be 2n1so n2'=2*n1=2*180=360the number of crimes that needs to be committed more than one mile away = n2'-n2=360-108=252Hence C

 Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours Powered by phpBB © phpBB Grouphttp://www.phpbb.com/