It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 10:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Vorland s government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 06 May 2009
Posts: 76

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 3

Vorland s government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2009, 00:25
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Vorland’s government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking in restaurants. The objection that the ban would reduce restaurants’ revenues is ill founded. Several towns in Vorland enacted restaurant smoking restrictions five years ago. Since then, the amount the government collects in restaurant meal taxes in those towns has increased 34 percent, on average, but only 26 percent elsewhere in Vorland. The amount collected in restaurant meal taxes closely reflects restaurants’ revenues.

Which of the following, if true, most undermines the defense of the government’s plan?

A.When the state first imposed a restaurant meal tax, opponents predicted that restaurants’ revenues would decline as a result, a prediction that proved to be correct in the short term.
B.The tax on meals in restaurants is higher than the tax on many other goods and services.
C.Over the last five years, smoking has steadily declined throughout Vorland.
D.In many of the towns that restrict smoking in restaurants, restaurants can maintain separate dining areas where smoking is permitted.
E.Over the last five years, government revenues from sales taxes have grown no faster in the towns with restaurant smoking restrictions than in the towns that have no such restrictions.

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 3

Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 808

Kudos [?]: 374 [0], given: 106

WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2009, 00:33
IMO D
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Kudos [?]: 374 [0], given: 106

Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 155

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 11

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2009, 02:09
Concur with Sudeep, D.

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 11

Manager
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 195

Kudos [?]: 129 [0], given: 3

Schools: Stanford...Wait, I will come!!!

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2009, 03:11
ankur55 wrote:
Vorland’s government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking in restaurants. The objection that the ban would reduce restaurants’ revenues is ill founded. Several towns in Vorland enacted restaurant smoking restrictions five years ago. Since then, the amount the government collects in restaurant meal taxes in those towns has increased 34 percent, on average, but only 26 percent elsewhere in Vorland. The amount collected in restaurant meal taxes closely reflects restaurants’ revenues.

Which of the following, if true, most undermines the defense of the government’s plan?

A.When the state first imposed a restaurant meal tax, opponents predicted that restaurants’ revenues would decline as a result, a prediction that proved to be correct in the short term. Supports Govt Plan.
B.The tax on meals in restaurants is higher than the tax on many other goods and services.does not undermines
C.Over the last five years, smoking has steadily declined throughout Vorland. It does not undermines.
D.In many of the towns that restrict smoking in restaurants, restaurants can maintain separate dining areas where smoking is permitted.
E.Over the last five years, government revenues from sales taxes have grown no faster in the towns with restaurant smoking restrictions than in the towns that have no such restrictions.it poses a question mark on governments decision but not undermines itt

Kudos [?]: 129 [0], given: 3

Manager
Joined: 01 May 2009
Posts: 106

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 11

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2009, 03:46
D looks a better bet than others

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 11

Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2009
Posts: 151

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2009, 08:43
D

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 1

Re: Ban on Smoking   [#permalink] 21 Jul 2009, 08:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by