It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 13:19

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Waste management companies, which collect waste for disposal

Author Message
Director
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 595

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Waste management companies, which collect waste for disposal [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 10:20
Waste management companies, which collect waste for disposal in landfills and incineration plants, report that disposable plastics make up an ever-increasing percentage of the waste they handle. It is clear that attempts to decrease the amount of plastic that people throw away in the garbage are failing.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) Because plastics create harmful pollutants when burned, an increasing percentage of the plastics handled by waste management companies are being disposed of in landfills.
(B) Although many plastics are recyclable, most of the plastics disposed of by waste management companies are not.
(C) People are more likely to save and reuse plastic containers than containers made of heavier materials like glass or metal.
(D) An increasing proportion of the paper, glass, and metal cans that waste management companies used to handle is now being recycled.
(E) While the percentage of products using plastic packaging is increasing, the total amount of plastic being manufactured has remained unchanged.
_________________

Regards, S

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1431

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 10:28
"A", provides alternative expl of increase plastics in landfills.

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 850

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 11:03
I will go with 'C' - states that attempts to decrease the amount of plastic that people throw away is paying off.

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 595

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 14:18
I selected C as well but the OA is D?
S
_________________

Regards, S

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 14:27
He folks this is a classic percentage trap. Please learn it well.

Assume there two catagories of pollutants
(1) Plastic
(2) paper, glass, and metal cans

Assume 100 pounds of plastic is dumped every year and
100 pounds of paper, glass, and metal cans) is dumped.
So each catogory is dumping 50% now.

Let us say pollution control measures were adopted and now plastic amounts to 80 pounds and others amount to say 20 pounds

now plastic contributes 80% vs 50% and
others contribute 20% vs 50%

Infact plastic pollution has decreased from 100 pounds to 80 pounds though the percentage increased.

This is what (D) says. If this is true as shown above one cannot say plastic pollution has not reduced.

Remember when quantity A goes down significantly and if quantity B goes down not so significantly then the percentages can give completely wrong picture.

Last edited by anandnk on 17 Feb 2005, 14:27, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1431

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 14:27
hmmm....i c how "D" is the ans, this means that stuff other than plastic is being recycled in larger qnty....thus % of plastic for landfills is increasing.....good ques. "C" is wrong as we have to find an alternative expl for increase in plastic rather than talk abt people. Bet "A" and "D", "D" is better.

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 850

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 14:49

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 14:51

Hi Rathod,

Still in application process. Yet to hear from the schools I applied to. This wait is killing me.

Cheers,
Anand.

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 721

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: Milwaukee

Show Tags

17 Feb 2005, 19:50
This is a tough one. Thanks Anand
_________________

Praveen

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 595

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

22 Jun 2005, 13:12
anandnk wrote:
He folks this is a classic percentage trap. Please learn it well.

Assume there two catagories of pollutants
(1) Plastic
(2) paper, glass, and metal cans

Assume 100 pounds of plastic is dumped every year and
100 pounds of paper, glass, and metal cans) is dumped.
So each catogory is dumping 50% now.

Let us say pollution control measures were adopted and now plastic amounts to 80 pounds and others amount to say 20 pounds

now plastic contributes 80% vs 50% and
others contribute 20% vs 50%

Infact plastic pollution has decreased from 100 pounds to 80 pounds though the percentage increased.

This is what (D) says. If this is true as shown above one cannot say plastic pollution has not reduced.

Remember when quantity A goes down significantly and if quantity B goes down not so significantly then the percentages can give completely wrong picture.

On the same logic , I was thinking of B as the answer. let the two category be recyclable and non recyclable plastic. People are reducing the disposal/increasing the recycling of recycalble ones, so there is increase in the percentage of non recyclable one which is disposed by the waste management company.
_________________

Regards, S

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

22 Jun 2005, 18:25
I got D. Agree with Anand that it is a classic trap.

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 270

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Show Tags

23 Jun 2005, 00:24
anandnk wrote:
He folks this is a classic percentage trap. Please learn it well.

Assume there two catagories of pollutants
(1) Plastic
(2) paper, glass, and metal cans

Assume 100 pounds of plastic is dumped every year and
100 pounds of paper, glass, and metal cans) is dumped.
So each catogory is dumping 50% now.

Let us say pollution control measures were adopted and now plastic amounts to 80 pounds and others amount to say 20 pounds

now plastic contributes 80% vs 50% and
others contribute 20% vs 50%

Infact plastic pollution has decreased from 100 pounds to 80 pounds though the percentage increased.

This is what (D) says. If this is true as shown above one cannot say plastic pollution has not reduced.

Remember when quantity A goes down significantly and if quantity B goes down not so significantly then the percentages can give completely wrong picture.

cheers for that anandnk...was very helpful!

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

23 Jun 2005, 00:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by