It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 17:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 852

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2006, 19:48
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.

The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.
(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.
(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.
(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.
(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.

Please give reasons for ur choices...

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1013

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Works of art [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2006, 19:53
vineetgupta wrote:
We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.

The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.
(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.
(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.
(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.
(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.

Please give reasons for ur choices...

The highlighted text made me to go for B. "short term" and "contemporary" almost mean the same.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Works of art [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2006, 13:30
vineetgupta wrote:
We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.

The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.
(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.
(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.
(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.
(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.

Please give reasons for ur choices...

I want to say E. B captures the intent of only one part of the statement.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 743

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas, Texas

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2006, 17:49
The passage clearly suggests that a work of art can only be objectively great if it delights audiences for a long period of time. So the long time appeal determines the greatness not the short time subjective evaluation.
So the true merit of a work of art should be time tested and can't be objectively determined just after its release.

B is correct.

Example:
Dan brown's "Da Vinchi Code" is a very popular book but should we call it a classic ? Not yet. If it is still popular after 100 years, probably then we can.

"The Adventures of Hackleberry Finn" by Mark Twain is a classic because it is a time tested material.
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 702

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2006, 13:30
Yep B it is.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Nov 2006, 14:11
I see why B can be conclusion. However, if the question had been, 'Which one of the following best summarizes the idea of the passage' does anyone think E is appropriate. Perhaps this is why I get Conclusion questions wrong. I keep mixing it with Summary questions

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

13 Nov 2006, 14:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.